Are you getting the best rate from your broker?
Compare your broker's rates now to find out if you can save money

Choose your broker below
Welcome to ETFdb.com. Please help us personalize your experience.

Select the one that best describes you
  • ETF
  • XLB
    Pricing Data
    $59.33
    Change: $0.75 (-0.01%)
    Time: 11/20/19
    Previous Close: $60.08
  • Category
  • Materials
  • ESG Score
Last Updated:

Profile

Vitals

Trading Data

Open: - Volume -
Day Lo - Day Hi -
  • 52 Week Lo: $46.34
  • 52 Week Hi: $60.81
  • AUM: $3,471.9 M
  • Shares: 57.8 M

Investment Themes

Historical Trading Data

  • 1 Month Avg. Volume: 4,168,275
  • 3 Month Avg. Volume: 5,235,983

Alternative ETFs in the Materials Category

Type Ticker Expense Ratio Assets Avg. Daily Vol YTD Return
Cheapest FMAT 0.08% $196.0 M 27,432 18.40%
Largest (AUM) GDX 0.53% $12,011.9 M 62,375,884 29.63%
Most Liquid (Volume) GDX 0.53% $12,011.9 M 62,375,884 29.63%
Top YTD Performer GOAU 0.60% $36.2 M 76,088 38.91%

Analyst Report

This ETF is one of several funds offering exposure to the U.S. materials sector, a corner of the market that may be appealing for investors looking to gain indirect exposure to commodity prices through the stocks of companies engaged in the extraction or production of natural resources. Because the materials sector often accounts for a small portion of broad-based benchmarks, XLB may be a useful tool for long-term investors looking for more balanced exposure to the U.S. equity market. It can also be handy for those looking to implement a shorter-term tilt towards the materials sector. Like most Sector SPDRs, XLB's appeal lies in its cost efficiency and liquidity; it is among the cheapest funds in the Materials ETFdb Category, and has a higher average daily volume than any comparable fund. XLB is, however, somewhat concentrated; it has far fewer holdings than funds such as VAW, and allocations to the biggest components are significant. The equal-weighted RTM may have some appeal to those seeking more balanced representation of the materials sector, while IRV could be appealing as an international option.

Realtime Rating

Sign Up for Pro to Unlock Data Sign Up

Realtime Rating Summary

The adjacent table gives investors an individual Realtime Rating for XLB on several different metrics, including liquidity, expenses, performance, volatility, dividend, concentration of holdings in addition to an overall rating. The "A+ Metric Rated ETF" field, available to ETFdb Pro members, shows the ETF in the Materials with the highest Metric Realtime Rating for each individual field. To view all of this data, sign up for a free 14-day trial for ETFdb Pro. To view information on how the ETFdb Realtime Ratings work, click here.

Compare to another ETF

View the Category Report

XLB Overall Realtime Rating:

A+ Overall Rated ETF:

Metric Metric Realtime Rating A+ Metric Rated ETF
Liquidity A+ n/a
Expenses A n/a
Performance
Volatility
Dividend
Concentration

XLB In-Depth Analysis

The following tables and charts contain in-depth metrics for this ETF and compare it to similar peer ETFs within its ETFdb.com Category.

XLB Holdings

Filings Data as of: Nov 19, 2019

Concentration Analysis

This section compares how balanced and deep this ETF is relative to the peer group ETFdb.com Category.

Number of Holdings
Rank: 21 of 28
29
Category Low WOOD (26)
Category High PICK (190)
% Assets in Top 10
Rank: 22 of 28
65.07%
Category Low MXI (32.01%)
Category High SIL (77.17%)
% Assets in Top 15
Rank: 8 of 28
78.19%
Category Low MXI (41.21%)
Category High SIL (91.16%)
% Assets in Top 50
Rank: 22 of 28
100.00%
Category Low PICK (74.08%)
Category High JHMA (100.01%)

