ETFdb Logo
  • ETF Database
  • Content Hubs
    • Themes
      • Active ETF
      • Alternatives
      • Artificial Intelligence
      • China Insights
      • Core Strategies
      • Crypto
      • Disruptive Technology
      • Energy Infrastructure
      • ETF Building Blocks
      • ETF Investing
      • ETF Strategist
      • Financial Literacy
      • Fixed Income
      • Free Cash Flow
      • Future ETFs
      • Innovative ETFs
      • Institutional Income Strategies
      • Leveraged & Inverse
      • Market Insights
      • Market Outlooks
      • Modern Alpha
      • Nuclear Energy
      • Portfolio Strategies
      • Sector Investing
      • Tax Efficient Income
      • Thematic Investing
    • Asset Class
      • Equity
        • U.S. Equity
        • Int'l Developed
        • Emerging Market Equities
      • Alternatives
        • Gold/Silver/Critical Materials
        • Cryptocurrency
        • Currency
        • Volatility
      • Fixed Income
        • Investment Grade Corporates
        • US Treasuries & TIPS
        • High Yield Corporates
        • Int'l Fixed Income
    • ETF Ecosystem
    • ETFs in Canada
    • Market Outlook
    • Crypto ETF Hub
  • Tools
    • ETF Screener
    • ETF Country Exposure Tool
    • ETF Database Categories
    • Indexes
    • Scenario Analysis
    • Watchlists
    • Head-To-Head ETF Comparison Tool
    • Mutual Fund To ETF Converter
    • ETF Stock Exposure Tool
    • ETF Issuer Fund Flows
  • Research
    • ETF Education
    • Equity Investing
    • Dividend ETFs
    • Leveraged ETFs
    • Inverse ETFs
    • Index Education
    • Index Insights
    • Top ETF Sectors
    • Top ETF Issuers
    • Top ETF Industries
  • Webcasts
  • Sectors
    • Sector Investing Content Hub
    • XLK
    • XLI
    • XLU
    • XLY
    • XLP
    • XLRE
    • Sector Power Rankings
    • XLE
    • XLC
    • XLF
    • XLV
    • XLB
  • Multimedia
    • ETF 360 Video Series
    • ETF of the Week Podcast
    • Gaining Perspective Podcast
    • ETF Prime Podcast
    • Video
  • Company
    • About VettaFi
    • Get VettaFi’ed
  • PRO
    • Pro Content
    • Pro Tools
    • Advanced
    • FAQ
    • Free sign up
    • Login
  1. Portfolio Strategies Content Hub
  2. RSPT: Right Idea for More Balanced Approach to Tech
Portfolio Strategies Content Hub
Share

RSPT: Right Idea for More Balanced Approach to Tech

Tom LydonJul 13, 2023
2023-07-13

In the first half of 2023, the cap-weighted version of the S&P 500 Information Technology Index beat the S&P 500 by 26% — one of the widest margins on record for a six-month stretch. As advisors and investors know, that outperformance was driven in large part by a small cohort of mega-cap stocks. As a result, some broad indexes now feature significant weights to a small number of tech and communications services stocks.

Translation: Concentration risk is a growing concern in the indexing community.

To that point, NASDAQ recently announced a special rebalance of the cap-weighted version of the NASDAQ-100 Index (NDX) to reduce the dominance of Microsoft (MSFT), Apple (AAPL), and friends. Fortunately for investors looking for a more diverse approach to this high-flying sector, the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT A-) stands at the ready.

RSPT Standing on Its Own Merit

Enthusiasm for cap-weighted tech exchange traded funds is palpable and understandable. However, it’s worth noting that RSPT is no shrinking violet. The Invesco ETF is higher by 22.52% year-to-date. That’s impressive when considering that none of its 66 holdings exceed a weight of 1.69%.

Compare that with the cap-weighted version of the S&P 500 Information Technology Index, where Apple alone commands of 23% of that gauge. That’s one example of concentration risk in the tech sector. The Herfindahl-Hirschman Index indicates that those concerns are warranted.

“"Tech’s current adjusted HHI level of 9.6":https://www.spglobal.com/spdji/en/documents/performance-reports/dashboard-us-sector.pdf is in the 99th percentile of observations, indicating an extreme level of concentration for the sector compared to the long-term average of 4.9,” according to S&P Dow Jones Indices. “When concentration has been relatively high in the past, it has subsequently tended to decline.”

Typically, one way for concentration risk on cap-weighted ETFs to correct is for market values to decline. That’s not guaranteed to happen with tech over the near term. If anything, it’s a risky bet to make. However, that ominous scenario highlights the advantages of RSPT’s diversification benefits.

Something else to ponder regarding RSPT: While history doesn’t always repeat, it often rhymes. That’s potentially good news because RSPT has history on its side.

“The tendency of Tech concentration to reverse has important implications for the performance of equal-weight sector strategies,” added S&P Dow Jones. “Typically, after peaks in concentration (such as during 1990, 1999 and 2002), equal-weighted Tech has outperformed.”

For more news, information, and analysis, visit our Portfolio Strategies Channel.


Content continues below advertisement

Loading Articles...

Advertisement

Is Your Portfolio Positioned With Enough Global Exposure?

ETF Education Channel

How to Allocate Commodities in Portfolios

Tom LydonApr 26, 2022
2022-04-26

A long-running debate in asset allocation circles is how much of a portfolio an investor should...

Core Strategies Channel

Why ETFs Experience Limit Up/Down Protections

Karrie GordonMay 13, 2022
2022-05-13

In a digital age where information moves in milliseconds and millions of participants can transact...

}
X