QAT vs. SPY: Head-To-Head ETF Comparison
The table below compares many ETF metrics between QAT and SPY.
Compare fees, performance, dividend yield, holdings, technical indicators, and many other metrics to make a better investment decision.
Overview
Some important comparison metrics here are expense ratio, issuer, AUM, and shares outstanding,
among others. Furthermore, ADV in the 11th and 12th row, which stands for Average Daily Volume,
can help investors avoid illiquid ETFs.
Holdings
Compare the number of holdings, all ETF holdings, asset allocation, and much more.
Each asset class has unique holdings data. For instance, only equity ETFs will display
sector and market cap breakdown, among other equity fields. Bond ETFs on the other hand,
will display the type of bond, coupon breakdown, credit quality, and more bond specific metrics.
| Asset |
Percentage |
| Share/Common/Ordinary |
99.92% |
| CASH |
0.08% |
| Asset |
Percentage |
| Share/Common/Ordinary |
99.8% |
| CASH |
0.3% |
| Sector |
Percentage |
| Finance |
61.19% |
| Non-Energy Minerals |
9.89% |
| Transportation |
8.74% |
| Communications |
5.01% |
| Energy Minerals |
4.83% |
| Process Industries |
3.99% |
| Utilities |
2.81% |
| Retail Trade |
1.3% |
| Distribution Services |
0.88% |
| Technology Services |
0.69% |
| Health Services |
0.59% |
| CASH |
0.08% |
| Sector |
Percentage |
| Electronic Technology |
21.88% |
| Technology Services |
19.39% |
| Finance |
12.47% |
| Health Technology |
8.91% |
| Retail Trade |
7.72% |
| Consumer Non-Durables |
4.12% |
| Producer Manufacturing |
3.8% |
| Consumer Services |
3.0% |
| Energy Minerals |
2.9% |
| Commercial Services |
2.7% |
| Utilities |
2.58% |
| Health Services |
2.11% |
| Consumer Durables |
1.99% |
| Process Industries |
1.73% |
| Transportation |
1.51% |
| Industrial Services |
0.93% |
| Communications |
0.91% |
| Distribution Services |
0.61% |
| Non-Energy Minerals |
0.54% |
| CASH |
0.3% |
| Market Cap |
Percentage |
| Large |
43.95% |
| Mid |
40.02% |
| Small |
12.38% |
| Micro |
3.57% |
| Market Cap |
Percentage |
| Large |
98.66% |
| Mid |
1.04% |
| Small |
0.0% |
| Micro |
0.0% |
| Region |
Percentage |
| Europe |
99.92% |
| Other |
0.08% |
| Region |
Percentage |
| North, Central and South America |
99.8% |
| Other |
0.3% |
| Country |
Percentage |
| Qatar |
99.92% |
| Other |
0.08% |
| Country |
Percentage |
| United States |
96.95% |
| Ireland |
1.66% |
| United Kingdom |
0.63% |
| Other |
0.3% |
| Switzerland |
0.27% |
| Netherlands |
0.12% |
| Bermuda |
0.11% |
| Canada |
0.06% |
ESG Scores
ESG Scores represent how an ETF's constituents, in aggregate, manage ESG risks and opportunities. Compare ESG metrics across multiple themes including environmental, social, governance and morality.
