ETFdb Logo
  • ETF Database
  • Channels
    • Themes
      • Active ETF
      • Alternatives Channel
      • Artificial Intelligence
      • China Insights
      • Climate Insights
      • Core Strategies
      • Crypto
      • Disruptive Technology
      • Energy Infrastructure
      • ETF Building Blocks
      • ETF Education
      • ETF Investing
      • ETF Strategist
      • Faith-Based Investing
      • Financial Literacy
      • Fixed Income
      • Free Cash Flow
      • Innovative ETFs
      • Invest Beyond Cash
      • Leveraged & Inverse
      • Modern Alpha
      • Portfolio Strategies
      • Tax Efficient Income
    • Asset Class
      • Equity
        • U.S. Equity
        • Int'l Developed
        • Emerging Market Equities
      • Alternatives
        • Gold/Silver/Critical Materials
        • Crypytocurrency
        • Currency
        • Volatility
      • Fixed Income
        • Investment Grade Corporates
        • US Treasuries & TIPS
        • High Yield Corporates
        • Int'l Fixed Income
    • ETF Ecosystem
    • ETFs in Canada
    • Market Outlook
    • Crypto ETF Hub
  • Tools
    • ETF Screener
    • ETF Country Exposure Tool
    • ETF Database Categories
    • Indexes
    • Scenario Analysis
    • Watchlists
    • Head-To-Head ETF Comparison Tool
    • Mutual Fund To ETF Converter
    • ETF Stock Exposure Tool
    • ETF Issuer Fund Flows
  • Research
    • ETF Education
    • Equity Investing
    • Dividend ETFs
    • Leveraged ETFs
    • Inverse ETFs
    • Index Education
    • Index Insights
    • Top ETF Sectors
    • Top ETF Issuers
    • Top ETF Industries
  • Webcasts
  • Themes
    • AI ETFs
    • Blockchain ETFs
    • See all Thematic Investing ETF themes
    • ESG Investing
    • Marijuana ETFs
  • Multimedia
    • ETF 360 Video Series
    • ETF of the Week Podcast
    • Gaining Perspective Podcast
    • ETF Prime Podcast
    • Video
  • Company
    • About VettaFi
    • Get VettaFi’ed
  • PRO
    • Pro Content
    • Pro Tools
    • Advanced
    • FAQ
    • Pricing
    • Free Sign Up
    • Login
  1. Innovative ETFs Channel
  2. Fill Gaps in SMID-Cap Exposure With XMHQ and XSHQ
Innovative ETFs Channel
Share

Fill Gaps in SMID-Cap Exposure With XMHQ and XSHQ

Elle Caruso FitzgeraldJul 22, 2024
2024-07-22

Investors may want to consider filling any gaps in smid-cap exposure.

Many investors may be missing out on the growth potential mid- and small-cap companies. The Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ B) and the Invesco S&P SmallCap Quality ETF (XSHQ B-) may be a solution for investors to get exposure while potentially taking on less risk.

As investors have increasingly turned to quality ETFs in recent years due to market uncertainty, XSHQ and XMHQ have seen sizable inflows. SMID-cap ETFs XMHQ has seen $2.1 billion in net flows year to date through July 19, while XSHQ has accreted $183 million during the same period.

Comparing Quality ETFs Down the Cap Spectrum

XMHQ and XSHQ are in the same suite of quality ETFs as the popular $10.2 billion Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ A-).

SPHQ comprises 100 companies from the S&P 500 that have attractive quality scores. These scores are calculated based on three fundamental measures: return on equity, accruals ratio, and financial leverage ratio. SPHQ includes many mega caps and household names, such as Microsoft (MSFT) and Apple Inc. (AAPL).


Content continues below advertisement

On the other hand, XMHQ offers quality mid-cap exposure. The fund does this by tracking an index that includes the 80 securities in the S&P Midcap 400 Index that have the highest quality scores. These scores are calculated using the same proprietary factors as SPHQ. Top names in XMHQ include Williams-Sonoma (WSM) and Carlisle Companies Incorporated (CSL).

Furthermore, XMHQ has grown significant in recent years and now has $5 billion in assets under management.

XSHQ, the youngest and smallest of the three funds, launched in 2017 and has $293 million in assets. The small-cap quality ETF is made up of 120 securities in the S&P SmallCap 600 Index that have the highest quality score, calculated in the same way as SPHQ and XMHQ.

The top two names in XSHQ currently include Abercrombie & Fitch ANF and Mueller Industries MLI.

SPHQ charged 15 basis points, XMHQ charges 25 basis points, and XSHQ charges 30 basis points.

For more news, information, and analysis, visit the Innovative ETFs Channel.

Loading Articles...
Our Sites
  • VettaFi
  • Advisor Perspectives
  • ETF Trends
Tools
  • ETF Screener
  • Mutual Fund to ETF Converter
  • Head-To-Head ETF Comparison
  • ETF Country Exposure Tool
  • ETF Stock Exposure Tool
  • ETF Database Pro
More Tools
  • Financial Advisor & RIA Center
Explore ETFs
  • ETF News
  • ETF Category Reports
  • Premium Articles
  • Alphabetical Listing of ETFs
  • Browse ETFs by ETF Database Category
  • Browse ETFs by Index
  • Browse ETFs by Issuer
  • Compare ETFs
Information
  • Contact Us
  • Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
  • © 2025 VettaFi LLC. All rights reserved.

Advertisement

Is Your Portfolio Positioned With Enough Global Exposure?

ETF Education Channel

How to Allocate Commodities in Portfolios

Tom LydonApr 26, 2022
2022-04-26

A long-running debate in asset allocation circles is how much of a portfolio an investor should...

Core Strategies Channel

Why ETFs Experience Limit Up/Down Protections

Karrie GordonMay 13, 2022
2022-05-13

In a digital age where information moves in milliseconds and millions of participants can transact...

}
X