ETFdb Logo
  • ETF Database
  • Content Hubs
    • Themes
      • Active ETF
      • Alternatives
      • Artificial Intelligence
      • China Insights
      • Core Strategies
      • Crypto
      • Disruptive Technology
      • Energy Infrastructure
      • ETF Building Blocks
      • ETF Investing
      • ETF Strategist
      • Financial Literacy
      • Fixed Income
      • Free Cash Flow
      • Future ETFs
      • Innovative ETFs
      • Institutional Income Strategies
      • Leveraged & Inverse
      • Market Insights
      • Market Outlooks
      • Modern Alpha
      • Nuclear Energy
      • Portfolio Strategies
      • Sector Investing
      • Tax Efficient Income
      • Thematic Investing
    • Asset Class
      • Equity
        • U.S. Equity
        • Int'l Developed
        • Emerging Market Equities
      • Alternatives
        • Gold/Silver/Critical Materials
        • Cryptocurrency
        • Currency
        • Volatility
      • Fixed Income
        • Investment Grade Corporates
        • US Treasuries & TIPS
        • High Yield Corporates
        • Int'l Fixed Income
    • ETF Ecosystem
    • ETFs in Canada
    • Market Outlook
    • Crypto ETF Hub
  • Tools
    • ETF Screener
    • ETF Country Exposure Tool
    • ETF Database Categories
    • Indexes
    • Scenario Analysis
    • Watchlists
    • Head-To-Head ETF Comparison Tool
    • Mutual Fund To ETF Converter
    • ETF Stock Exposure Tool
    • ETF Issuer Fund Flows
  • Research
    • ETF Education
    • Equity Investing
    • Dividend ETFs
    • Leveraged ETFs
    • Inverse ETFs
    • Index Education
    • Index Insights
    • Top ETF Sectors
    • Top ETF Issuers
    • Top ETF Industries
  • Webcasts
  • Sectors
    • Sector Investing Content Hub
    • XLK
    • XLI
    • XLU
    • XLY
    • XLP
    • XLRE
    • Sector Power Rankings
    • XLE
    • XLC
    • XLF
    • XLV
    • XLB
  • Multimedia
    • ETF 360 Video Series
    • ETF of the Week Podcast
    • Gaining Perspective Podcast
    • ETF Prime Podcast
    • Video
  • Company
    • About VettaFi
    • Get VettaFi’ed
  • PRO
    • Pro Content
    • Pro Tools
    • Advanced
    • FAQ
    • Free sign up
    • Login
  1. Crypto Content Hub
  2. Regulatory Clarity Emerges for Crypto Miners
Crypto Content Hub
Share

Regulatory Clarity Emerges for Crypto Miners

Todd ShriberMar 24, 2025
2025-03-24

Shares of crypto miners, including those residing in ETFs like the CoinShares Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF (WGMI A-), often see their price action dictated by bitcoin, but there are other factors at plays.

One factor is the regulatory environment. The industry itself is young, but has encountered myriad regulatory resistance over the years. The implication there is that miners, including WGMI holdings, can derive benefit from added regulatory clarity. Some of that recently emerged when the Securities and Exchange Commission noted proof-of-work (PoW) mining activities aren’t considered securities trading.

That’s relevant to investors considering bitcoin or WGMI. And that’s because bitcoin is a (PoW) asset, as is dogecoin. Some other large, well-known digital currencies are also PoW.

SEC Mentions Howey Test

In deliberating about PoW mining constituting securities trading in the traditional sense, the SEC mentioned the Howey Test. That’s a reference the 1946 Supreme Court case SEC v. W.J. Howey Co. That case set standards for determining whether specific assets are securities.

“In evaluating the economic realities of a transaction, the test is whether there is an investment of money in an enterprise premised on a reasonable expectation of profits to be derived from the entrepreneurial or managerial efforts of others,” according to the commission. “Federal courts since Howey have explained that Howey’s ‘efforts of others’ requirement is satisfied when ‘the efforts made by those other than the investor are the undeniably significant ones, those essential managerial efforts which affect the failure or success of the enterprise.’”

It’s important for investors to know how the SEC views mining activities in relation to traditional securities. In short, the commission doesn’t see parallels between mining itself. Nor do they view the rewards accrued by those companies as comparable to a security in the strictest sense.

Put simply, miners and operators of mining pools aren’t under the jurisdiction of the Securities Act. They also don’t need to register with the SEC as if they were.

“A miner’s expectation to receive Rewards is not derived from any third party’s managerial or entrepreneurial efforts upon which the network’s success depends. Instead, the expected financial incentive from the protocol is derived from the administrative or ministerial act of Protocol Mining performed by the miner,” added the commission. “As such, Rewards are payments to the miner in exchange for services it provides to the network rather than profits derived from the entrepreneurial or managerial efforts of others.”


Content continues below advertisement

For more news, information, and analysis, visit the Crypto Channel.

Loading Articles...

Advertisement

Is Your Portfolio Positioned With Enough Global Exposure?

ETF Education Channel

How to Allocate Commodities in Portfolios

Tom LydonApr 26, 2022
2022-04-26

A long-running debate in asset allocation circles is how much of a portfolio an investor should...

Core Strategies Channel

Why ETFs Experience Limit Up/Down Protections

Karrie GordonMay 13, 2022
2022-05-13

In a digital age where information moves in milliseconds and millions of participants can transact...

}
X