|
|
|
|
ESG Score
|
3.88 |
6.7 |
|
ESG Score Peer Percentile (%)
|
0.000% |
47.330% |
|
ESG Score Global Percentile (%)
|
4.120% |
56.100% |
|
Revenue Exposure to Environmental Impact (%)
|
|
|
|
Severe Environment Controversies (%)
|
|
|
|
Sustainable Impact Solutions (%)
|
0.400% |
7.310% |
|
Revenue Exposure to Social Impact (%)
|
|
|
|
SRI Exclusion Criteria (%)
|
0.000% |
10.890% |
|
Severe Governance Controversies (%)
|
|
|
Environmental Responsible Scores
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average Carbon Intensity (Tons of CO2e / $M Sales)
|
798.04 |
96.61 |
|
Fossil Fuel Reserves (%)
|
|
|
|
High Impact Fossil Fuel Reserves (%)
|
|
|
|
Water Stress High Risk Business Segment (%)
|
|
|
|
Water Stress High Risk Geography (%)
|
|
|
|
Water Stress Exposure Moderate (%)
|
|
|
|
Water Stress Exposure High (%)
|
|
|
|
Water Stress Exposure Low (%)
|
|
|
|
Revenue Exposure to Energy Efficiency (%)
|
|
|
|
Revenue Exposure to Alternative Energy (%)
|
|
|
|
Revenue Exposure to Green Building (%)
|
|
|
|
Revenue Exposure to Pollution Prevention (%)
|
|
|
|
Revenue Exposure to Water Sustainability (%)
|
|
|
Socially Responsible Scores
|
|
|
|
Revenue Exposure to Affordable Real Estate (%)
|
|
|
|
Revenue Exposure to Education (%)
|
|
|
|
Revenue Exposure to Major Disease Treatment (%)
|
|
|
|
Revenue Exposure to Nutrition (%)
|
|
|
|
Revenue Exposure to Sanitation (%)
|
|
|
|
Revenue Exposure to SME Finance (%)
|
|
|
|
Human Rights Norms Violation (%)
|
|
|
|
Human Rights Norms Violation OR Watch List (%)
|
|
|
|
Severe Human Rights Controversies (%)
|
|
|
|
Labor Norms Violation (%)
|
|
|
|
Labor Norms Violation OR Watch List (%)
|
|
|
|
Severe Labor Controversies (%)
|
|
|
|
Severe Customer Controversies (%)
|
|
|
|
Global Compact Compliance Violation (%)
|
|
|
|
Global Compact Compliance Violation OR Watch List (%)
|
|
|
|
Catholic Values Fail (%)
|
|
|
|
Islamic Non-Compliant (%)
|
|
|
|
Adult Entertainment Involvement (%)
|
|
|
|
Alcohol Involvement (%)
|
|
|
|
Gambling Involvement (%)
|
|
|
|
Nuclear Power Involvement (%)
|
|
|
|
Tobacco Involvement (%)
|
|
|
|
Weapons Involvement (%)
|
|
|
|
Controversies Weapons Involvement (%)
|
|
|
|
Civilian Firearms Involvement (%)
|
|
|
|
Civilian Firearms Retailer (%)
|
|
|
|
Civilian Firearms Producer (%)
|
|
|
|
Direct Predatory Lending Involvement (%)
|
|
|
|
Genetic Engineering Involvement (%)
|
|
|
Responsible Governance Scores
|
|
|
|
Board Flag (%)
|
|
|
|
Lack of Independent Board Majority (%)
|
|
|
|
Board Independence (0-25%) (%)
|
|
|
|
Board Independence (25-50%) (%)
|
|
|
|
Board Independence (50-75%) (%)
|
|
|
|
Board Independence (75-100%) (%)
|
|
|
|
No Female Directors (%)
|
|
|
|
Three OR More Female Directors (%)
|
|
|
|
Females Represent 30% of Directors (%)
|
|
|
|
Entrenched Board (%)
|
|
|
|
Overboarding (%)
|
|
|
|
Negative Director Votes (%)
|
|
|
|
Ownership AND Control Flag (%)
|
|
|
|
One Share One Vote (%)
|
|
|
|
No Annual Director Elections (%)
|
|
|
|
Does Not Use Majority Voting (%)
|
|
|
|
Significant Votes Against Pay Practices (%)
|
|
|
|
Controlling Shareholder (%)
|
|
|
|
Controlling Shareholder Concerns (%)
|
|
|
|
Cross Shareholdings (%)
|
|
|
|
Poison Pill (%)
|
|
|
|
Pay Flag (%)
|
|
|
|
No Pay Performance Link (%)
|
|
|
|
Lack of Internal Pay Equity (%)
|
|
|
|
Executive Pay Non-Disclosure (%)
|
|
|
|
Accounting Flag (%)
|
|
|
Technicals
Most of the main technical indicators are available to compare here. This includes moving
averages, MACD, RSI, bollinger bands, support and resistance levels, and more. Compare these
to figure out the best entry points from a technical setup perspective.
