ETFdb Logo
  • ETF Database
  • Content Hubs
    • Themes
      • Active ETF
      • Alternatives
      • Artificial Intelligence
      • China Insights
      • Core Strategies
      • Crypto
      • Disruptive Technology
      • Energy Infrastructure
      • ETF Building Blocks
      • ETF Investing
      • ETF Strategist
      • Financial Literacy
      • Fixed Income
      • Free Cash Flow
      • Future ETFs
      • Innovative ETFs
      • Institutional Income Strategies
      • Leveraged & Inverse
      • Market Insights
      • Market Outlooks
      • Modern Alpha
      • Nuclear Energy
      • Portfolio Strategies
      • Sector Investing
      • Tax Efficient Income
      • Thematic Investing
    • Asset Class
      • Equity
        • U.S. Equity
        • Int'l Developed
        • Emerging Market Equities
      • Alternatives
        • Gold/Silver/Critical Materials
        • Cryptocurrency
        • Currency
        • Volatility
      • Fixed Income
        • Investment Grade Corporates
        • US Treasuries & TIPS
        • High Yield Corporates
        • Int'l Fixed Income
    • ETF Ecosystem
    • ETFs in Canada
    • Crypto ETF Hub
  • Tools
    • ETF Screener
    • ETF Country Exposure Tool
    • ETF Database Categories
    • Indexes
    • Scenario Analysis
    • Watchlists
    • Head-To-Head ETF Comparison Tool
    • Mutual Fund To ETF Converter
    • ETF Stock Exposure Tool
    • ETF Issuer Fund Flows
  • Research
    • ETF Education
    • Equity Investing
    • Dividend ETFs
    • Leveraged ETFs
    • Inverse ETFs
    • Index Education
    • Index Insights
    • Top ETF Sectors
    • Top ETF Issuers
    • Top ETF Industries
  • Webcasts
  • Sectors
    • Sector Investing Content Hub
    • XLK
    • XLI
    • XLU
    • XLY
    • XLP
    • XLRE
    • Sector Power Rankings
    • XLE
    • XLC
    • XLF
    • XLV
    • XLB
  • Multimedia
    • ETF 360 Video Series
    • ETF of the Week Podcast
    • Gaining Perspective Podcast
    • ETF Prime Podcast
    • Video
  • Company
    • About VettaFi
  • PRO
    • Pro Content
    • Pro Tools
    • Advanced
    • FAQ
    • Free sign up
    • Login
  1. Beyond Basic Beta Content Hub
  2. Don’t Expect Much From This Healthcare ETF
Beyond Basic Beta Content Hub
Share

Don’t Expect Much From This Healthcare ETF

Tom LydonOct 16, 2019
2019-10-16

Down about 3% this year, the iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF (IHF A-) is a laggard among healthcare ETFs and that’s saying something because the sector is one of the worst performers in the S&P 500.

IHF is a traditional index fund that targets U.S. equities in the healthcare providers sector. Specifically, the ETF provides exposure to U.S. companies from health insurance, diagnostics, and specialized treatment.

IHF has been dogged this year by speculation that Medicare For All could become a reality if Democrats win the White House in 2020. Many of the most visible Democratic contenders for that party’s 2020 presidential nomination are embracing Medicare For All.

In other words, politics are plaguing IHF and its holdings, namely Dow component *UnitedHealth (UNH), a stock that accounts for 22.69% of IHF’s weight.

Surprising Highs

Early Thursday, IHF was trading surprising higher after an analyst downgraded UnitedHealth. What makes that upside in the ETF all the more surprising is that the analyst cut ratings on several of the ETF’s other components, too.

“Jefferies analyst David Windley is dampening any expectations for a turnaround. In a note out Thursday morning, Windley downgraded managed-care giant UnitedHealth Group to Hold from Buy, and cut-price targets for six other stocks, including Anthem (ANTM), Cigna (CI), and Humana (HUM),” reports Josh Nathan-Kazis for Barron’s.

Here’s the problem for IHF: UnitedHealth, Anthem, Cigna and Humana combine for over 40% of the fund’s roster.

Previously, investors embraced healthcare stocks for the sector’s growth and defensive characteristics, providing investors with yields and valuations that are less stretched than other yield-producing stocks like utilities. However, the managed care group is betraying that defensive reputation as investors sell IHF components amid intensifying political conjecture and concerns that hospital costs are rising, a scenario that also pressures managed care firms.

Related: Drug Pricing Reforms Keep Pressure on Biotech, Healthcare ETFs

When it comes to the 2020 presidential election, there are several moving parts regarding IHF’s fate.

“Windley said the political overhang on the stocks could lift at three possible moments over the next two years,” according to Barron’s. “He recommended buying managed-care stocks if Joe Biden wins the Democratic nomination in July 2020, and to wait if he doesn’t. If President Trump wins the November 2020 presidential election, Windley says to buy the managed-care stocks, but to wait if he loses. And if Warren is inaugurated in January 2021, buy managed-care stocks at the end of 2021 if she goes after the industry early in her term, otherwise, wait.”

This article originally appeared on ETFTrends.com


Content continues below advertisement

Loading Articles...

Advertisement

Is Your Portfolio Positioned With Enough Global Exposure?

ETF Education Channel

How to Allocate Commodities in Portfolios

Tom LydonApr 26, 2022
2022-04-26

A long-running debate in asset allocation circles is how much of a portfolio an investor should...

Core Strategies Channel

Why ETFs Experience Limit Up/Down Protections

Karrie GordonMay 13, 2022
2022-05-13

In a digital age where information moves in milliseconds and millions of participants can transact...

}
X