ETFdb Logo
ETFdb Logo
  • ETF Database
  • Channels
    • Active ETF
    • Alternatives
    • Beyond Basic Beta
    • China Insights
    • Climate Insights
    • Commodities
    • Core Strategies
    • Crypto
    • Disruptive Technology
    • Dividend
    • Dual Impact
    • Emerging Markets
    • Energy Infrastructure
    • ESG
    • ETF Building Blocks
    • ETF Education
    • ETF Strategist
    • Fixed Income
    • Free Cash Flow
    • Future ETFs
    • Global Diversification
    • Gold & Silver Investing
    • Innovative ETFs
    • Institutional Income Strategies
    • Leveraged & Inverse
    • Managed Futures
    • Market Insights
    • Megatrends
    • Modern Alpha
    • Multi-Asset
    • Night Effect
    • Portfolio Strategies
    • Retirement Income
    • Richard Bernstein Advisors
    • Tax Efficient Income
    • Thematic Investing
    • Volatility Resource
  • Tools
    • ETF Screener
    • ETF Country Exposure Tool
    • ETF Sector Tracker Tool
    • ETF Database Categories
    • Head-To-Head ETF Comparison Tool
    • ETF Stock Exposure Tool
    • ETF Issuer Fund Flows
    • Indexes
    • Mutual Fund To ETF Converter
    • ETF Data for Journalists
    • ETF Nerds
  • Research
    • First Bitcoin ETF
    • ETF Education
    • Equity Investing
    • Dividend ETFs
    • Leveraged ETFs
    • Inverse ETFs
    • Index Education
    • Index Insights
    • Top ETF Sectors
    • Top ETF Issuers
    • Top ETF Industries
  • Webcasts
  • Themes
    • AI ETFs
    • Blockchain ETFs
    • See all Thematic Investing ETF themes
    • ESG Investing
    • Marijuana ETFs
  • Multimedia
    • ETF 360 Video Series
    • ETF Trends on Videos
    • ETF Trends on Podcasts
    • ETF Prime Podcast
  • Company
    • About Us
    • Swag Store
  • PRO
    • Pro Content
    • Pro Tools
    • Advanced
    • FAQ
    • Pricing
    • Free Sign Up
    • Login
  1. Index Insights
  2. Williams Does Not Quack Like a Duck
Index Insights
Share

Williams Does Not Quack Like a Duck

Maria HalmoMay 19, 2015
2015-05-19

My mother and I look just like each other. So much so that if you hold up pictures of us when she was seven and I was seven, my father can’t tell us apart. It was true for us at 27, too. And I can only hope that it will still be true when I am 47. But the fact remains, as much as we look like twins born 32 years apart, we are not actually twins. Likewise, my brother is two years younger than I am, but when we were children and he wore his hair long and I had mine short, we were asked if we were twins. The resemblance must be strong, but if you knew us a little better, you’d know that Mike and I are as different as honey and butter.

Similarly, when Williams announced on the morning of its analyst day (slides available here and here) that The Williams Companies (WMB) would be buying Williams Partners (WPZ), the media immediately began commenting on the resemblance between this deal and the one completed by Kinder Morgan (KMI) in November 2014. The comparison to KMI’s purchase of its daughter companies last year is really the closest comp out there. This is only the second time we’ve seen a C Corporation general partner buy its limited partner MLP after all. (Alerian’s original thoughts on the Kinder transaction are available here.)

This is the image alt text


Content continues below advertisement

This is the image alt text

Kinder may be the best comp, but the transaction is different and the effect on tax bills will be different.

One reason KMI has seen an uplift since the transaction is that MLPs are not eligible for inclusion in the S&P 500. Previous to the deal, KMI had a market cap of $40 billion, when the $44 billion deal was completed, that more than doubled. Suddenly all the SPX-linked assets needed to increase their KMI holdings significantly. WMB is a $36 billion company and also a current member of the S&P 500, but it already owns so much of WPZ that this $13.8 billion deal won’t increase WMB’s S&P 500 weight on the same scale as the Kinder deal, even on a relative basis.

[Note: Due to insider and cross ownership, the math is a little more complicated than KMI more than doubling in size and WMB increasing by a third.

Previous to the Kinder deal, so many KMI shares were owned by directors and executive officers that only 64% of the company was considered public float. (This is according to Alerian’s calculations. S&P may have a slightly different number.) This meant that on a float-adjusted basis, KMI was only a $26 billion company. After the Kinder roll-up, 83% of the company became public, giving it a $70 billion float-adjusted market cap. On a float-adjusted basis, KMI increased by 170%.

For Williams, 88% of the $36 billion company is already public, giving it a $32 billion float-adjusted market cap. Using some back-of-a-napkin math, and foregoing any share price fluctuation, after the deal, WMB will have a float-adjusted market cap of $45 billion, an increase of only around 25%.]