|
|
|
|
20 Day MA
|
$18.25 |
$568.11 |
|
60 Day MA
|
$17.69 |
$553.18 |
|
MACD 15 Period
|
0.12 |
6.31 |
|
MACD 100 Period
|
1.17 |
29.61 |
|
Williams % Range 10 Day
|
23.08 |
4.58 |
|
Williams % Range 20 Day
|
12.5 |
2.14 |
|
RSI 10 Day
|
58.7 |
65.62 |
|
RSI 20 Day
|
59.6 |
61.98 |
|
RSI 30 Day
|
59.43 |
60.22 |
|
Ultimate Oscillator
|
55.27 |
62.22 |
|
Lower Bollinger Band (10 Day)
|
$18.07 |
$566.29 |
|
Upper Bollinger Band (10 Day)
|
$18.57 |
$575.69 |
|
Lower Bollinger Band (20 Day)
|
$17.94 |
$557.57 |
|
Upper Bollinger Band (20 Day)
|
$18.53 |
$577.95 |
|
Lower Bollinger Band (30 Day)
|
$17.51 |
$542.57 |
|
Upper Bollinger Band (30 Day)
|
$18.62 |
$581.46 |
|
Support Level 1
|
$18.39 |
$573.89 |
|
Support Level 2
|
$18.37 |
$570.64 |
|
Resistance Level 1
|
$18.43 |
$579.05 |
|
Resistance Level 2
|
$18.45 |
$580.96 |
|
Stochastic Oscillator %D - 1 Day
|
83.44 |
72.65 |
|
Stochastic Oscillator %D - 5 Days
|
67.45 |
73.9 |
|
Stochastic Oscillator %K - 1 Day
|
75.05 |
64.94 |
|
Stochastic Oscillator %K - 5 Days
|
56.95 |
63.2 |
Database
Compare the ETF’s asset class metrics, region exposure, structure, inception date and many
more important database factors in the table below.
Other reasons to become an ETF Database Pro member:
-
Access to
50 all-ETF, fully-backtested model portfolios.
Whether you're a long-term, buy-and-hold investor or a more active trader looking to establish a tactical position, our collection of ETF Database Portfolios has something for everyone.
-
Objective, in-depth analysis and ranking of every ETF on six key metrics and overall rating. From historical performance to expenses to volatility, the
ETF Database Realtime Ratings
show how every ETF stacks up against the competition.
-
Get Actionable ETF Investment Ideas every week with
access to ETF Picks of the Month,
the monthly newsletter that combines technical and fundamental ETF analysis to identify compelling opportunities.
-
Enhanced ETF Screener download capabilities,
including the option to export results from this proprietary tool to a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet.
-
Additional export capabilities to Excel or csv on any
type,
category,
issuers,
or
index
page.
Analyst Take
Here’s what our ETF Database analysts have to say about QAT and SPY.
| QAT |
|
| SPY |
SPY is one of the largest and most heavily-traded ETFs in the world, offering exposure to one of the most well known equity benchmarks. While SPY certainly may have appeal to investors seeking to build a long-term portfolio and include large...
|
Realtime Ratings
The ETF Database Realtime Ratings allow advisors and investors to objectively compare ETFs based on
ratings of six key metrics as well as an Overall Rating.
|
|
|
|
Name
|
iShares MSCI Qatar ETF |
SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust |
|
Liquidity
|
N/A |
N/A |
|
Expenses
|
N/A |
N/A |
|
Returns
|
|
|
|
Volatility
|
|
|
|
Dividend
|
|
|
|
Concentration
|
|
|
|
Overall
|
|
|
Brought to You by VettaFi
Copyright © 2024 FactSet Research Systems Inc. All rights reserved.
Copyright MSCI ESG Research LLC [2018]. All Rights Reserved. MSCI ESG Research LLC’s (“MSCI ESG”) Fund Metrics products (the “Information”) provide environmental, social and governance data with respect to underlying securities within more than 23,000 multi-asset class Mutual Funds and ETFs globally. MSCI ESG is a Registered Investment Adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. MSCI ESG materials have not been submitted, to nor received approval from, the US SEC or any other regulatory body. None of the information constitutes an offer to buy or sell, or a promotion or recommendation of, any security, financial instrument or product or trading strategy, nor should it be taken as an indication or guarantee of any future performance, analysis, forecast or prediction. None of the Information can be used to determine which securities to buy or sell or when to buy or sell them. The Information is provided “as is” and the user of the Information assumes the entire risk of any use it may make or permit to be made of the Information. All Information is provided solely for your internal use, and may not be reproduced or redisseminated in any form without express prior written permission from MSCI. Neither MSCI ESG nor any of its affiliates or any third party involved in or related to creating any Information makes any express or implied warranties, representations or guarantees, and in no event will MSCI ESG or any such affiliate or third party have any liability for any direct, indirect, special, punitive, consequential or any other damages (including lost profits) relating to any Information. More information on MSCI ESG Fund Metrics, provided by MSCI ESG Research LLC, can be found at
https://www.msci.com/esg-fund-metrics.
© 2024
Market data provided is at least 15-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions.
Information is provided 'as is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use, please see
disclaimer.
