It’s another election year and, as expected, the issue of infrastructure is already being discussed. That could be to the benefit of ETFs, such as the FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund (NFRA ).
NFRA tries to reflect the performance of the STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index, which identifies equities that derive the majority of revenue from infrastructure business, providing exposure to not only infrastructure sectors, but non-traditional ones as well.
“House Democratic leaders unveiled the outlines for a $760 billion, five-year infrastructure package on Wednesday — a proposal that includes an ambitious climate agenda but not, so far, many specifics about how to find the money,” reports Politico.
NFRA’s index focuses on long-lived assets in industries with very high barriers to entry, with at least 50% of their revenue from key sectors with a 3-month average daily trending volume of at least $1 million. The portfolio is weighted based on a free-float market cap with certain constraints to limit exposure in any one security, sub-sector, or country. Additionally, the fund is rebalanced annually.
Good Timing For NFRA
Moreover, the state-level opportunity set for NFRA could be long-ranging and last several years, if not longer, particularly as larger states enter the infrastructure spending fray. Additionally, big dollars are required for infrastructure projects.
“In raw dollars spent, the Democrats’ package rivals the $1.5 trillion, 10-year infrastructure plan that President Donald Trump put out with great fanfare two years ago. But Trump’s would have relied mainly on state, local and private dollars — a controversial element even among many Republicans — and focused heavily on reducing the amount of time it takes to approve permits for projects,” according to Politico.
Investors who want to access global infrastructure investments through a liquid vehicle may consider NFRA as an alternative to being forced into long lock-up periods and high initial investments associated with direct infrastructure exposure.
“Paying for any massive infrastructure initiative is always a tricky issue, especially considering that the simplest option — a hike to the gasoline tax, which hasn’t been raised since 1993 — has been a political non-starter for most lawmakers in both parties,” notes Politico. “But it’s already clear what won’t work, House Transportation Chairman Peter DeFazio said — simply continuing the seven-decadelong tradition of viewing infrastructure mainly as the construction of highways, paid for with an eroding tax on gasoline.”
This article originally appeared on ETFTrends.com.
