Which S&P ETF Style Is Right For You

by on February 20, 2013 | ETFs Mentioned:

The expansion of the ETF universe continues to foster innovation as the growing product lineup offers investors numerous instruments for addressing their investment goals. In fact, with over 1,400+ ETPs to choose from, investors likely have multiple ways of accessing a particular asset class. As with any financial instrument, with innovation also comes complexity; as such, investors should remember to take a good hard look under the hood before jumping into a position because seemingly similar products often bear noteworthy differences.

With more than a handful of Growth and Value ETFs to choose from, some investors may be intimated by the sheer number of seemingly identical products. As always, remember that the devil is in the details [see 101 ETF Lessons Every Financial Advisor Should Learn].

Growth vs. ValueWall street

When it comes to equity exposure, investors have embraced the cost-efficient ETF structure as the preferred vehicle for rounding out their portfolios’ stock component. Breaking up the universe of equities into growth and value companies has long been a traditional approach for those looking to focus on a particular corner of the market. As such, the ETF universe has also grown to distinguish stocks based on fundamental criteria, allowing investors a simple way to employ an investment strategy that may have previously been too costly or complex to implement on their own  [also check Dividend.com's Money Management Tips Center].

The table below highlights the difference in performances across five ETFs offering exposure to the same corner of the  market:

  • SPDR S&P 500 (SPY, A)
  • S&P 500 Growth Index Fund (IVW, A)
  • S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund (RPG, B+)
  • S&P 500 Value Index Fund (IVE, B+)
  • S&P 500 Pure Value Fund (RPV, C+)

The Rydex “Pure” ETFs follow the same indexes as the iShares offerings, but while iShares has a portfolio of cheaper products with more holdings, the Rydex ETFs take a much stricter screening approach and create a more expensive, but also consistently stronger-performing, funds. Of course, there’s no universally right choice from the above ETFs; investors should take the time to investigate each fund individually before investing.

[For more ETF analysis, make sure to sign up for our free ETF newsletter or try a free seven-day trial to ETFdb Pro.]

Disclosure: No positions at time of writing.

ETF Database is not an investment advisor, and any content published by ETF Database does not constitute individual investment advice. The opinions offered herein are not personalized recommendations to buy, sell or hold securities. From time to time, issuers of exchange-traded products mentioned herein may place paid advertisements with ETF Database. All content on ETF Database is produced independently of any advertising relationships. Read the full disclaimer here.

Are you enjoying ETF Database?

Get more articles like this one via our free daily e-mail newsletter or RSS feed.

Related News Stories

Don't Forget to Join ETFdb - It's Free!

Please take a moment to register at ETF Database. There are several benefits to becoming an ETFdb member today:
  • Register on ETFdbGet access to special reports including How To Pick The Right ETF Every Time and Seven Simple & Cheap ETF Model Portfolios.
  • Get a free PDF download of 101 ETF Lessons Every Financial Advisor Should Learn.
  • Get unlimited access to all of our free and exclusive ETF tools, model portfolios, and research.

Join Now (it's free and only takes a moment) »

Previous post:

Next post: