SPTL
SPDR Portfolio Long Term Treasury ETF

Price: $27.14
Change: $0.3 (-0.01%)
Category: Government Bonds
Last Updated:

Vitals

Issuer State Street
Brand SPDR
Structure ETF
Expense Ratio 0.03%
ETF Home Page Home page
Inception May 23, 2007

Analyst Report

The SPDR Portfolio Long Term Treasury ETF (SPTL) tracks an index that offers exposure to U.S. Treasuries with a remaining maturity of 10 years or more. SPTL delivers minimal credit risk, but a significant amount of interest-rate risk. SPTL might be useful for investors who crave safety and are willing to take on longer duration, a measure of bond price sensitivity to interest rate changes. Typically bond prices fall when rates rise.


Like most SPDR “Portfolio” ETFs, SPTL is priced competitively with ultra-low-cost rivals like the Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF (VGLT) and the Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHQ). SPTL also has good daily liquidity, making the fund a solid contender for investors looking for exposure to long-term U.S. Treasuries.


State Street launched its ultra-low-cost SPDR Portfolio lineup in October 2017 after years of losing market share to cheaper rivals at BlackRock, Schwab, and Vanguard. This was a humiliating setback since State Street essentially founded the modern ETF market in 1993 with the launch of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY). State Street was late to the ultra-low-cost space — BlackRock launched its low-cost iShares Core series five years earlier — but has pushed hard to make up ground. Many of its SPDR Portfolio funds were renamed and repriced for this purpose. Prior to October 2017, SPTL traded under the name SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Long Term Treasury ETF with the ticker TLO.

ETF Database Themes

Category Government Bonds
Asset Class Bond
Region (General) North America
Region (Specific) U.S.
Bond Type(s) Treasuries
Bond Duration Long-Term

FactSet Classifications

Segment Fixed Income: U.S. - Government, Treasury Investment Grade Long-Term
Category Government, Treasury
Focus Investment Grade
Niche Long-Term
Strategy Vanilla
Weighting Scheme Market Value

Trading Data

Open - Volume -
Day Lo - Day Hi -
  • Open
  • Volume
  • Day Lo
  • Day Hi
  • 52 Week Lo $25.28
  • 52 Week Hi $29.67
  • AUM $10,855.6 M
  • Shares 395.9 M

Historical Trading Data

  • 1 Month Avg. Volume 4,173,991
  • 3 Month Avg. Volume 4,688,612

Alternative ETFs in the ETF Database Government Bonds Category

Type Symbol Expense Ratio Assets Avg. Daily Vol YTD Return
Cheapest SCHO 0.03% $11.2 B 2 M 3.69%
Largest (AUM) TLT 0.15% $54.7 B 40 M -4.48%
Most Liquid (Volume) TLT 0.15% $54.7 B 40 M -4.48%
Top YTD Performer RISR 1.23% $67.0 M 22,562 21.65%

Alternative ETFs in the FactSet Fixed Income: U.S. - Government, Treasury Investment Grade Long-Term Segment

Type Symbol Expense Ratio Assets Avg. Daily Vol YTD Return
Cheapest SCHQ 0.03% $780.2 M 391,788 -3.14%
Largest (AUM) TLT 0.15% $54.7 B 40 M -4.48%
Most Liquid (Volume) TLT 0.15% $54.7 B 40 M -4.48%
Top YTD Performer TLTW 0.35% $1.1 B 753,383 1.00%

Top 15 Holdings

Concentration Analysis

This section compares how balanced and deep this ETF is relative to its peers.

Holdings Comparison

SPTL ETF Database Category Average FactSet Segment Average
Number of Holdings 89 60 26
% of Assets in Top 10 23.13% 54.47% 76.87%
% of Assets in Top 15 32.03% 64.72% 81.97%
% of Assets in Top 50 79.09% 90.18% 94.39%

Size Comparison

SPTL ETF Database Category Average FactSet Segment Average
Large (>12.9B) N/A N/A N/A
Mid (>2.7B) N/A N/A N/A
Small (>600M) N/A N/A N/A
Micro (<600M) N/A N/A N/A

SPTL Valuation

This section compares the P/E ratio of this ETF to its peers.

