ETFdb Logo
ETFdb Logo
  • ETF Database
  • Channels
    • Active ETF
    • Alternatives
    • Beyond Basic Beta
    • China Insights
    • Climate Insights
    • Commodities
    • Core Strategies
    • Crypto
    • Disruptive Technology
    • Dividend
    • Dual Impact
    • Emerging Markets
    • Energy Infrastructure
    • ESG
    • ETF Building Blocks
    • ETF Education
    • ETF Strategist
    • Fixed Income
    • Free Cash Flow
    • Future ETFs
    • Global Diversification
    • Gold/Silver/Critical Minerals
    • Innovative ETFs
    • Institutional Income Strategies
    • Leveraged & Inverse
    • Managed Futures
    • Market Insights
    • Megatrends
    • Modern Alpha
    • Multi-Asset
    • Night Effect
    • Portfolio Strategies
    • Retirement Income
    • Richard Bernstein Advisors
    • Tax Efficient Income
    • Thematic Investing
    • Volatility Resource
  • Tools
    • ETF Screener
    • ETF Country Exposure Tool
    • ETF Sector Tracker Tool
    • ETF Database Categories
    • Head-To-Head ETF Comparison Tool
    • ETF Stock Exposure Tool
    • ETF Issuer Fund Flows
    • Indexes
    • Mutual Fund To ETF Converter
    • ETF Data for Journalists
    • ETF Nerds
  • Research
    • First Bitcoin ETF
    • ETF Education
    • Equity Investing
    • Dividend ETFs
    • Leveraged ETFs
    • Inverse ETFs
    • Index Education
    • Index Insights
    • Top ETF Sectors
    • Top ETF Issuers
    • Top ETF Industries
  • Webcasts
  • Themes
    • AI ETFs
    • Blockchain ETFs
    • See all Thematic Investing ETF themes
    • ESG Investing
    • Marijuana ETFs
  • Multimedia
    • ETF 360 Video Series
    • ETF Trends on Videos
    • ETF Trends on Podcasts
    • ETF Prime Podcast
  • Company
    • About Us
    • Swag Store
  • PRO
    • Pro Content
    • Pro Tools
    • Advanced
    • FAQ
    • Pricing
    • Free Sign Up
    • Login
  1. ETF Investing
  2. ETF Biases: What’s Really Driving Your ETF Portfolio?
ETF Investing
Share

ETF Biases: What’s Really Driving Your ETF Portfolio?

Daniela Pylypczak-WasylyszynApr 24, 2015
2015-04-24

Over the years, investors have come to embrace the exchange-traded fund structure, as these securities provide low-cost access to nearly every corner of the investable universe.

One of the many key features of ETFs is that they provide significant diversification benefits; prior to the days of ETFs, investors had to rely on either expensive money managers or their own stock cherry-picking methodologies. Though exchange-traded funds give investors cheaper and more efficient means of portfolio diversification, a closer look under the hood of some of these products reveal several noteworthy biases. Below, we highlight what investors should be looking for to find out what really is driving their ETF

What is a Single Stock Bias?

In the case of ETFs that have a relatively small number of holdings, investors should always look to see how much is allocated to the top security. Sometimes, a single stock makes up roughly a quarter of the fund’s total portfolio, meaning the performance of the ETF is heavily dependent on a single security. While this is not necessarily a bad thing, investors should be comfortable with the risk/return profile of such a top-heavy ETF.

Below are two examples of ETFs that have heavy allocations to a single stock. Please note that returns data is based on monthly adjusted prices from December 2012 to January 2014:


Content continues below advertisement

This chart features the performance of the Biotechnology ETF (BBH B-) versus its top holding Giliead Sciences (GILD). The fund allocates more than 14% to the stock (as of 4/22/2015). In this example, BBH benefited from a heavy allocation towards GILD, gaining nearly 80%.

Unlike the BBH example, this chart depicts how a single stock can actually negatively affect bottom line returns. The MSCI Global Silver Miners ETF (SLVP B+) allocates roughly 24% to Silver Wheaton Corporation (SLW), and as seen above, the performance of the stock and ETF essentially mimic each other.

What is a Multi-Stock Bias?

While single-stock biases are sometimes easier to spot, investors should also be on the look out for those “broad-based” funds that feature a significant bias towards a handful of companies. Often, when investors see that an ETF has a relatively large amount of individual holdings, they assume that there is a reasonable amount of diversification. A closer look, however, reveals that 2-5 individual securities make up a significant portion of the fund’s total assets.

Here is an example of an ETF that features a heavy bias towards three stocks:

The Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP A) holds roughly 40 individual holdings (almost double the holdings of BBH). The top three holdings—Procter & Gamble (PG), Coca-Cola (KO), and Philip Morris (PM)—together account for more than one-third of XLP’s total assets. The chart shows how these three securities weighed heavily on XLP, with the ETF gaining only 23%. Though a 23% gain is by no means insignificant, comparing the fund to an equal-weighted ETF paints a slightly different picture:

Here we see the performance of XLP compared to the equally weighted Consumer Staples ETF (RHS B). Over the same period, the equally-weighted fund managed to outperform XLP by roughly 8%. Investors should note that this example does not mean alternative weighting methodologies always outperform traditional market-cap weighted ETFs, but that they do sometimes help mitigate the risk associated with single or multi-stock biases.