Asset Allocation

Asset Percentage
Common equity 100.0%
ETF Cash Component 0.0%

Sector Breakdown

Sector Percentage
Basic Materials 66.6%
Other 33.4%
ETF Cash Component 0.0%

Market Cap Breakdown

Market Cap Percentage
Large cap 65.07%
Mid cap 34.06%
Small cap 0.87%
ETF Cash Component 0.0%

Region Breakdown

Region Percentage
North America 77.89%
Europe 22.11%
ETF Cash Component 0.0%

Market Tier Breakdown

Region Percentage
United States 77.89%
Developed Markets (ex-US) 22.11%
ETF Cash Component 0.0%

Country Breakdown

Country Percentage
United States 77.89%
United Kingdom 22.11%
ETF Cash Component 0.0%

XLB Expenses & Fees

This section compares the cost efficiency of this ETF to peers in the same ETFdb.com Category.

Expenses Ratio Analysis

ETF Average
0.542%
ETF Wtd. Average
0.19%
Category Average
0.48%
Expense Ratio
Rank: 3 of 28
0.13%
Category Low FMAT (0.08%)
Category High BATT (0.72%)

Commission Free Trading

This ETF is not currently available for commission free trading on any platforms.

Category Commission Free Trading

There are 19 other ETFs in the Materials ETFdb.com Category that are also eligible for commission free trading:

XLB ESG Themes and Scores
  • 5.72/10
    ESG Score
  • 57.34%
    ESG Score Global Percentile (%)
  • 62.69%
    ESG Score Peer Percentile (%)
    • Revenue Exposure to Environmental Impact (%)

      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Severe Environment Controversies (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Sustainable Impact Solutions (%)
      1.89%

      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Weighted Average Carbon Intensity (Tons of CO2e / $M Sales)
      851.26

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Fossil Fuel Reserves (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • High Impact Fossil Fuel Reserves (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Water Stress High Risk Business Segment (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Water Stress High Risk Geography (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Water Stress Exposure Moderate (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Water Stress Exposure High (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Water Stress Exposure Low (%)

      Higher improves ESG score
    • Revenue Exposure to Energy Efficiency (%)

      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Revenue Exposure to Alternative Energy (%)

      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Revenue Exposure to Green Building (%)

      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Revenue Exposure to Pollution Prevention (%)

      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Revenue Exposure to Water Sustainability (%)

      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Revenue Exposure to Social Impact (%)

      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Sustainable Impact Solutions (%)
      1.89%

      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • SRI Exclusion Criteria (%)
      3.41%

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Revenue Exposure to Affordable Real Estate (%)

      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Revenue Exposure to Education (%)

      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Revenue Exposure to Major Disease Treatment (%)

      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Revenue Exposure to Nutrition (%)

      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Revenue Exposure to Sanitation (%)

      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Revenue Exposure to SME Finance (%)

      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Human Rights Norms Violation (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Human Rights Norms Violation OR Watch List (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Severe Human Rights Controversies (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Labor Norms Violation (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Labor Norms Violation OR Watch List (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Severe Labor Controversies (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Severe Customer Controversies (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Global Compact Compliance Violation (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Global Compact Compliance Violation OR Watch List (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Catholic Values Fail (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Islamic Non-Compliant (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Adult Entertainment Involvement (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Alcohol Involvement (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Gambling Involvement (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Nuclear Power Involvement (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Tobacco Involvement (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Weapons Involvement (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Controversies Weapons Involvement (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Civilian Firearms Involvement (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Civilian Firearms Retailer (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Civilian Firearms Producer (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Direct Predatory Lending Involvement (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Genetic Engineering Involvement (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Severe Governance Controversies (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Board Flag (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Lack of Independent Board Majority (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Board Independence (0-25%) (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Board Independence (25-50%) (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Board Independence (50-75%) (%)

      Higher improves ESG score
    • Board Independence (75-100%) (%)

      Higher improves ESG score
    • No Female Directors (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Three OR More Female Directors (%)

      Higher improves ESG score
    • Females Represent 30% of Directors (%)

      Higher improves ESG score
    • Entrenched Board (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Overboarding (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Negative Director Votes (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Ownership AND Control Flag (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • One Share One Vote (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • No Annual Director Elections (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Does Not Use Majority Voting (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Significant Votes Against Pay Practices (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Controlling Shareholder (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Controlling Shareholder Concerns (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Cross Shareholdings (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Poison Pill (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Pay Flag (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • No Pay Performance Link (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Lack of Internal Pay Equity (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Executive Pay Non-Disclosure (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Accounting Flag (%)

      Lower improves ESG score

XLB Performance

This section shows how this ETF has performed relative to its peer group ETFdb.com Category.

