ETFdb Logo
ETFdb Logo
ETFdb Logo
ETFdb Logo
  • Channels
    • Active ETF
    • Alternatives
    • Beyond Basic Beta
    • China Insights
    • Climate Insights
    • Commodities
    • Core Strategies
    • Crypto
    • Disruptive Technology
    • Dividend
    • Dual Impact
    • Emerging Markets
    • Energy Infrastructure
    • Entrepreneur ETF
    • Equity ETF
    • ESG
    • ETF Building Blocks
    • ETF Education
    • ETF Strategist
    • Fixed Income
    • Future ETFs
    • Gold & Silver Investing
    • Innovative ETFs
    • Institutional Income Strategies
    • Leveraged & Inverse
    • Managed Futures
    • Modern Alpha
    • Multi-Asset
    • Multi-Factor
    • Nasdaq Investment Intelligence
    • Portfolio Strategies
    • Retirement Income
    • Smart Beta
    • Thematic Investing
    • Volatility Resource
  • Database
  • Tools
    • ETF Screener
    • ETF Country Exposure Tool
    • ETF Sector Tracker Tool
    • ETF Database Categories
    • Head-To-Head ETF Comparison Tool
    • ETF Stock Exposure Tool
    • ETF Issuer Fund Flows
    • Indexes
    • Mutual Fund To ETF Converter
    • ETF Data for Journalists
    • ETF Nerds
  • Research
    • First Bitcoin ETF
    • ETF Education
    • Equity Investing
    • Dividend ETFs
    • Leveraged ETFs
    • Inverse ETFs
    • Top ETF Sectors
    • Top ETF Issuers
    • Top ETF Industries
  • Webcasts
    • ETFs Future-Forward 2021: An iShares Investing Symposium
    • Three Themes for 2021: An iShares & MSCI Investing Symposium
  • Themes
    • AI ETFs
    • Blockchain ETFs
    • See all Thematic Investing ETF themes
    • ESG Investing
    • Marijuana ETFs
  • Videos & Podcasts
    • ETF 360 Video Series
    • ETF Trends on Videos
    • ETF Trends on Podcasts
    • ETF Prime Podcast
  • PRO
    • Pro Content
    • Pro Tools
    • Advanced
    • FAQ
    • Pricing
    • Free Sign Up
    • Login
  1. Why “Pure Style” ETFs Matter: Examining Growth (RPG) and Value (RPV)
News
Share

Why "Pure Style" ETFs Matter: Examining Growth (RPG) and Value (RPV)

Stoyan BojinovFeb 24, 2015
2015-02-24

Innovation in the ETF industry over the years has spawned dozens upon dozens of products that deliver access to corners of the investment universe that were simply out-of-reach to the masses just a few year earlier. While the roster of niche and hyper-targeted products continues to grow, it’s worth moving the spotlight back onto funds that are considered more of the “building block” type; that is to say, there’s plenty of index-based ETFs that deliver exposure to core asset classes and popular investment styles that are worth re-examining.

We recently had the opportunity to talk with Jim R. King, Portfolio Manager of the Guggenheim Pure Style ETFs, about how his firm’s unique products based on S&P’s methodology have resulted in persistent outperformance among investment growth and value-focused equity fund peers over the years.

ETF Database: As a veteran in the ETF industry, what are your thoughts on how the industry has evolved in the last few years? Going forward, what do you see as the potential growth areas for ETFs?


Content continues below advertisement

man pointing to rising graph

Jim King (JK): The ETF industry has enjoyed consistently robust growth in recent years. Investors have grown more comfortable with allocating more of their investment portfolios to ETFs, and new investors are learning about the benefits of ETFs as they transition out of other alternative investment vehicles or single security strategies. Innovation in the ETF industry has fueled a significant portion of that growth.

As the set of available investment solutions has diversified away from what was primarily an equity-only marketplace, more investor types, including retail and institutional investors, are increasing their allocations to ETFs.

Future growth in the industry will be sourced in part by increasing adoption in the 401(k) marketplace, and the expansion of available active strategies in ETF form in certain asset classes.

Be sure to also read about What We Learned at the Inside ETFs Conference 2015.

ETF Database: The Pure Style lineup of ETFs from Guggenheim has an impressive track record versus the S&P 500® dating all the way back to the lineup’s inception in early 2006. Please elaborate on the success of the S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG) and the S&P 500 Pure Value ETF (RPV).

JK: Pure Style’s unique investment methodology has resulted in compelling returns over time. It’s important to note that just because one Pure Style is outperforming, doesn’t mean the other is underperforming the broader market. In fact, both RPG and RPV have outperformed the S&P 500® and their respective S&P 500® Growth and S&P 500® Value Indexes for the trailing 3- and 5-year periods and since the inception of the Pure Style Indices on March 1, 2006

See returns comparison table below; please note all returns are as of 1/31/2015 (source: Morningstar).

ETF/IndexCumulative Return since Pure Style inception of 3/1/2006Cumulative Return since market low of 3/10/20093Y Average annual Total Return5Y Average annual Total Return
S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG)128.10%325.07%20.25%20.21%
S&P 500 Pure Value ETF (RPV)73.46%477.70%22.18%18.61%
S&P 50055.78%194.89%17.47%15.60%
S&P 500 Growth81.52%202.09%17.95%16.69%
S&P 500 Value32.21%187.45%16.48%14.08%

This is not possible with the traditional style benchmarks, as traditional growth and value indices are additive to the parent index, in this case the S&P 500®. Historically, as one traditional style index – growth or value – outperforms the parent index, the other traditional style index tends to underperform by the same amount.

