ETFdb Logo
  • ETF Database
  • Content Hubs
    • Themes
      • Active ETF
      • Alternatives
      • Artificial Intelligence
      • China Insights
      • Core Strategies
      • Crypto
      • Disruptive Technology
      • Energy Infrastructure
      • ETF Building Blocks
      • ETF Investing
      • ETF Strategist
      • Financial Literacy
      • Fixed Income
      • Free Cash Flow
      • Future ETFs
      • Innovative ETFs
      • Institutional Income Strategies
      • Leveraged & Inverse
      • Market Insights
      • Market Outlooks
      • Modern Alpha
      • Nuclear Energy
      • Portfolio Strategies
      • Sector Investing
      • Tax Efficient Income
      • Thematic Investing
    • Asset Class
      • Equity
        • U.S. Equity
        • Int'l Developed
        • Emerging Market Equities
      • Alternatives
        • Gold/Silver/Critical Materials
        • Cryptocurrency
        • Currency
        • Volatility
      • Fixed Income
        • Investment Grade Corporates
        • US Treasuries & TIPS
        • High Yield Corporates
        • Int'l Fixed Income
    • ETF Ecosystem
    • ETFs in Canada
    • Market Outlook
    • Crypto ETF Hub
  • Tools
    • ETF Screener
    • ETF Country Exposure Tool
    • ETF Database Categories
    • Indexes
    • Scenario Analysis
    • Watchlists
    • Head-To-Head ETF Comparison Tool
    • Mutual Fund To ETF Converter
    • ETF Stock Exposure Tool
    • ETF Issuer Fund Flows
  • Research
    • ETF Education
    • Equity Investing
    • Dividend ETFs
    • Leveraged ETFs
    • Inverse ETFs
    • Index Education
    • Index Insights
    • Top ETF Sectors
    • Top ETF Issuers
    • Top ETF Industries
  • Webcasts
  • Sectors
    • Sector Investing Content Hub
    • XLK
    • XLI
    • XLU
    • XLY
    • XLP
    • XLRE
    • Sector Power Rankings
    • XLE
    • XLC
    • XLF
    • XLV
    • XLB
  • Multimedia
    • ETF 360 Video Series
    • ETF of the Week Podcast
    • Gaining Perspective Podcast
    • ETF Prime Podcast
    • Video
  • Company
    • About VettaFi
    • Get VettaFi’ed
  • PRO
    • Pro Content
    • Pro Tools
    • Advanced
    • FAQ
    • Free sign up
    • Login
  1. Relative Value Investing Content Hub
  2. Occidental/Anadarko Bid: No Support for Oil & Gas ETFs
Relative Value Investing Content Hub
Share

Occidental/Anadarko Bid: No Support for Oil & Gas ETFs

Brenton GarenApr 25, 2019
2019-04-25

Occidental Petroleum Corp. (OXY) upped the ante on Anadarko Petroleum Corp. (APC), triggering a potential bidding war for a key shale driller in the Permian Basin after the Chevron Corp. (CVX) offer, but it wasn’t enough to lift oil and gas exploration sector-related exchange traded funds.

On Wednesday, the VanEck Vectors Unconventional Oil & Gas ETF (FRAK B-) fell 0.7%, iShares U.S. Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (IEO B+) dropped 0.9% and Invesco Dynamic Energy Exploration & Production Portfolio (PXE B) declined 1.1%.

Occidental Petroleum offered to buyout Anadarko Petroleum for $38 billion, out bidding Chevron’s previous agreed purchase price of $33 billion, the Wall Street Journal reports.

Anadarko shares surged 12.0% on the revelation. APC makes up 6.6% of FRAK’s underlying portfolio, 5.2% of PXE and 4.6% of IEO.

According to a letter Occidental Chief Executive Vicki Hollub sent to Anadarko’s board, the company has been making offers to Anadarko since late March, with two price tags that were higher than what the shale driller agreed to with Chevron.

“We were surprised and disappointed that your board did not engage with us on that proposal,” Hollub wrote in the letter.

Occidental put a cash-and-stock deal on the table that targeted $76 per share, or $11 per share more than the value Chevron announced.

Anadarko holds assets from Texas to Mozambique, and Occidental sees the deal as a way to expand its footprint in the booming Permian basin where it is already one of the largest operators.

Earlier in April, Chevron stated it would acquire Anadarko in a cash-and-stock deal valued at $33 billion.

Anadarko agreed to pay at $1 billion breakup fee with Chevron if that deal doesn’t go through.

“It is unfortunate that Anadarko agreed to pay a break up fee of $1 billion, representing approximately $2 per share, without even picking up the phone to speak to us after we made two proposals during the week of April 8 that were at a significantly higher value to the transaction you were apparently negotiating with Chevron,” Hollub said in her letter.

For investors looking for continued upside in U.S. cyclical sectors over defensive sectors, the Direxion MSCI Cyclicals Over Defensives ETF (RWCD C+) offers them the ability to benefit not only from cyclical sectors potentially performing well, but from their outperformance compared to defensive sectors.

Conversely, if investors believe that U.S. defensive sectors will outperform cyclical sectors, the Direxion MSCI Defensives Over Cyclicals ETF (RWDC B) provides a means to not only see defensive sectors perform well, but a way to capitalize on their outperformance compared to cyclical sectors.

For more news and strategy on the Oil ETF market, visit our Oil category.

Loading Articles...

Advertisement

Is Your Portfolio Positioned With Enough Global Exposure?

ETF Education Channel

How to Allocate Commodities in Portfolios

Tom LydonApr 26, 2022
2022-04-26

A long-running debate in asset allocation circles is how much of a portfolio an investor should...

Core Strategies Channel

Why ETFs Experience Limit Up/Down Protections

Karrie GordonMay 13, 2022
2022-05-13

In a digital age where information moves in milliseconds and millions of participants can transact...

}
X