ETFdb Logo
  • ETF Database
  • Content Hubs
    • Themes
      • Active ETF
      • Alternatives
      • Artificial Intelligence
      • China Insights
      • Core Strategies
      • Crypto
      • Disruptive Technology
      • Energy Infrastructure
      • ETF Building Blocks
      • ETF Investing
      • ETF Strategist
      • Financial Literacy
      • Fixed Income
      • Free Cash Flow
      • Future ETFs
      • Innovative ETFs
      • Institutional Income Strategies
      • Leveraged & Inverse
      • Market Insights
      • Market Outlooks
      • Modern Alpha
      • Nuclear Energy
      • Portfolio Strategies
      • Sector Investing
      • Tax Efficient Income
      • Thematic Investing
    • Asset Class
      • Equity
        • U.S. Equity
        • Int'l Developed
        • Emerging Market Equities
      • Alternatives
        • Gold/Silver/Critical Materials
        • Cryptocurrency
        • Currency
        • Volatility
      • Fixed Income
        • Investment Grade Corporates
        • US Treasuries & TIPS
        • High Yield Corporates
        • Int'l Fixed Income
    • ETF Ecosystem
    • ETFs in Canada
    • Market Outlook
    • Crypto ETF Hub
  • Tools
    • ETF Screener
    • ETF Country Exposure Tool
    • ETF Database Categories
    • Indexes
    • Scenario Analysis
    • Watchlists
    • Head-To-Head ETF Comparison Tool
    • Mutual Fund To ETF Converter
    • ETF Stock Exposure Tool
    • ETF Issuer Fund Flows
  • Research
    • ETF Education
    • Equity Investing
    • Dividend ETFs
    • Leveraged ETFs
    • Inverse ETFs
    • Index Education
    • Index Insights
    • Top ETF Sectors
    • Top ETF Issuers
    • Top ETF Industries
  • Webcasts
  • Sectors
    • Sector Investing Content Hub
    • XLK
    • XLI
    • XLU
    • XLY
    • XLP
    • XLRE
    • Sector Power Rankings
    • XLE
    • XLC
    • XLF
    • XLV
    • XLB
  • Multimedia
    • ETF 360 Video Series
    • ETF of the Week Podcast
    • Gaining Perspective Podcast
    • ETF Prime Podcast
    • Video
  • Company
    • About VettaFi
    • Get VettaFi’ed
  • PRO
    • Pro Content
    • Pro Tools
    • Advanced
    • FAQ
    • Free sign up
    • Login
  1. Equity ETF Content Hub
  2. Fees Matter: The Power of Passive ETFs
Equity ETF Content Hub
Share

Fees Matter: The Power of Passive ETFs

Nick WodeshickJun 09, 2026
2026-06-09

Folks often talk about how momentum in the ETF community continues to grow towards actively managed funds. After all, per Goldman Sachs and Morningstar, almost a third of fund flows in the U.S. went to active ETFs in lieu of passive peers. 

Key Takeaways:

  • Enthusiasm is certainly mounting towards actively managed funds, but passive ETFs still provide plenty of distinct perks within a variety of portfolios.
  • One key advantage is low fees — passive funds tend to carry significantly lower expense ratios, and a recent Morningstar Study showed that passive ETFs and mutual funds saw their asset-weighted average expense ratios drop by 5.4% in 2025.
  • Plenty of ETFs, like the iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV), show how passive strategies can put up highly compelling results while charging competitively low fees.

Sure, there are plenty of reasons for investors to gravitate toward active ETFs. Not only is the potential of outperforming an index motivating, but active ETFs could offer higher flexibility in moments of uncertainty, such as the period we currently find ourselves in. 

However, investors may not be considering how fund fees are eating into their bottom line. After all, even with a fairly effective strategy, if a fund charges an expensive fee, its investment base will see trimmed-down returns. Historically speaking, passive ETFs have excelled in this front, given that active ETFs tend to charge much higher fees. 

See More: The SpaceX Effect: How Mega-Cap IPOs Reshape Index Methodologies


Content continues below advertisement

The Passive Fund Fee Gap Widened in 2025

Earlier this year, Morningstar released its 2026 Annual US Find Fee Study, examining how fund fees shifted across the course of 2025. Notably, the report estimated that investors saved about $6.8 billion in fund expenses across both mutual funds and ETFs, due to the average expense ratio dropping from 0.34% in 2024 to 0.32% in 2025.

While fund fees fell across the board for both passive and active funds, Morningstar noted that passive funds fell at a far more noticeable pace. Active funds saw their asset-weighted average expense ratios drop by 2.7% during 2025, while passive funds saw their expense ratios come down by 5.4% in the same period. 

See More: Wellington Announces Plan to Buy Hartford Funds for $1.9B

This study showcases that low fees — already a significant advantage that passive ETFs offer — are only growing more potent as time passes. While active ETFs may offer some attractive perks, passive funds provide access to time-tested indexes, oftentimes with the added benefit of a low barrier to entry.

IVV: The Potency of Passive Funds in Action

The iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV A) is but one of many examples of compelling passive funds with low expense ratios. With an expense ratio of only 3 basis points, this fund provides exposure to the companies within the S&P 500. 

As of May 31, 2026, IVV has a year to date total return of 11.25%. Combined with a low fee, this fund is showing why passive ETFs still deserve a slot in today’s portfolio. 

For more news, information, and analysis, visit the Equity ETF Content Hub.

Loading Articles...

Advertisement

Is Your Portfolio Positioned With Enough Global Exposure?

ETF Education Channel

How to Allocate Commodities in Portfolios

Tom LydonApr 26, 2022
2022-04-26

A long-running debate in asset allocation circles is how much of a portfolio an investor should...

Core Strategies Channel

Why ETFs Experience Limit Up/Down Protections

Karrie GordonMay 13, 2022
2022-05-13

In a digital age where information moves in milliseconds and millions of participants can transact...

}
X