ETFdb Logo
  • ETF Database
  • Content Hubs
    • Themes
      • Active ETF
      • Alternatives
      • Artificial Intelligence
      • China Insights
      • Core Strategies
      • Crypto
      • Disruptive Technology
      • Energy Infrastructure
      • ETF Building Blocks
      • ETF Investing
      • ETF Strategist
      • Financial Literacy
      • Fixed Income
      • Free Cash Flow
      • Future ETFs
      • Innovative ETFs
      • Institutional Income Strategies
      • Leveraged & Inverse
      • Market Insights
      • Market Outlooks
      • Modern Alpha
      • Nuclear Energy
      • Portfolio Strategies
      • Sector Investing
      • Tax Efficient Income
      • Thematic Investing
    • Asset Class
      • Equity
        • U.S. Equity
        • Int'l Developed
        • Emerging Market Equities
      • Alternatives
        • Gold/Silver/Critical Materials
        • Cryptocurrency
        • Currency
        • Volatility
      • Fixed Income
        • Investment Grade Corporates
        • US Treasuries & TIPS
        • High Yield Corporates
        • Int'l Fixed Income
    • ETF Ecosystem
    • ETFs in Canada
    • Market Outlook
    • Crypto ETF Hub
  • Tools
    • ETF Screener
    • ETF Country Exposure Tool
    • ETF Database Categories
    • Indexes
    • Scenario Analysis
    • Watchlists
    • Head-To-Head ETF Comparison Tool
    • Mutual Fund To ETF Converter
    • ETF Stock Exposure Tool
    • ETF Issuer Fund Flows
  • Research
    • ETF Education
    • Equity Investing
    • Dividend ETFs
    • Leveraged ETFs
    • Inverse ETFs
    • Index Education
    • Index Insights
    • Top ETF Sectors
    • Top ETF Issuers
    • Top ETF Industries
  • Webcasts
  • Sectors
    • Sector Investing Content Hub
    • XLK
    • XLI
    • XLU
    • XLY
    • XLP
    • XLRE
    • Sector Power Rankings
    • XLE
    • XLC
    • XLF
    • XLV
    • XLB
  • Multimedia
    • ETF 360 Video Series
    • ETF of the Week Podcast
    • Gaining Perspective Podcast
    • ETF Prime Podcast
    • Video
  • Company
    • About VettaFi
  • PRO
    • Pro Content
    • Pro Tools
    • Advanced
    • FAQ
    • Free sign up
    • Login
  1. Fixed Income Content Hub
  2. New SPIVA Report Shows Active ETFs Struggle to Outperform
Fixed Income Content Hub
Share

New SPIVA Report Shows Active ETFs Struggle to Outperform

Nick WodeshickMar 04, 2026
2026-03-04

Time and again, reports highlight increasing enthusiasm from the greater investor community towards actively managed strategies, whether it be for the potential for defensive flexibility or hopes of long-term outperformance. However, is the data necessarily backing up the active enthusiasm? Recently, S&P Global released its 2025 SPIVA U.S. scorecard. This report has a longstanding precedent for its use as a barometer in the ongoing active vs. passive management debate. 

Unfortunately for the active management bulls, the latest SPIVA scorecard has offered less-than-enthusiastic results for active funds. To start, the report found that 79% of all actively managed large-cap U.S. equity funds ended up underperforming the S&P 500. 

Making matters worse, this weak performance marks a stark climb from last year’s numbers. In 2024, the amount of large-cap funds underperforming compared to the S&P 500 was about 14% lower. 

When considering that actively managed funds often charge higher fees than the kind of fund that passively tracks the S&P, this performance gap is only made more troubling. Investors are paying higher fees for funds that, on average, may end up offering weaker performance than a more basic indexed approach. 

A More Challenging Environment For Stock Picking

The question is, why is this happening?  Why are active managers struggling to pull ahead of the classic indexed approach? According to the report, outperforming large-caps made it more difficult for active stock pickers to find diamonds in the rough to snag for their portfolios. 

To be fair, it’s important to remember that 21% of active large-cap U.S. equity funds did, in fact, outperform the S&P 500. This report should serve as a reminder to do due diligence to make sure an active strategy is the right fit. If not, a passive, indexed strategy could be better. 

When in doubt, a classic, low-cost indexed approach tied to the S&P 500 may offer a fair path forward through today’s uncertain economy. Recently, many investors have chosen to allocate to the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO A), likely due to some of the aforementioned reasons. As of March 2, 2026, the fund has seen over $17 billion in net flows over the past month. 

Based on its track record, these net flows are likely quite justified. As of February 28, 2026, the fund’s NAV has risen 16.95% over the last 12 months.

For more news, information, and analysis, visit the Fixed Income Content Hub.


Content continues below advertisement

Loading Articles...

Advertisement

Is Your Portfolio Positioned With Enough Global Exposure?

ETF Education Channel

How to Allocate Commodities in Portfolios

Tom LydonApr 26, 2022
2022-04-26

A long-running debate in asset allocation circles is how much of a portfolio an investor should...

Core Strategies Channel

Why ETFs Experience Limit Up/Down Protections

Karrie GordonMay 13, 2022
2022-05-13

In a digital age where information moves in milliseconds and millions of participants can transact...

}
X