How An Apple (AAPL) Dividend Would Impact ETFs

by on February 28, 2012 | ETFs Mentioned:

Few stocks receive more attention from the financial presses than Apple (AAPL), the tech giant that has made a remarkable recovery from life support in the early 1990s to become one of the largest companies in the world. The stock has long been an investor favorite based on consumers’ insatiable appetite for almost every new product that the company throws their way. But from an investing standpoint, the first two months of the year have been nothing short of stellar, as the stock has shot up over 28%, or more than $100 per share. But perhaps the biggest buzz about the tech giant has not been about its performance, but the rumors of a special, one-time, distribution to its investors [see also 12 High-Yielding Commodities For 2012].

The Cash Stash

The speculation of this rare dividend comes from Apple’s alarmingly massive pile of cash, which sits just shy of $100 billion. Under the reign of Steve Jobs, Apple was always very careful with cash, a move that many speculate came from a brush with insolvency early on in the company’s history. That mentality has only been furthered by current CEO Tim Cook, who stated that “we are judicious, we are deliberate. We spend our money like it is our last penny. I think shareholders want us to do that. They don’t want us to act like we are rich. That may sound bizarre but that is the truth.” But with a cash stockpile that recently exceeded the holdings of the U.S. government, Cook has perhaps recognized that the company has more than it needs and is calculating its next move [see High Tech ETFdb Portfolio].

Though no dividend was announced at its shareholder meeting last week, the speculation still remains that the company will invariably be forced to make some kind of distribution. But this move would shake up not only the tech industry, but a number of exchange traded funds that hold AAPL as a significant portion of their assets. Recently, Apple became the world’s largest company by market capitalization, surpassing Exxon Mobil. But a major portion of the current market cap of about $488 billion comes from the mounting cash pile. A payout of  $50 per share, a figure that some analysts say would be reasonable, would still leave the company with around $30 billion in cash. But that move would effectively transfer tens of billions in market value from AAPL stock to cold, hard cash–potentially allowing Exxon’s $414 billion market cap to take back the number one spot [see also Crude Oil Guide: Brent Vs. WTI, What’s The Difference?].

The Exchange Traded Effect

If Apple does indeed make a significant distribution in coming months, it should be noted that the distribution could materially alter the composition of several exchange-traded funds. As AAPL’s market cap declines, so too does its allocation in cap-weighted indexes–regardless of whether that decline is driven by a change in investor sentiment towards the company or a special distribution of cash. Apple would be worth less if it were to suddenly shed tens of billions in market cap, so it makes sense that would be reflected in index weightings. In other words, a special dividend could result in ETF investors owning significantly less AAPL in their portfolios than they do now, effectively transferring that value to cash and the weightings within ETFs to other securities [see also AAPL Weighting In QQQ Slashed].

Another important issue to address is what happens to ETF investors if AAPL does in fact make a payout. While nothing can be said with certainty at this point, there are two options that fund issuers can take. They can either pass the dividend on to their investors (the most likely scenario) or they could hold onto the cash and make a reinvestment. Below, we profile a few ETFs with huge weightings in Apple–for the time being at least:

  •  PowerShares QQQ (QQQ): One of the most popular ETFs in the world, QQQ weights Apple as its top holding with about 15% of total holdings. The fund has over $33 billion in assets with a massive daily volume of over 50 million. QQQ pays a meager dividend of under 1%, but the proposed special dividend could boost that yield for a singular quarter.
  • Technology Select Sector SPDR (XLK): This fund tracks the U.S. technology sector and does so with nearly $9 billion in total assets. A 16% allocation makes Apple the largest holding of the ETF as it nearly doubles the weight of the next highest security. XLK’s annual dividend of 1.3% is sure to see a healthy jump if the special dividend goes through.
  • Dow Jones U.S. Technology Index Fund (IYW): IYW tracks an index with a similar methodology to XLK, but this fund is a bit smaller, with $1.5 billion in assets under management. Of the three funds on this list, IYW holds Apple in the highest regard, with a number one slot and a weighting of just over 18%. Similar to QQQ, IYW’s dividend is barely noticeable, but could make a mark with an Apple payout.

[For more ETF news sign up for our free ETFdb newsletter]

Disclosure: Photo courtesy of Joe Ravi. No positions at time of writing.

ETF Database is not an investment advisor, and any content published by ETF Database does not constitute individual investment advice. The opinions offered herein are not personalized recommendations to buy, sell or hold securities. From time to time, issuers of exchange-traded products mentioned herein may place paid advertisements with ETF Database. All content on ETF Database is produced independently of any advertising relationships. Read the full disclaimer here.

Are you enjoying ETF Database?

Get more articles like this one via our free daily e-mail newsletter or RSS feed.

Related News Stories

  • Anonymous

    “Apple would be worth less if it were to suddenly shed $70 billion in market cap,” Hmmm isn’t this true by definition? Or, should it be “if Apple was worth less, it would have a smaller market cap”. Oh…we are still using math, great!