1 Week Return
Rank: 21 of 28
-1.18%
Category Low SOIL (-4.19%)
Category High SILJ (2.80%)
4 Week Return
Rank: 10 of 28
3.27%
Category Low SOIL (-3.52%)
Category High SILJ (9.57%)
13 Week Return
Rank: 16 of 28
5.18%
Category Low GOEX (-9.00%)
Category High WOOD (19.05%)
26 Week Return
Rank: 15 of 28
10.42%
Category Low BATT (-7.02%)
Category High SILJ (52.89%)
Year to Date Return
Rank: 12 of 28
19.24%
Category Low BATT (-10.51%)
Category High GOAU (38.91%)
1 Year Return
Rank: 11 of 28
13.42%
Category Low BATT (-18.04%)
Category High GOAU (52.37%)
3 Year Return
Rank: 5 of 26
30.32%
Category Low SILJ (-13.91%)
Category High WOOD (34.19%)
5 Year Return
Rank: 7 of 24
31.77%
Category Low COPX (-18.99%)
Category High GOEX (76.32%)

XLB Fund Flows

This section compares the fund flows of this ETF to peers in the same ETFdb.com Category.

1 Week Fund Flow
Rank: 9 of 9
‑$144.4 M
Category Low XLB (‑$144.4 M)
Category High GDXJ ($90.5 M)
4 Week Fund Flow
Rank: 18 of 18
‑$56.6 M
Category Low XLB (‑$56.6 M)
Category High GDX ($767.2 M)
13 Week Fund Flow
Rank: 26 of 26
‑$862.1 M
Category Low XLB (‑$862.1 M)
Category High GDX ($1,249.9 M)
26 Week Fund Flow
Rank: 27 of 27
‑$141.3 M
Category Low XLB (‑$141.3 M)
Category High GDX ($493.6 M)
Year to Date Fund Flow
Rank: 26 of 27
‑$786.4 M
Category Low GDX (‑$1,055.4 M)
Category High SIL ($98.2 M)
1 Year Fund Flow
Rank: 28 of 28
‑$982.6 M
Category Low XLB (‑$982.6 M)
Category High SIL ($120.9 M)
3 Year Fund Flow
Rank: 28 of 28
‑$661.9 M
Category Low XLB (‑$661.9 M)
Category High GDXJ ($1,045.8 M)
5 Year Fund Flow
Rank: 27 of 28
‑$288.3 M
Category Low IYM (‑$406.9 M)
Category High GDX ($3,676.5 M)

Brought to You by ETF Flows


Charts

The following charts can be customized to display historical performance in a number of different formats, including line charts, bar charts, and candlesticks. Time periods can be adjusted to increase or decrease the period shown, ranging from five minutes to several months.

The following chart also includes the option to compare the performance of XLB relative to other ETFs and benchmarks or to include indicators such as Bollinger Bands, relative strength, and moving averages.

XLB Valuation

This section shows how the P/E multiple of this ETF compares to the peer group ETFdb.com Category.

P/E Ratio
Rank: 19 of 27
18.73
Category Low SLX (5.28)
Category High RING (41.35)

XLB Dividend

This section shows how the dividend yield of this ETF compares to the peer group ETFdb.com Category.

Dividend
$0.29
Dividend Date
2019-09-20
Annual Dividend Rate
$1.20
Annual Dividend Yield
Rank: 9 of 27
2.00%
Category Low GOEX (0.06%)
Category High SLX (6.20%)

XLB Technicals

Volatility Analysis

This section shows how the volatility of this ETF compares to the peer group ETFdb.com Category.