What is a Sector Bias?

As is the case seen in multi-stock biases, sometimes “broad-based” funds are heavily skewed towards a particular industry or sub-sector of the market. Take for example the China Large Cap ETF (FXI A), which is designed to measure the performance of the largest companies in the China equity market. Though the fund does offer exposure to a wide array of sectors, it invests more than half of its assets in financial services. Tech stocks, however, are given an allocation of less than 10%.

Throughout 2013, Chinese equities struggled to stay out of the red, but as the chart above shows, one particular corner of that market managed to deliver stellar returns – Chinese tech firms. Because FXI has a relatively small allocation to the sector, it, along with Chinese financials (CHIX B), lost almost 10%, while the China Technology Fund (QQQC B) gained over 60% during the same time frame.

What are Region and Country Biases?

For those investors looking to add exposure to foreign equities, ETFs are by far the most efficient means to tap into markets overseas. Investors have a variety of options when it comes to foreign exposure, including global, region-specific, and single-country ETFs. A closer look at some of the geographically “broader” ETFs sometimes reveals significant biases towards a particular country or region.

The EAFE Index ETF (EFA A) is designed to measure the performance of equity markets in European, Australasian, and Far Eastern markets. Its portfolio, however, allocates more than half of its total assets towards European equities. Looking at the chart above, the performance of EFA and the Europe ETF (VGK A) very closely mimic each other. An even closer look under the hood of EFA also reveals that Japanese equities account for roughly 20% of total assets, but because European stocks dominate the portfolio, EFA is not able to capture all of the stellar returns from Japanese equities.

The Bottom Line

Though ETFs certainly do offer key diversification benefits to investors, it is important to take a closer look under the hood of these products. ETF biases can occur in a number of ways, including heavy allocations to a particular stock, sector, country, or region. Depending on an investor’s risk/return profile, these biases are not necessarily bad, but the realization that a particular bias can essentially drive an ETF is crucial.

» Popular Pages

  • Tickers
  • Articles

Feb 03

Main Management Market Note: February 3, 2023

Feb 03

SPYI, a High-Income ETF Within Equities, Up 10%

Feb 03

Navigating Exchange FOMO for Advisors

Feb 03

In 2022, Main Supply of EU Electricity Was Renewable

Feb 03

VettaFi’s ETF Rising Stars: January 2023

Feb 03

Big Tech Is No Longer Certain; Consider Active

Feb 03

Equal-Weight Cloud Computing ETF WCLD Hits Buy Signal

Feb 03

American Century's KORP, VALQ Hit 5-Year Mark

Feb 03

Bitcoin Opens 2023 Strong, Outperforms Bonds

Feb 03

These 2 ETFs Show Growth Is Back in Style

QQQ

Invesco QQQ Trust

SPY

SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust

VOO

Vanguard S&P 500 ETF

VGT

Vanguard Information...

SMH

VanEck Semiconductor ETF

XLK

Technology Select Sector SPDR...

VTI

Vanguard Total Stock Market...

SOXX

iShares Semiconductor ETF

BLOK

Amplify Transformational Data...

META

Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF

Loading Articles...
Help & Info
  • Contact Us
Tools
  • ETF Screener
  • ETF Analyzer
  • Mutual Fund to ETF Converter
  • Head-To-Head ETF Comparison
  • ETF Country Exposure Tool
  • ETF Stock Exposure Tool
  • ETF Performance Visualizer
  • ETF Database Model Portfolios
  • ETF Database Realtime Ratings
  • ETF Database Pro
More Tools
  • ETF Launch Center
  • Financial Advisor & RIA Center
  • ETF Database RSS Feed
Explore ETFs
  • ETF News
  • ETF Picks of the Month
  • ETF Category Reports
  • Premium Articles
  • Alphabetical Listing of ETFs
  • Best ETFs
  • Browse ETFs by ETF Database Category
  • Browse ETFs by Index
  • Browse ETFs by Issuer
  • Compare ETFs
Legal
  • Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
  • © 2023 VettaFi LLC. All rights reserved.
Follow ETF Database
Follow ETF Database

Advertisement

Is Your Portfolio Positioned With Enough Global Exposure?

ETF Education Channel

How to Allocate Commodities in Portfolios

Tom LydonApr 26, 2022
2022-04-26

A long-running debate in asset allocation circles is how much of a portfolio an investor should...

Core Strategies Channel

Why ETFs Experience Limit Up/Down Protections

Karrie GordonMay 13, 2022
2022-05-13

In a digital age where information moves in milliseconds and millions of participants can transact...

}
X