<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ETF Plays On The Microsoft-Yahoo! Deal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://etfdb.com/2009/etf-plays-on-the-microsoft-yahoo-deal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://etfdb.com/2009/etf-plays-on-the-microsoft-yahoo-deal/</link>
	<description>ETFdb: The Original &#38; Comprehensive ETF Database</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 13:01:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy H</title>
		<link>http://etfdb.com/2009/etf-plays-on-the-microsoft-yahoo-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 16:52:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etfdb.com/?p=3470#comment-25</guid>
		<description>This is a great development for Bing and MSFT. I have no idea why Yahoo! would have agreed to a deal under these terms?

MSFT, after years of failure in the search landscape, finally sustained some momentum with Bing, as you said... this deal is huge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great development for Bing and MSFT. I have no idea why Yahoo! would have agreed to a deal under these terms?</p>
<p>MSFT, after years of failure in the search landscape, finally sustained some momentum with Bing, as you said&#8230; this deal is huge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