SPTL
P/E Ratio
N/A
ETF Database Category Average
P/E Ratio
N/A
FactSet Segment Average
P/E Ratio
N/A

SPTL Dividend

This section compares the dividend yield of this ETF to its peers.

SPTL ETF Database Category Average FactSet Segment Average
Dividend $ 0.09 $ 0.19 $ 0.12
Dividend Date 2024-12-02 N/A N/A
Annual Dividend Rate $ 1.05 $ 2.25 $ 0.95
Annual Dividend Yield 3.82% 4.45% 1.93%

SPTL Price and Volume Charts

View charts featuring SPTL price and volume data.

SPTL Fund Flows Charts

View charts featuring ETF fund flow data.

5 Day Net Flows: 71.71 M 1 Month Net Flows: 116.31 M 3 Month Net Flows: -91.73 M 6 Month Net Flows: 1.4 B 1 Year Net Flows: 3.13 B 3 Year Net Flows: 8.51 B 5 Year Net Flows: 11.34 B 10 Year Net Flows: 12.85 B

SPTL Price vs Flows AUM Influence Charts

View charts that break down the influence that fund flows and price had on overall assets.

5 Day Net AUM Change: -119.72 M
1 Month Net AUM Change: 218.67 M
3 Month Net AUM Change: -873.05 M
6 Month Net AUM Change: 1.5 B
1 Year Net AUM Change: 2.93 B
3 Year Net AUM Change: 6.1 B
5 Year Net AUM Change: 9 B
10 Year Net AUM Change: 10.71 B

Realtime Rating

The adjacent table gives investors an individual Realtime Rating for SPTL on several different metrics, including liquidity, expenses, performance, volatility, dividend, concentration of holdings in addition to an overall rating. The "A+ Metric Rated ETF" field, available to ETF Database Pro members, shows the ETF in the Government Bonds with the highest Metric Realtime Rating for each individual field. To view all of this data, sign up for a free 14-day trial for ETF Database Pro. To view information on how the ETF Database Realtime Ratings work, click here.

Metric Metric Realtime Rating A+ Metric Rated ETF
Liquidity A TLT
Expenses A+ SPTL
Performance
Volatility
Dividend
Concentration

A+ Overall Rated ETF:

SPTL Expenses & Fees

This section compares the cost efficiency of this ETF to its peers.

Expenses Ratio Analysis

SPTL
Expense Ratio
0.03%
ETF Database Category Average
Expense Ratio
0.15%
FactSet Segment Average
Expense Ratio
0.33%

Tax Analysis

Max ST Capital Gains Rate 39.60%
Max LT Capital Gains Rate 20.00%
Tax On Distributions Ordinary income
Distributes K1 No
ESG Themes and Scores
5.86/10
ESG Score
33.52%
Global Percentile
25.39%
Peer Percentile
    • Revenue Exposure to Environmental Impact (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Severe Environment Controversies (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Sustainable Impact Solutions (%)
      0.0%
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Weighted Average Carbon Intensity (Tons of CO2e / $M Sales)
      1.81
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Fossil Fuel Reserves (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • High Impact Fossil Fuel Reserves (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Water Stress High Risk Business Segment (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Water Stress High Risk Geography (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Water Stress Exposure Moderate (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Water Stress Exposure High (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Water Stress Exposure Low (%)
      Higher improves ESG score
    • Revenue Exposure to Energy Efficiency (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Revenue Exposure to Alternative Energy (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Revenue Exposure to Green Building (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Revenue Exposure to Pollution Prevention (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Revenue Exposure to Water Sustainability (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Revenue Exposure to Social Impact (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Sustainable Impact Solutions (%)
      0.0%
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • SRI Exclusion Criteria (%)
      0.0%
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Revenue Exposure to Affordable Real Estate (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Revenue Exposure to Education (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Revenue Exposure to Major Disease Treatment (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Revenue Exposure to Nutrition (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Revenue Exposure to Sanitation (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Revenue Exposure to SME Finance (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Human Rights Norms Violation (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Human Rights Norms Violation OR Watch List (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Severe Human Rights Controversies (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Labor Norms Violation (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Labor Norms Violation OR Watch List (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Severe Labor Controversies (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Severe Customer Controversies (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Global Compact Compliance Violation (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Global Compact Compliance Violation OR Watch List (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Catholic Values Fail (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Islamic Non-Compliant (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Adult Entertainment Involvement (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Alcohol Involvement (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Gambling Involvement (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Nuclear Power Involvement (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Tobacco Involvement (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Weapons Involvement (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Controversies Weapons Involvement (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Civilian Firearms Involvement (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Civilian Firearms Retailer (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Civilian Firearms Producer (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Direct Predatory Lending Involvement (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Genetic Engineering Involvement (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Severe Governance Controversies (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Board Flag (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Lack of Independent Board Majority (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Board Independence (0-25%) (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Board Independence (25-50%) (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Board Independence (50-75%) (%)
      Higher improves ESG score
    • Board Independence (75-100%) (%)
      Higher improves ESG score
    • No Female Directors (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Three OR More Female Directors (%)
      Higher improves ESG score
    • Females Represent 30% of Directors (%)
      Higher improves ESG score
    • Entrenched Board (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Overboarding (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Negative Director Votes (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Ownership AND Control Flag (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • One Share One Vote (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • No Annual Director Elections (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Does Not Use Majority Voting (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Significant Votes Against Pay Practices (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Controlling Shareholder (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Controlling Shareholder Concerns (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Cross Shareholdings (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Poison Pill (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Pay Flag (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • No Pay Performance Link (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Lack of Internal Pay Equity (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Executive Pay Non-Disclosure (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Accounting Flag (%)
      Lower improves ESG score

SPTL Performance

This section shows how this ETF has performed relative to its peers. Returns over 1 year are annualized.

SPTL ETF Database
Category Average
Factset Segment
Average
1 Month Return -0.47% 0.21% -0.33%
3 Month Return -7.64% -2.38% -4.23%
YTD Return -3.17% 1.79% -1.83%
1 Year Return -0.71% 2.75% -0.83%
3 Year Return -11.07% -1.69% -3.21%
5 Year Return -5.12% -0.47% -1.15%

Geographic Exposure

The following charts reflect the geographic spread of SPTL's underlying holdings.

Holdings Analysis

The following charts reflect the allocation of SPTL's underlying holdings.

Asset Percentage
Sovereign 99.99%
Open-ended Fund 0.02%
Bond Sector Percentage
Maturity Percentage
Less Than 1 Year 0.0%
1-3 Years 0.0%
3-5 Years 0.0%
5-7 Years 0.0%
7-10 Years 0.0%
10-15 Years 0.0%
15-20 Years 0.0%
20-30 Years 0.0%
30+ Years 0.0%
Asset Percentage
Sovereign 99.99%
Open-ended Fund 0.02%

SPTL Technicals

Volatility Analysis

This section shows how the volatility of this ETF compares to the peer group ETF Database Category.

5 Day Volatility 78.16%
20 Day Volatility 11.75%
50 Day Volatility 13.29%
200 Day Volatility 12.96%
Beta 0.05
Standard Deviation 0.90%
5 Day Volatility
78.16%
Rank
5 of 61

20 Day Volatility
11.75%
Rank
11 of 62

50 Day Volatility
13.29%
Rank
10 of 62

200 Day Volatility
12.96%
Rank
11 of 62

Beta
0.05
Rank
17 of 56

Standard Deviation
0.90%
Rank
29 of 62

Technicals

  • 20 Day MA $27.38
  • 60 Day MA $27.68
  • MACD 15 Period -0.41
  • MACD 100 Period -0.86
  • Williams % Range 10 Day 98.52
  • Williams % Range 20 Day 64.67
  • RSI 10 Day 39
  • RSI 20 Day 44
  • RSI 30 Day 46
  • Ultimate Oscillator 46

