ETFdb Logo
  • ETF Database
  • Content Hubs
    • Themes
      • Active ETF
      • Alternatives
      • Artificial Intelligence
      • China Insights
      • Core Strategies
      • Crypto
      • Disruptive Technology
      • Energy Infrastructure
      • ETF Building Blocks
      • ETF Investing
      • ETF Strategist
      • Financial Literacy
      • Fixed Income
      • Free Cash Flow
      • Future ETFs
      • Innovative ETFs
      • Institutional Income Strategies
      • Leveraged & Inverse
      • Market Insights
      • Market Outlooks
      • Modern Alpha
      • Nuclear Energy
      • Portfolio Strategies
      • Sector Investing
      • Tax Efficient Income
      • Thematic Investing
    • Asset Class
      • Equity
        • U.S. Equity
        • Int'l Developed
        • Emerging Market Equities
      • Alternatives
        • Gold/Silver/Critical Materials
        • Cryptocurrency
        • Currency
        • Volatility
      • Fixed Income
        • Investment Grade Corporates
        • US Treasuries & TIPS
        • High Yield Corporates
        • Int'l Fixed Income
    • ETF Ecosystem
    • ETFs in Canada
    • Market Outlook
    • Crypto ETF Hub
  • Tools
    • ETF Screener
    • ETF Country Exposure Tool
    • ETF Database Categories
    • Indexes
    • Scenario Analysis
    • Watchlists
    • Head-To-Head ETF Comparison Tool
    • Mutual Fund To ETF Converter
    • ETF Stock Exposure Tool
    • ETF Issuer Fund Flows
  • Research
    • ETF Education
    • Equity Investing
    • Dividend ETFs
    • Leveraged ETFs
    • Inverse ETFs
    • Index Education
    • Index Insights
    • Top ETF Sectors
    • Top ETF Issuers
    • Top ETF Industries
  • Webcasts
  • Sectors
    • Sector Investing Content Hub
    • XLK
    • XLI
    • XLU
    • XLY
    • XLP
    • XLRE
    • Sector Power Rankings
    • XLE
    • XLC
    • XLF
    • XLV
    • XLB
  • Multimedia
    • ETF 360 Video Series
    • ETF of the Week Podcast
    • Gaining Perspective Podcast
    • ETF Prime Podcast
    • Video
  • Company
    • About VettaFi
    • Get VettaFi’ed
  • PRO
    • Pro Content
    • Pro Tools
    • Advanced
    • FAQ
    • Free sign up
    • Login
  1. Market Insights Content Hub
  2. Tailormade Tech With Baron Capital’s BCTK
Market Insights Content Hub
Share

Tailormade Tech With Baron Capital's BCTK

Ben HernandezMay 14, 2026
2026-05-14

For many investors, technology exposure is synonymous with passive funds like Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ B). However, as the sector evolves and concentration risk in the Nasdaq-100 reaches historic levels, a more precise approach can be beneficial. For investors looking for high-conviction portfolio with an eye on the long term, Baron Technology ETF (BCTK) is a compelling option. The ETF gives investors actively managed exposure that fundamentally differs from passive peers like QQQ.

See More: Peel Back the AI Onion With Baron Capital’s Active Approach to Tech

Raw Count vs. Effective Concentration

The main difference between BCTK and QQQ is apparent when looking at its holdings. The funds overlap only 39% (as of May 4), despite their shared focus on the tech sector.

On the surface, QQQ appears to be more diversified, with over 100 holdings. On the other end of the spectrum, BCTK has almost 40 holdings. This is less than half of QQQ’s total but, as mentioned, BCTK offers higher conviction thanks to an active selection strategy. Stocks are held for the long term after rigorous research. This results in a higher effective holdings ratio (0.58 versus QQQ’s 0.32) where each stock has more meaningful contribution to alpha.

Top-10 Concentration Gap

Content continues below advertisement

Top-10 Concentration Gap

In addition, BCTK’s weight in its top 10 holdings is further evidence of its active conviction versus QQQ’s index-driven construction. QQQ’s top-10 weight is 47%. In contrast, BCTK’s top-10 comprise 58% of the fund.

This is a byproduct of active selection compared to QQQ’s passive market cap-weighted approach. BCTK deliberately overweights names like NVIDIA and Alphabet, based on fundamental research and the belief that these companies will outpace the broader sector over the long term. QQQ, on the other hand, allocates to companies based on market cap.

“There has been a massive wave of capital flowing into the Magnificent Seven stocks, leading to significant concentration in equity markets,” said BCTK portfolio manager Michael Lippert in a Portfolio Managers Q&A. “While five of our top 10 holdings fall within this group, we size positions based on research-driven conviction, not market capitalization.”

QQQ provides broad exposure to the 100 largest tech-focused companies. Alternatively, BCTK provides a high-conviction, research-driven portfolio, precisely engineered with exposure to long-term growth.

For more news, information, and analysis, visit the Market Insights Content Hub.

Loading Articles...

Advertisement

Is Your Portfolio Positioned With Enough Global Exposure?

ETF Education Channel

How to Allocate Commodities in Portfolios

Tom LydonApr 26, 2022
2022-04-26

A long-running debate in asset allocation circles is how much of a portfolio an investor should...

Core Strategies Channel

Why ETFs Experience Limit Up/Down Protections

Karrie GordonMay 13, 2022
2022-05-13

In a digital age where information moves in milliseconds and millions of participants can transact...

}
X