ETFdb Logo
  • ETF Database
  • Content Hubs
    • Themes
      • Active ETF
      • Alternatives
      • Artificial Intelligence
      • China Insights
      • Core Strategies
      • Crypto
      • Disruptive Technology
      • Energy Infrastructure
      • ETF Building Blocks
      • ETF Investing
      • ETF Strategist
      • Financial Literacy
      • Fixed Income
      • Free Cash Flow
      • Future ETFs
      • Innovative ETFs
      • Institutional Income Strategies
      • Leveraged & Inverse
      • Market Insights
      • Market Outlooks
      • Modern Alpha
      • Nuclear Energy
      • Portfolio Strategies
      • Sector Investing
      • Tax Efficient Income
      • Thematic Investing
    • Asset Class
      • Equity
        • U.S. Equity
        • Int'l Developed
        • Emerging Market Equities
      • Alternatives
        • Gold/Silver/Critical Materials
        • Cryptocurrency
        • Currency
        • Volatility
      • Fixed Income
        • Investment Grade Corporates
        • US Treasuries & TIPS
        • High Yield Corporates
        • Int'l Fixed Income
    • ETF Ecosystem
    • ETFs in Canada
    • Market Outlook
    • Crypto ETF Hub
  • Tools
    • ETF Screener
    • ETF Country Exposure Tool
    • ETF Database Categories
    • Indexes
    • Scenario Analysis
    • Watchlists
    • Head-To-Head ETF Comparison Tool
    • Mutual Fund To ETF Converter
    • ETF Stock Exposure Tool
    • ETF Issuer Fund Flows
  • Research
    • ETF Education
    • Equity Investing
    • Dividend ETFs
    • Leveraged ETFs
    • Inverse ETFs
    • Index Education
    • Index Insights
    • Top ETF Sectors
    • Top ETF Issuers
    • Top ETF Industries
  • Webcasts
  • Sectors
    • Sector Investing Content Hub
    • XLK
    • XLI
    • XLU
    • XLY
    • XLP
    • XLRE
    • Sector Power Rankings
    • XLE
    • XLC
    • XLF
    • XLV
    • XLB
  • Multimedia
    • ETF 360 Video Series
    • ETF of the Week Podcast
    • Gaining Perspective Podcast
    • ETF Prime Podcast
    • Video
  • Company
    • About VettaFi
    • Get VettaFi’ed
  • PRO
    • Pro Content
    • Pro Tools
    • Advanced
    • FAQ
    • Free sign up
    • Login
  1. Active ETF Content Hub
  2. 2 T. Rowe Price ETFs Lead Early 2026 Results
Active ETF Content Hub
Share

2 T. Rowe Price ETFs Lead Early 2026 Results

DJ ShawFeb 10, 2026
2026-02-10

Two T. Rowe Price ETFs have emerged as early leaders within the firm’s exchange-traded product lineup, with one fund posting the strongest performance and another drawing the most investor money among the company’s offerings, according to ETF Database.

The T. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF (TURF ) has returned 16.1% year-to-date as of February 10 to lead T. Rowe Price ETFs in performance. Meanwhile, the T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Bond ETF (TAGG ) pulled in $233.08 million in net inflows to top the firm’s flows through the first weeks of the year, the data shows.

The success of these two T. Rowe Price ETFs reflects distinct investment themes gaining traction this year: a rally in commodities and a shift toward smarter fixed income strategies that move beyond passive indexing.

TURF focuses on upstream natural resource companies that explore, extract, and develop commodities across energy, agriculture, metals, and minerals. The fund’s portfolio managers, led by Rick de los Reyes, shift allocations based on where they identify the best supply and demand dynamics, according to T. Rowe Price.

The strategy aims to capitalize on commodity cycles by focusing on upstream companies, according to the firm. By concentrating on companies that actually own and develop resources rather than tracking commodity futures, TURF maintains flexibility to rotate based on supply and demand dynamics across different natural resource sectors.

The $19.2 million fund launched in June 2025 and carries a 0.44% expense ratio, ETF Database data shows.

Active Approach Draws Bond Investors

TAGG took a different path to lead T. Rowe Price ETF flows, attracting investors seeking alternatives to traditional bond indexing. The $1.77 billion fund uses what T. Rowe Price calls a “core plus” approach, attempting to beat the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index through quantitative models combined with fundamental credit research.

The strategy emphasizes subsectors that have historically generated stronger risk-adjusted returns, according to T. Rowe Price. That means overweighting shorter-maturity corporate bonds and securitized credit while underweighting long-term corporates.

The fund uses a dual-engine approach that combines quantitative models to match the benchmark’s risk profile with fundamental credit research to select individual bonds, according to the firm. Credit analysts work to identify bonds that appear undervalued and screen out potential credit problems.

TAGG incepted in September 2021 and the active strategy has a very competitive 0.08% expense ratio which is below some passive index strategies. Its one-year return reached 7.2%, according to ETF Database.

For more news, information, and analysis, visit our Active ETF Content Hub.


Content continues below advertisement

Loading Articles...

Advertisement

Is Your Portfolio Positioned With Enough Global Exposure?

ETF Education Channel

How to Allocate Commodities in Portfolios

Tom LydonApr 26, 2022
2022-04-26

A long-running debate in asset allocation circles is how much of a portfolio an investor should...

Core Strategies Channel

Why ETFs Experience Limit Up/Down Protections

Karrie GordonMay 13, 2022
2022-05-13

In a digital age where information moves in milliseconds and millions of participants can transact...

}
X