Even looking back, the impetus for the transactions may have been different. Before the Kinder deal, cash flows at both KMP and EPB were steady, but the total cost of capital for the enterprise steadily rose as KMP continued to grow despite reaching the 50% splits in 1997. Also, I’m sure, Rich Kinder was frustrated with KMP trading more or less sideways for the three years preceding the roll-up. For Williams, WPZ (formerly ACMP) had been in the high splits since the end of 2013, which is not nearly so long. Yes, WPZ was dealing with an IDR burden, but with the added complication of a higher beta to oil with the commodity price environment not expected to improve. In February, management reaffirmed WPZ guidance, but they also expected it to be near the low end of the range. The midpoint of the range (based on $55 WTI) meant coverage would be an even 1.0×.

I know we’re an indexing company so everyone assumes we’re all about theoretical constructions, frictionless transactions, and spherical cows. However, just because our theoretical indices don’t pay theoretical distributions (although they have a yield), that doesn’t mean we’re unaware of taxes. Certainly, many KMP and EPB unitholders had a huge unexpected taxable event when they received KMI units. For the Williams transaction, given the merger just last year, even legacy WPZ unitholders from the 2005 IPO wouldn’t have a painfully low cost basis to recapture. At least, not compared to those who owned KMP from its 1992 IPO.

Going forward, WPZ investors will have to decide if they want to stick with the business model they knew before but with a new C Corporation structure (and attendant 1099 tax forms and little if any return of capital). Investors interested in the long-term energy infrastructure build-out of North America, with both WMB and KMI, have another way to access the space. If this method of lowering cost of capital proves popular, more will follow. Previously, GP/LP pairs were grilled about IDR give-backs, IDRs in exchange for units, or the LP buying the GP. Now there will be one more question for investors to ask at the ONEOK Inc (OKE) shareholder meeting today.

It’s easy to get caught up in comparisons, but investors must remember that no two transactions are exactly the same. Despite how it looks, the result of the WMB/WPZ merger will not be a mirror image of the KMI roll-up. As with many things, looks can be deceiving.


» Popular Pages

  • Tickers
  • Articles

Jan 27

Main Management Market Note: January 27, 2023

Jan 27

As Recession Signals Grow, Turn to Risk-Managed ETFs

Jan 27

HGER Acts as a Compelling Solution for Inflation

Jan 27

Mutual Fund-to-ETF Conversions: The Future in 4 Charts

Jan 27

American Century ETF Duo Hits Key Buy Signals Friday

Jan 27

ACES and AMLP Aid Investing in the Energy Transition

Jan 27

Target Long Duration, High Quality Fixed Income

Jan 27

The Sharpe-r Way to Invest

Jan 27

Structure Matters: Volatility May Make 60/40 Unclear

Jan 27

IRBA Demonstrates a Profits-Driven ESG ETF

QQQ

Invesco QQQ Trust

SPY

SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust

VOO

Vanguard S&P 500 ETF

VGT

Vanguard Information...

SMH

VanEck Semiconductor ETF

XLK

Technology Select Sector SPDR...

VTI

Vanguard Total Stock Market...

SOXX

iShares Semiconductor ETF

BLOK

Amplify Transformational Data...

META

Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF

Loading Articles...
Help & Info
  • Contact Us
Tools
  • ETF Screener
  • ETF Analyzer
  • Mutual Fund to ETF Converter
  • Head-To-Head ETF Comparison
  • ETF Country Exposure Tool
  • ETF Stock Exposure Tool
  • ETF Performance Visualizer
  • ETF Database Model Portfolios
  • ETF Database Realtime Ratings
  • ETF Database Pro
More Tools
  • ETF Launch Center
  • Financial Advisor & RIA Center
  • ETF Database RSS Feed
Explore ETFs
  • ETF News
  • ETF Picks of the Month
  • ETF Category Reports
  • Premium Articles
  • Alphabetical Listing of ETFs
  • Best ETFs
  • Browse ETFs by ETF Database Category
  • Browse ETFs by Index
  • Browse ETFs by Issuer
  • Compare ETFs
Legal
  • Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
  • © 2023 VettaFi LLC. All rights reserved.
Follow ETF Database
Follow ETF Database

Advertisement

Is Your Portfolio Positioned With Enough Global Exposure?

ETF Education Channel

How to Allocate Commodities in Portfolios

Tom LydonApr 26, 2022
2022-04-26

A long-running debate in asset allocation circles is how much of a portfolio an investor should...

Core Strategies Channel

Why ETFs Experience Limit Up/Down Protections

Karrie GordonMay 13, 2022
2022-05-13

In a digital age where information moves in milliseconds and millions of participants can transact...

}
X