    There is also the opinion that Apple does not get credit for their cash, and that adding more buying pressure with a dividend will increase the stock price, which last I checked, means an increase in market cap. So, any conclusion that spending the cash in a way that attracts buyers reduces market cap will have to send me back to my calculator to check that equation again.

    • saikatragadda

       Market cap might increase with the stock value going up but the company’s intrinsic value will go down as they have less cash after paying dividend.

  • Lucia

    Are people out of their minds? A U$ 50 dividend for a company that accumulated US$ 92 bi in cash? I don’t think any shareholder would approve of it

  • maxjean2

    You are silly ! 
     A payout of  $50 per share
    That is enough, and Apple can continier as if nothing had happened

    • maxjean2

      Sorry, that was broken
      You are silly ! 
       A payout of  $10 per share
      That is enough, and Apple can continier as if nothing had happened

    • Anonymous

      To be honest, $0 per share (dividend) and a huge year-on-year increase of stock price is enough.

  • Nabeel

    50 dollars a share seems really high to me. What does everyone else think? 

  • Lucia

    $50 a share doesn’t go with a company that spends every penny as if it was their last. I obviously agree with Nabeel and Maxjean2

  • Lucia

    $50 a share doesn’t go with a company that spends every penny as if it was their last. I obviously agree with Nabeel and Maxjean2

  • Justin Gennock

    This guy doesn’t know what he is talking about. 1st of all Apple has under a billion shares outstanding. If they did issue a dividend of $50 a share they would lose under $50 billion, of their cash horde. Second, if Apple comes out with a dividend they would do it so it pays out quarterly. Something in the ballpark of 5-15 billion. I hope that they buy back shares to decrease the shares outstanding driving the share price of the company up and leaving market value the same. This will also create higher earning per share and lower P/E ratios. 

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Dan-Henderson/589196990 Dan Henderson

    buy facebook, forget the dividend

  • Markkkk

    Another thing this writer doesn’t know: The cash stash DOESN’T count in “market cap.” (WHERE does he get this stuff…….)
    Maybe *we* should write these columns….. :haha:

  • Anonymous

    Wow – obviously a lot of thoughts here! I think some people may taking this a bit too seriously – the intent was to highlight the nuances of dividends on the allocation within a portfolio. Apple would be (substantially) the same company even if it paid out a big dividend, but would suddenly get a smaller allocation in many ETFs (and therefore, make up a much smaller portion of many portfolios). Just the nuances of index-based products – and hopefully a different way of looking at a relatively common event. 

  • Markkkk

    But WOULD it get a smaller allocation??
    That idea seems to be based on the premise that the cash stash counts in the market cap — which it doesn’t.

  • Anonymous

    Think of a portfolio with $5,000 in cash and $5,000 in AAPL stock. If that AAPL stocks makes a $1,000 dividend, your portfolio now has $6,000 in cash and $4,000 in AAPL stock. You could, of course, reinvest the proceeds of the dividend into more stock. But it’s still a transfer of value from stock to cash (which thereby impacts your portfolio, and could impact many ETFs). 

  • Markkkk

    Sorry! I realize that Jared is basically right about the market cap! What threw me off was that the cash isn’t DIRECTLY included in the market cap.
    I guess it’s like this: If there were a large dividend from the cash stash, the stock price (other things being equal) would DROP a corresponding amount — and that would lower the market cap.
    To that extent, the cash stash IS included.
    My apologies!!!

  • Goober

    There is so much bad here….
    First of all. If Apple paid a 50 dollar per share dividend, they’d still have a lot more than 30 billion in the bank. Apple has less than 950M outstanding shares, unless all of that money came from overseas and was subject to corporate tax. Do the math.

    Secondly… Apples market value wouldnt be affected at all. Apple is priced pretty consistently against its earnings. Paying a dividend would not affect their earnings, as quite simply all that money isnt really earning them anything. The stock might pop or drop for a day or a week, but it would return to its normal P/E. <15

    The Goob hath thusly ruled on this topic.

  • Tom Hendrickson

    Markkk – just to confirm, you’re being facetious right? If a company’s cash isn’t included in it’s market cap, where is it included?  

  • Tom Hendrickson

    Goober – not sure anyone’s following your math. For a moment, forget taxes and avoid muddying the water with overseas repatriation issues or share counts which are irrelevant. If a company pays a cash dividend either the market cap commensurately goes down given the decrease in the company’s assets OR if it stays the same or goes up that is reflective of the market paying a different multiple for the earnings. It’s important to make the distinction about balance sheet and income statement valuations methods in this case. I think the writer is making the assumption that currently the market is valuing AAPL cash on hand at a 1:1 ratio. 

Don't Forget to Join ETFdb - It's Free!

Please take a moment to register at ETF Database. There are several benefits to becoming an ETFdb member today:
  • Register on ETFdbGet access to special reports including How To Pick The Right ETF Every Time and Seven Simple & Cheap ETF Model Portfolios.
  • Get a free PDF download of 101 ETF Lessons Every Financial Advisor Should Learn.
  • Get unlimited access to all of our free and exclusive ETF tools, model portfolios, and research.

Join Now (it's free and only takes a moment) »

Previous post:

Next post: