ETFdb Logo
  • ETF Database
  • Content Hubs
    • Themes
      • Active ETF
      • Alternatives
      • Artificial Intelligence
      • China Insights
      • Core Strategies
      • Crypto
      • Disruptive Technology
      • Energy Infrastructure
      • ETF Building Blocks
      • ETF Investing
      • ETF Strategist
      • Financial Literacy
      • Fixed Income
      • Free Cash Flow
      • Future ETFs
      • Innovative ETFs
      • Institutional Income Strategies
      • Leveraged & Inverse
      • Market Insights
      • Market Outlooks
      • Modern Alpha
      • Nuclear Energy
      • Portfolio Strategies
      • Sector Investing
      • Tax Efficient Income
      • Thematic Investing
    • Asset Class
      • Equity
        • U.S. Equity
        • Int'l Developed
        • Emerging Market Equities
      • Alternatives
        • Gold/Silver/Critical Materials
        • Cryptocurrency
        • Currency
        • Volatility
      • Fixed Income
        • Investment Grade Corporates
        • US Treasuries & TIPS
        • High Yield Corporates
        • Int'l Fixed Income
    • ETF Ecosystem
    • ETFs in Canada
    • Market Outlook
    • Crypto ETF Hub
  • Tools
    • ETF Screener
    • ETF Country Exposure Tool
    • ETF Database Categories
    • Indexes
    • Scenario Analysis
    • Watchlists
    • Head-To-Head ETF Comparison Tool
    • Mutual Fund To ETF Converter
    • ETF Stock Exposure Tool
    • ETF Issuer Fund Flows
  • Research
    • ETF Education
    • Equity Investing
    • Dividend ETFs
    • Leveraged ETFs
    • Inverse ETFs
    • Index Education
    • Index Insights
    • Top ETF Sectors
    • Top ETF Issuers
    • Top ETF Industries
  • Webcasts
  • Sectors
    • Sector Investing Content Hub
    • XLK
    • XLI
    • XLU
    • XLY
    • XLP
    • XLRE
    • Sector Power Rankings
    • XLE
    • XLC
    • XLF
    • XLV
    • XLB
  • Multimedia
    • ETF 360 Video Series
    • ETF of the Week Podcast
    • Gaining Perspective Podcast
    • ETF Prime Podcast
    • Video
  • Company
    • About VettaFi
    • Get VettaFi’ed
  • PRO
    • Pro Content
    • Pro Tools
    • Advanced
    • FAQ
    • Free sign up
    • Login
  1. ETF Building Blocks Content Hub
  2. How ALPS’ Disruptive Technologies ETF Compares to XLK
ETF Building Blocks Content Hub
Share

How ALPS’ Disruptive Technologies ETF Compares to XLK

Elle Caruso FitzgeraldDec 08, 2023
2023-12-08

SS&C ALPS Advisors’ disruptive technologies ETF provides notably different exposure than a broad tech sector fund.

The differences in composition between ALPS’ fund versus the broad benchmark could be seen in last month’s performance. The ALPS Disruptive Technologies ETF (DTEC B) climbed 15.80% in November, while the Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK A) gained 10.75%

See more: ALPS’ Disruptive Technologies ETF Outpaced Broad Tech Sector in November

Whereas XLK aims to offer broad tech sector exposure, DTEC delivers exposure to companies using disruptive technologies. This includes companies that are entering traditional markets with new digital forms of production and distribution, that seek to disrupt an existing market and value network, displace established market-leading firms, products and alliances, and increasingly gain market share, according to ALPS.

DTEC focuses exposure on 10 disruptive technology themes. These include cybersecurity; mobile payments; data and analytics; fintech; robotics and artificial intelligence; internet of things; cloud computing; 3D printing; clean energy and smart grid; and healthcare innovation.

DTEC selects 10 companies from each theme according to a proprietary model and equally weights each security. This effectively gives each theme and each company equal representation.

How DTEC's Portfolio Compares to XLK

DTEC’s equal-weight methodology results in more balanced exposure to the sector. This is particularly impactful in the tech sector, which is notorious for being highly concentrated in just a few mega-cap names.

The ETF holds 99 securities as of December 7, with just 12.9% of the fund by weight in the top 10 names. In comparison, XLK comprises 66 holdings, with 70.5% of the fund by weight in the top 10 names.

XLK focuses exposure on large-cap companies, whereas DTEC provides exposure down the cap spectrum. Large-cap names make up 62.5% of ALPS’ disruptive technologies ETF by weight, with 29.9% and 7.5% of the fund in mid- and small-cap names, respectively.

For more news, information, and analysis, visit the ETF Building Blocks Channel.


Content continues below advertisement

Loading Articles...

Advertisement

Is Your Portfolio Positioned With Enough Global Exposure?

ETF Education Channel

How to Allocate Commodities in Portfolios

Tom LydonApr 26, 2022
2022-04-26

A long-running debate in asset allocation circles is how much of a portfolio an investor should...

Core Strategies Channel

Why ETFs Experience Limit Up/Down Protections

Karrie GordonMay 13, 2022
2022-05-13

In a digital age where information moves in milliseconds and millions of participants can transact...

}
X