5 Day Volatility
Rank: 23 of 28
87.23%
Category Low JHMA (20.60%)
Category High XME (282.37%)
20 Day Volatility
Rank: 25 of 28
10.26%
Category Low MXI (9.43%)
Category High GDXJ (28.07%)
50 Day Volatility
Rank: 24 of 28
13.49%
Category Low MXI (11.91%)
Category High SILJ (38.40%)
200 Day Volatility
Rank: 27 of 28
15.35%
Category Low MXI (14.30%)
Category High SILJ (42.00%)
Beta
Rank: 14 of 28
1.16
Category Low GDX (-0.16)
Category High PSCM (1.68)
Standard Deviation
Rank: 12 of 28
2.83%
Category Low SOIL (0.34%)
Category High VAW (5.75%)

Technicals

  • 20 Day MA: $59.44
  • 60 Day MA: $57.92
  • MACD 15 Period: -0.45
  • MACD 100 Period: 1.65
  • Williams % Range 10 Day: 95.47
  • Williams % Range 20 Day: 42.32
  • RSI 10 Day: 48
  • RSI 20 Day: 55
  • RSI 30 Day: 55
  • Ultimate Oscillator: 47

Bollinger Brands

  • Lower Bollinger (10 Day): $59.59
  • Upper Bollinger (10 Day): $60.60
  • Lower Bollinger (20 Day): $57.75
  • Upper Bollinger (20 Day): $61.06
  • Lower Bollinger (30 Day): $56.24
  • Upper Bollinger (30 Day): $61.16

Support & Resistance

  • Support Level 1: $59.07
  • Support Level 2: $58.82
  • Resistance Level 1: $59.77
  • Resistance Level 2: $60.22

Stochastic

  • Stochastic Oscillator %D (1 Day): 34.15
  • Stochastic Oscillator %D (5 Day): 32.14
  • Stochastic Oscillator %K (1 Day): 48.14
  • Stochastic Oscillator %K (5 Day): 51.82

Fact Sheet

Fact sheets are issued by the ETF provider and framed by ETFdb.com. Information contained within the fact sheet is not guaranteed to be timely or accurate.

Source: LSEG Information Services (US), Inc. (“LSEG”) © LSEG 2016. All rights in the XTF data, ratings and / or underlying data contained in this communication (“the XTF information”) vest in LSEG and/or its licensors. Neither LSEG nor its licensors accept any liability arising out of the use of, reliance on or any errors or omissions in the XTF information. No further distribution of the XTF information is permitted without LSEG’s express written consent. LSEG does not promote, sponsor or endorse the content of this communication.

Copyright MSCI ESG Research LLC [2018]. All Rights Reserved. MSCI ESG Research LLC’s (“MSCI ESG”) Fund Metrics products (the “Information”) provide environmental, social and governance data with respect to underlying securities within more than 23,000 multi-asset class Mutual Funds and ETFs globally. MSCI ESG is a Registered Investment Adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. MSCI ESG materials have not been submitted, to nor received approval from, the US SEC or any other regulatory body. None of the information constitutes an offer to buy or sell, or a promotion or recommendation of, any security, financial instrument or product or trading strategy, nor should it be taken as an indication or guarantee of any future performance, analysis, forecast or prediction. None of the Information can be used to determine which securities to buy or sell or when to buy or sell them. The Information is provided “as is” and the user of the Information assumes the entire risk of any use it may make or permit to be made of the Information. All Information is provided solely for your internal use, and may not be reproduced or redisseminated in any form without express prior written permission from MSCI. Neither MSCI ESG nor any of its affiliates or any third party involved in or related to creating any Information makes any express or implied warranties, representations or guarantees, and in no event will MSCI ESG or any such affiliate or third party have any liability for any direct, indirect, special, punitive, consequential or any other damages (including lost profits) relating to any Information. More information on MSCI ESG Fund Metrics, provided by MSCI ESG Research LLC, can be found at https://www.msci.com/esg-fund-metrics.
© 2019 Market data provided is at least 15-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions.

Information is provided 'as is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use, please see disclaimer.