ETFdb Logo
  • ETF Database
  • Content Hubs
    • Themes
      • Active ETF
      • Alternatives
      • Artificial Intelligence
      • China Insights
      • Core Strategies
      • Crypto
      • Disruptive Technology
      • Energy Infrastructure
      • ETF Building Blocks
      • ETF Investing
      • ETF Strategist
      • Financial Literacy
      • Fixed Income
      • Free Cash Flow
      • Future ETFs
      • Innovative ETFs
      • Institutional Income Strategies
      • Leveraged & Inverse
      • Market Insights
      • Market Outlooks
      • Modern Alpha
      • Nuclear Energy
      • Portfolio Strategies
      • Sector Investing
      • Tax Efficient Income
      • Thematic Investing
    • Asset Class
      • Equity
        • U.S. Equity
        • Int'l Developed
        • Emerging Market Equities
      • Alternatives
        • Gold/Silver/Critical Materials
        • Cryptocurrency
        • Currency
        • Volatility
      • Fixed Income
        • Investment Grade Corporates
        • US Treasuries & TIPS
        • High Yield Corporates
        • Int'l Fixed Income
    • ETF Ecosystem
    • ETFs in Canada
    • Crypto ETF Hub
  • Tools
    • ETF Screener
    • ETF Country Exposure Tool
    • ETF Database Categories
    • Indexes
    • Scenario Analysis
    • Watchlists
    • Head-To-Head ETF Comparison Tool
    • Mutual Fund To ETF Converter
    • ETF Stock Exposure Tool
    • ETF Issuer Fund Flows
  • Research
    • ETF Education
    • Equity Investing
    • Dividend ETFs
    • Leveraged ETFs
    • Inverse ETFs
    • Index Education
    • Index Insights
    • Top ETF Sectors
    • Top ETF Issuers
    • Top ETF Industries
  • Webcasts
  • Sectors
    • Sector Investing Content Hub
    • XLK
    • XLI
    • XLU
    • XLY
    • XLP
    • XLRE
    • Sector Power Rankings
    • XLE
    • XLC
    • XLF
    • XLV
    • XLB
  • Multimedia
    • ETF 360 Video Series
    • ETF of the Week Podcast
    • Gaining Perspective Podcast
    • ETF Prime Podcast
    • Video
  • Company
    • About VettaFi
  • PRO
    • Pro Content
    • Pro Tools
    • Advanced
    • FAQ
    • Free sign up
    • Login
  1. Thematic Investing Content Hub
  2. Where Fundamental Analysis Meets the Chartists: The Launch of Defiance’s RANK ETF
Thematic Investing Content Hub
Share

Where Fundamental Analysis Meets the Chartists: The Launch of Defiance’s RANK ETF

Todd RosenbluthJul 13, 2026
2026-07-13

In my former career as a stock research analyst, a unique dynamic always signaled a high-conviction idea. While I sat there building out earnings models and reworking valuation assumptions, the technical analysts would look for relative strength or weakness. The chartists would regularly poke holes in my fundamental analysis recommendations. However, occasionally, my research would independently flag an undervalued stock that the technical analysis supported as a breakout. The recently launched Defiance KSM TipRanks Analyst ETF (RANK) brings these two investment approaches together nicely. The new index ETF can act as a bridge that blends fundamental research and momentum investing.

Key Takeaways

  • The newly launched RANK ETF blends fundamental analysis and technical trends in one TipRanks index approach.
  • Risk management constraints keep individual stock weights capped at 6% and Walmart (WMT) was a recent top position.
  • RANK’s underlying TipRanks index outpaced standalone strategies over a trailing three-year stretch, achieving a 37% annualized return as of June 2026.

The Factor Disconnect: Standalone Models vs. a Blended ETF Approach

To understand how RANK fits into the index-based ETF universe, let’s look at some popular ETFs. The VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT B) is a $12 billion fund built on fundamental analysis. It relies on a Morningstar research view to find structurally advantaged companies trading at deep value discounts. However, deep value can easily shift into a value trap if the market refuses to reward the stock.

Conversely, the $27 billion iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM A-) functions on pure technical analysis. It scores stocks based on backward-looking six- and 12-month price momentum, without a care about the company’s fundamentals. This leaves investors highly vulnerable to sudden sentiment reversals if the fundamentals weaken.

RANK handles this by demanding confirmation from both sides of the analyst community. Crucially, RANK is not dependent on just one research firm, which could be wrong on a stock. The TipRanks methodology aggregates independent consensus data across the entire Wall Street analyst community. 

The index starts with the largest U.S. corporations, where analysts broadly agree on strong fundamental buy ratings. Then, the index approach filters them through a technical trend overlay to ensure that momentum can drive the stock higher.


Content continues below advertisement

ETF Portfolio Under the Hood: Diversification and Index Constraints

The final composition of the index comprises 50 leading U.S. equities that have received validation from professional analyst consensus and actual market forces. The index operates under predetermined risk management constraints to protect investors. 

Individual stock weights are capped at 6%, and sector exposure is limited to a maximum of 40% at each quarterly rebalancing date. This rebalancing ensures that the best ideas still look compelling heading into earnings season.

Like MTUM, RANK has high exposure to information technology stocks such as Applied Materials, Lam Research, and Micron Technology. However, reflecting its fundamental focus, the ETF’s largest single position is allocated to Walmart. Meanwhile, stocks like Eli Lilly (LLY) and GE Aerospace (GE) bring the healthcare and industrial exposure more common in MOAT.

Analyzing the TipRanks Index’s 3-Year Track Record

Because RANK is a new ETF, evaluating its methodology requires reviewing the track record of its underlying benchmark. The TipRanks US Momentum Analysts Index has a strong hypothetical track record using a backtest shown below. The index behind RANK outperformed MTUM by over 200 basis points and MOAT by 2,500.

(Advisors can use this performance breakdown to evaluate how blending fundamental data with momentum signals has historical advantages over standalone strategies)

Strategy / Index Base3-Year Annualized Total Return (Ended June 2026)Primary Analytical Input Focus
TipRanks US Momentum Analysts Index36.70%Blended (Street Consensus + Price Trend Line)
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM)34.60%Pure Technical (6M/12M Backward Price Performance)
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT)10.50%Pure Fundamental (Morningstar Intrinsic Fair Value)
Past performance is not an indication of future results.

The ETF Intersection of Valuation and Velocity

For years, many people have struggled to find common ground between fundamental and technical analysis. However, with the new RANK ETF, there can be consensus. The ETF brings together two approaches in a complementary manner just as earnings season kicks off.

For more news, information, and analysis, visit the Thematic Investing Content Hub.

vettafi.com is owned by VettaFi LLC (“VettaFi”). VettaFi is the index provider for the RANK, for which it receives an index licensing fee. However, RANK is not issued, sponsored, endorsed, or sold by VettaFi. VettaFi and its affiliates have no obligation or liability in connection with the issuance, administration, marketing, or trading of RANK.

Loading Articles...

Advertisement

Is Your Portfolio Positioned With Enough Global Exposure?

ETF Education Channel

How to Allocate Commodities in Portfolios

Tom LydonApr 26, 2022
2022-04-26

A long-running debate in asset allocation circles is how much of a portfolio an investor should...

Core Strategies Channel

Why ETFs Experience Limit Up/Down Protections

Karrie GordonMay 13, 2022
2022-05-13

In a digital age where information moves in milliseconds and millions of participants can transact...

}
X