ETFdb Logo
  • ETF Database
  • Content Hubs
    • Themes
      • Active ETF
      • Alternatives
      • Artificial Intelligence
      • China Insights
      • Core Strategies
      • Crypto
      • Disruptive Technology
      • Energy Infrastructure
      • ETF Building Blocks
      • ETF Investing
      • ETF Strategist
      • Financial Literacy
      • Fixed Income
      • Free Cash Flow
      • Future ETFs
      • Innovative ETFs
      • Institutional Income Strategies
      • Leveraged & Inverse
      • Market Insights
      • Market Outlooks
      • Modern Alpha
      • Nuclear Energy
      • Portfolio Strategies
      • Sector Investing
      • Tax Efficient Income
      • Thematic Investing
    • Asset Class
      • Equity
        • U.S. Equity
        • Int'l Developed
        • Emerging Market Equities
        • Smart Beta
      • Alternatives
        • Gold/Silver/Critical Materials
        • Commodities
        • Cryptocurrency
        • Currency
        • Volatility
      • Fixed Income
        • Investment Grade Corporates
        • US Treasuries & TIPS
        • High Yield Corporates
        • Int'l Fixed Income
    • ETF Ecosystem
    • ETFs in Canada
    • Crypto ETF Hub
  • Tools
    • ETF Screener
    • ETF Country Exposure Tool
    • ETF Database Categories
    • Indexes
    • Scenario Analysis
    • Watchlists
    • Head-To-Head ETF Comparison Tool
    • Mutual Fund To ETF Converter
    • ETF Stock Exposure Tool
    • ETF Issuer Fund Flows
  • Research
    • ETF Education
    • Equity Investing
    • Dividend ETFs
    • Leveraged ETFs
    • Inverse ETFs
    • Index Education
    • Index Insights
    • Top ETF Sectors
    • Top ETF Issuers
    • Top ETF Industries
  • Webcasts
  • Sectors
    • Sector Investing Content Hub
    • XLK
    • XLI
    • XLU
    • XLY
    • XLP
    • XLRE
    • Sector Power Rankings
    • XLE
    • XLC
    • XLF
    • XLV
    • XLB
  • Multimedia
    • ETF 360 Video Series
    • ETF of the Week Podcast
    • Gaining Perspective Podcast
    • ETF Prime Podcast
    • Video
  • Company
    • About VettaFi
  • PRO
    • Pro Content
    • Pro Tools
    • Advanced
    • FAQ
    • Free sign up
    • Login
  1. Beyond Basic Beta Content Hub
  2. Politics May Again Pinch This Healthcare ETF
Beyond Basic Beta Content Hub
Share

Politics May Again Pinch This Healthcare ETF

Tom LydonFeb 10, 2020
2020-02-10

The iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF (IHF A-) appeared to be off to a fine start to 2020. Then came last week’s market tumble. While broader markets were punished by coronavirus headlines, IHF suffered a different brand of punishment.

With the Iowa Democratic caucus scheduled for Monday and Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, a supporter of Medicare For All surging in the polls, markets are becoming concerned about the near-term outlook for managed care providers, the companies residing in IHF.

IHF is a traditional index fund that targets U.S. equities in the healthcare providers sector. Specifically, the ETF provides exposure to U.S. companies from health insurance, diagnostics, and specialized treatment.

“Among US equity sectors, Health Care stocks have traded most closely with the 2020 Democratic primary race so far,” Barron’s reports, citing Goldman Sachs. “The sector also shows the highest volatility risk premium and implied volatility ‘bump’ around Super Tuesday,” referring to March 3, when a host of states hold nominating contests.”

Interesting Times For IHF

A recent Wall Street Journal article indicates the Trump Administration is planning to reveal a plan that would allow states to revert “Medicaid funding to a fixed federal block-grant model. The plan, long supported by Republicans, has faced Democratic opposition, and seemed dead,” according to Barron’s.

That is seen as making IHF components, such as UnitedHealth (UNH), CVS (CVS) and Centene (CNC) vulnerable. Those stocks combine for over 41% of IHF’s roster. Bottom line: President Trump and Republicans are looking for some kind of healthcare victory because it’s an issue the party has struggled with for some time.

Conversely, Medicare For All is seen as a drag on IHF components, something markets have confirmed on multiple occasions.

Related: Targeted ETFs to Hone in on Innovative Growth Ideas for 2020

IHF has been dogged this year by speculation that Medicare For All could become a reality if Democrats win the White House in 2020. Many of the most visible Democratic contenders for that party’s 2020 presidential nomination are embracing Medicare For All. The fund lost more than 4% last week.

“While passing the so-called single-payer health-care plan that the senator favors would require a huge and highly uncertain legislative battle, a Sanders win, or strong performance in early states would be a clear indication that the Democratic Party is shifting to the left on health-care policy generally,” according to Barron’s.

This article originally appeared on ETFTrends.com.


Content continues below advertisement

Loading Articles...

Advertisement

Is Your Portfolio Positioned With Enough Global Exposure?

ETF Education Channel

How to Allocate Commodities in Portfolios

Tom LydonApr 26, 2022
2022-04-26

A long-running debate in asset allocation circles is how much of a portfolio an investor should...

Core Strategies Channel

Why ETFs Experience Limit Up/Down Protections

Karrie GordonMay 13, 2022
2022-05-13

In a digital age where information moves in milliseconds and millions of participants can transact...

}
X