Bollinger Bands

  • Lower Bollinger (10 Day) $27.29
  • Upper Bollinger (10 Day) $28.16
  • Lower Bollinger (20 Day) $26.52
  • Upper Bollinger (20 Day) $28.23
  • Lower Bollinger (30 Day) $26.52
  • Upper Bollinger (30 Day) $28.07

Support & Resistance

  • Support Level 1 $27.07
  • Support Level 2 $26.99
  • Resistance Level 1 $27.27
  • Resistance Level 2 $27.40

Stochastic

  • Stochastic Oscillator %D (1 Day) 23.45
  • Stochastic Oscillator %D (5 Day) 26.01
  • Stochastic Oscillator %K (1 Day) 37.85
  • Stochastic Oscillator %K (5 Day) 48.67

Tradability

  • Tracking Difference Median (%) 0.00
  • Tracking Difference Max Upside (%) 0.43
  • Tracking Difference Max Downside (%) -0.25
  • Median Premium Discount (%) 0.06
  • Maximum Premium Discount (%) 0.30
  • Average Spread (%) 1.00
  • Average Spread ($) 1.00

Financial Advisor Report

ETF Database's Financial Advisor Reports are designed as an easy handout for clients to explain the key information on a fund. Includes new analyst insights and classification data.

Fact Sheet

Fact sheets are issued by the ETF provider and framed by ETF Database. Information contained within the fact sheet is not guaranteed to be timely or accurate.

Data Lineage

ETF Trends and ETF Database , the preeminent digital platforms for ETF news, research, tools, video, webcasts, native content channels, and more. The ETF Trends and ETF Database brands have been trusted amongst advisors, institutional investors, and individual investors for a combined 25 years. The firms are uniquely positioned to aid advisor’s education, adoption, and usage of ETFs, as well as the asset management community’s transition from traditionally analog to digital interactions with the advisor community.

Our team at ETF Database is committed to making our website the premier source of information on ETF investing with the world’s highest quality ETF tools, content, and resources.

Have Questions? Contact Us.

Powered By:

FactSet
Barchart

Analyst Report Authors

ETF Database analysts have a combined 50 years in the ETF and Financial markets, covering every asset class and investment style. The team monitors new filings, new launches and new issuers to make sure we place each new ETF in the appropriate context so Financial Advisors can construct high quality portfolios.

Disclosures

Copyright © 2024 FactSet Research Systems Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright MSCI ESG Research LLC [2018]. All Rights Reserved. MSCI ESG Research LLC’s (“MSCI ESG”) Fund Metrics products (the “Information”) provide environmental, social and governance data with respect to underlying securities within more than 23,000 multi-asset class Mutual Funds and ETFs globally. MSCI ESG is a Registered Investment Adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. MSCI ESG materials have not been submitted, to nor received approval from, the US SEC or any other regulatory body. None of the information constitutes an offer to buy or sell, or a promotion or recommendation of, any security, financial instrument or product or trading strategy, nor should it be taken as an indication or guarantee of any future performance, analysis, forecast or prediction. None of the Information can be used to determine which securities to buy or sell or when to buy or sell them. The Information is provided “as is” and the user of the Information assumes the entire risk of any use it may make or permit to be made of the Information. All Information is provided solely for your internal use, and may not be reproduced or redisseminated in any form without express prior written permission from MSCI. Neither MSCI ESG nor any of its affiliates or any third party involved in or related to creating any Information makes any express or implied warranties, representations or guarantees, and in no event will MSCI ESG or any such affiliate or third party have any liability for any direct, indirect, special, punitive, consequential or any other damages (including lost profits) relating to any Information. More information on MSCI ESG Fund Metrics, provided by MSCI ESG Research LLC, can be found at https://www.msci.com/esg-fund-metrics.
© 2024 Market data provided is at least 15-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions.

Information is provided 'as is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use, please see disclaimer.

Content continues below advertisement