ETF Database: Describe what separates the Pure Style methodology from other growth and value-focused products.

JK: The Pure Style methodology seeks to include only those stocks with the strongest growth or value style attributes and excludes the ambiguous ones. It also weights index members based on their style attractiveness, not by market cap.

For example, the “growthiest” stocks in the growth benchmark get the most weight, as opposed to more traditional methods which simply default to cap-weighting. Assigning weights based on style attractiveness places emphasis on the very attributes that style investors are looking for, and allows for greater differentiation of performance.

Be sure to read more on The Truth About Alternative Weighting Methodologies.

ETF Database: What are some of the most overlooked pitfalls associated with traditional growth and value-focused equity ETFs? How does the Pure Style approach remedy these pitfalls?

JK: Traditional style approaches seek to include all members of the parent index – the S&P 500® in this specific example – in either the value or growth benchmark.

See image below for a visual representation of what comprises the traditional growth and value benchmarks:

traditional growth and value indexes

In many cases, stocks with ambiguous style profiles end up in both indices, leading to high degrees of overlap and less opportunity for differentiation between value and growth. Cap-weighting waters down the style profile and further tethers the style indices to the parent index and to each other.

Although sports analogies can be overdone, we like to think that Pure Style indices choose their growth and value players more carefully, and make sure that the best players on each ‘team’ get the most playing time.

ETF Database: Are the Pure Style ETFs meant to be utilized as more of a core or tactical holding?

JK: We see the Pure Style ETFs serving both needs. Given historical outperformance over market cycles, Pure Styles can effectively serve as a core holding in the large-cap portion of investors’ portfolios.

Conversely, some of the strongest performance periods have been delivered when either growth or value has been in favor, so tilting a portfolio to overweight a style based on your investment outlook is a viable approach to tactical management.

The Bottom Line

The impressive track record of outperformance among Guggenheim’s Pure Style ETFs serves as a testament to the notion that investors must absolutely take a close look under the hood before making an allocation; the lesson here is that even across seemingly-identical offerings, in this case growth and value-focused ETFs, there can be noteworthy differences that will impact your bottom line returns in unforeseen ways if you’re unaware of these nuances. For growth and value-minded investors specifically, RPG and RPV respectively warrant a closer look given their stellar returns over time.

Follow me on Twitter @Sbojinov

[For more ETF analysis, make sure to sign up for our free ETF newsletter]

Disclosure: No positions at time of writing.

» Popular Pages

  • Tickers
  • Articles

May 17

Uranium Investing Has Legs

May 17

Why Managed Futures Are the Crisis Alpha Creators

May 17

Exchange Reflections with Dave Nadig

May 17

Invest in Infrastructure With This One ETF

May 17

MICUS: Bitcoin Is “Best Store of Value Earth Has Seen”

May 17

Simplify Helps Asset Allocation with FIG Launch

May 17

Teucrium Launches Diversified Agro ETF With TILL

May 17

Convertible Bond Drubbing May be Worth it With This ETF

May 17

Tech Bargains Means Now's a Good Time to Mind QQQ's

May 17

Tech Pain Helped This Leveraged ETF Go Up 150% YTD

QQQ

Invesco QQQ Trust

SPY

SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust

VOO

Vanguard S&P 500 ETF

ARKK

ARK Innovation ETF

VYM

Vanguard High Dividend Yield...

WEAT

Teucrium Wheat Fund

VTI

Vanguard Total Stock Market...

VGT

Vanguard Information...

XLE

Energy Select Sector SPDR...

VIG

Vanguard Dividend...


Content continues below advertisement

Loading Articles...
Help & Info
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Mission Statement
  • Press
Tools
  • ETF Screener
  • ETF Analyzer
  • Mutual Fund to ETF Converter
  • Head-To-Head ETF Comparison
  • ETF Country Exposure Tool
  • ETF Stock Exposure Tool
  • ETF Performance Visualizer
  • ETF Database Model Portfolios
  • ETF Database Realtime Ratings
  • ETF Database Pro
More Tools
  • ETF Launch Center
  • Financial Advisor & RIA Center
  • ETF Database RSS Feed
Explore ETFs
  • ETF News
  • ETF Picks of the Month
  • ETF Category Reports
  • Premium Articles
  • Alphabetical Listing of ETFs
  • Best ETFs
  • Browse ETFs by ETF Database Category
  • Browse ETFs by Index
  • Browse ETFs by Issuer
  • Compare ETFs
Legal
  • Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
  • © ETF Flows LLC
Follow ETF Database
Follow ETF Database

Advertisement

Is Your Portfolio Positioned With Enough Global Exposure?

Equity ETF Channel

Retirement Portfolio Redux: Is the 60%-40% Portfolio Dead?

Debbie CarlsonOct 22, 2020
2020-10-22

With the 10-year U.S. Treasury yield hovering below 1% and Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell...

Equity ETF Channel

Portfolio Diversification Isn't Dead, It Was Just Sleeping

Debbie CarlsonOct 15, 2020
2020-10-15

Investors could be forgiven to think there was no reason to invest outside of the U.S. for the...

}
X