Welcome to ETFdb.com. Please help us personalize your experience.
Thank you for your submission, we hope you enjoy your experience

Select the one that best describes you

Just Released: August 2016 ETF Edge — Learn More

Etfdb logo

While the bread-and-butter of the ETF industry has been index-tracking products, active ETFs are quickly growing in popularity as several funds have gained critical mass with investors. More importantly, these funds have allowed retail investors to apply professional management to a variety of asset classes and strategies.

What’s the Appeal?

For investors, there’s a lot to like about active ETFs. First, given the markets heavy volatility over the last few years, active ETFs –because they are managed by a professional–have the ability to shift allocations and positions according to the economic environment. Recent studies have shown that managers with high “active shares”–or the percentage of a fund’s weight-adjusted portfolio that differs from its benchmark–can produce extra returns for portfolios. Typically, active ETFs have an alpha-seeking objective and are designed to “beat the market.” Those extra returns can mean a great deal when the market is moving sideways.

Wall Street physical sign

Secondly, active ETFs make a great substitute for mutual funds. Active ETF fees are often less expensive than mutual funds in the same Morningstar (MORN) category. This “cheapness” extends to esoteric asset classes normally reserved for high net worth individuals, which are only accessed through separate managed accounts.

Try our Mutual Fund To ETF Converter.

Finally, like index ETFs, investors can gain access to superstar managers with lower initial investments. For example, PIMCO’s flagship Total Return Fund requires an initial investment of $1,000 or more depending on the share class. The PIMCO’s Total Return ETF (BOND B) can be purchased for around $110. This lower initial investment makes it more widely available to smaller investors.

How Much Will It Cost?

Though active ETFs are typically more expensive than passive index ETFs- some broad market trackers are basically free at this point–they are still considerably cheaper than actively managed mutual funds. According to the latest Investment Company Institute (ICI) report, the average mutual fund investor–including index funds–paid 1.07% in expenses last year. That doesn’t even include the average 5.73% sales load [see our Actively-Managed ETF Portfolio].

For active ETF investors, these costs are much lower. For example, the Guggenheim Enhanced Short Duration Bond ETF (GSY A) can be had for only 0.30% in expenses. Below are the cheapest active ETFs in their respective asset class categories.

Asset Class Active ETFExpense Ratio
AlternativesWisdomTree Global Real Return (RRF C+)0.65%
BondRiverFront Strategic Income Fund (RIGS B+)0.22%
CurrencyDreyfus Chinese Yuan Fund (CYB A+)0.45%
EquityEnhanced U.S. Large-Cap (IELG A-)0.18%
Multi-AssetSPDR SSgA Global Allocation ETF (GAL A) 0.35%
Real EstatePowerShares Active U.S. Real Estate (PSR C+)0.80%

Are They Worth It?

Actively managed ETFs have higher fees than your normal index fund expense ratios, so investors expect actively managed ETFs to outperform or beat the market. As with any fund, that potential outperformance comes down to just how good the underlying managers are. Just as in the mutual fund world, there are plenty of stinker funds. However, there are managers and active ETFs that have beaten their respective benchmark indexes consistently – some by a wide margin.

For example, the Peritus High Yield ETF (HYLD A-)–which bets on junk-bonds–beat its rival iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond (HYG A) by almost 3% in 2012. Not to mention, it also pays a much higher dividend.

See also 101 High Yielding ETFs For Every Dividend Investor.

Another example is the previously mentioned PIMCO Total Return ETF. According to Morningstar, since its launch, BOND has posted a total return of roughly 12% versus just 3% for the iShares Core Total US Bond Market ETF (AGG A+) over the same time frame. Additionally, it has also outperformed the PIMCO Total Return Mutual Fund by nearly 2% over the trailing one-year period (as of April 1, 2015).

The Bottom Line

For investors, there is a lot to like about active ETFs; these ETFs’ lower expense ratios, lower initial investments and professional management make them perfect substitutes for mutual funds. The active management can result in higher and benchmark-beating returns, but investors need to take a close look under the hood of all of their ETF options to find the perfect balance of risk, reward, and costs before investing.

For more ETF analysis, make sure to sign up for our free ETF newsletter or try a free 14-day trial to ETFdb Pro.

Disclosure: No positions at time of writing.

Popular Articles

PRO Shutterstock 124026754

High-Yield Prospects: August 28 Edition

Here is a look at ETFs that currently offer attractive income opportunities. The high-yield...

PRO Shutterstock 162625571

Best & Worst Weekly Performers: August 27 Edition

Here is a look at the 25 best and 25 worst ETFs from the past trading week. Traders can use this...


ETF Scorecard: August 26 Edition

To help investors keep up with the markets, we present our ETF Scorecard. The Scorecard takes a...

Knowledge Centers