<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Door Opens For Hedge Fund ETFs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://etfdb.com/2009/door-opens-for-hedge-fund-etfs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://etfdb.com/2009/door-opens-for-hedge-fund-etfs/</link>
	<description>ETFdb: The Original &#38; Comprehensive ETF Database</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:15:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy H</title>
		<link>http://etfdb.com/2009/door-opens-for-hedge-fund-etfs/comment-page-1/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 18:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etfdb.com/?p=4981#comment-31</guid>
		<description>@robc I take it you work for Atticus?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@robc I take it you work for Atticus?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robc</title>
		<link>http://etfdb.com/2009/door-opens-for-hedge-fund-etfs/comment-page-1/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>robc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 17:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etfdb.com/?p=4981#comment-30</guid>
		<description>Get your facts straight.  Atticus was neither done in by investor redemptions nor under any scandal or cloud whatsoever.  The founder chose to wind down the business.  He voluntarily chose to return $4 billion which he had the contractual right to manage for up to 3 more years.  Redemption pressures were non-existent, and the business has always been run in a first-class way.

If your premise about ETFs being attractive alternatives is correct, you should not have to resort to fabricating &quot;data&quot; to support it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Get your facts straight.  Atticus was neither done in by investor redemptions nor under any scandal or cloud whatsoever.  The founder chose to wind down the business.  He voluntarily chose to return $4 billion which he had the contractual right to manage for up to 3 more years.  Redemption pressures were non-existent, and the business has always been run in a first-class way.</p>
<p>If your premise about ETFs being attractive alternatives is correct, you should not have to resort to fabricating &#8220;data&#8221; to support it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

