ETFdb Logo
ETFdb Logo
  • ETF Database
  • Channels
    • Active ETF
    • Beyond Basic Beta
    • China Insights
    • Climate Insights
    • Commodities
    • Core Strategies
    • Crypto
    • Direct Indexing
    • Disruptive Technology
    • Energy Infrastructure
    • ETF Building Blocks
    • ETF Education
    • ETF Strategist
    • Financial Literacy
    • Fixed Income
    • Gold/Silver/Critical Minerals
    • Innovative ETFs
    • Institutional Income Strategies
    • Leveraged & Inverse
    • Managed Futures
    • Market Insights
    • Modern Alpha
    • Night Effect
    • Portfolio Strategies
    • Responsible Investing
    • Retirement Income
    • Richard Bernstein Advisors
    • Tax Efficient Income
    • Volatility Resource
  • Tools
    • ETF Screener
    • ETF Country Exposure Tool
    • ETF Sector Tracker Tool
    • ETF Database Categories
    • Head-To-Head ETF Comparison Tool
    • ETF Stock Exposure Tool
    • ETF Issuer Fund Flows
    • Indexes
    • Mutual Fund To ETF Converter
  • Research
    • ETF Education
    • Equity Investing
    • Dividend ETFs
    • Leveraged ETFs
    • Inverse ETFs
    • Index Education
    • Index Insights
    • Top ETF Sectors
    • Top ETF Issuers
    • Top ETF Industries
  • Webcasts
  • Themes
    • AI ETFs
    • Blockchain ETFs
    • See all Thematic Investing ETF themes
    • ESG Investing
    • Marijuana ETFs
  • Multimedia
    • ETF 360 Video Series
    • ETF of the Week Podcast
    • ETF Prime Podcast
    • Video
  • Company
    • About VettaFi
    • Get VettaFi’ed
  • PRO
    • Pro Content
    • Pro Tools
    • Advanced
    • FAQ
    • Pricing
    • Free Sign Up
    • Login
  1. Why Low-Volatility ETFs Might be a Risky Gamble
News
Share

Why Low-Volatility ETFs Might be a Risky Gamble

Justin KuepperSep 02, 2016
2016-09-02

Low-volatility exchange-traded funds (ETFs) have become extremely popular since the 2008-2009 global financial crisis. With Brexit and other market-moving events creating uncertainty, investors have poured billions of dollars into these smart-beta funds as a way to hedge against risk and still capture market upside. The problem is that these funds are starting to exhibit some warning signs that investors should carefully consider before assuming they’re a safe bet.

In this article, we’ll look at why low-volatility ETFs have become so popular, as well as why investors may want to exercise caution before using them.

Growing Popularity

Low-volatility ETFs have become extremely popular over the past few years, as investors seek safer returns. In fact, the PowerShares S&P 500 Low Volatility Portfolio ETF (SPLV A+) alone has seen nearly $1.4 billion in net inflows that have brought its market value up to $7.7 billion since the beginning of the year. The ETF has rewarded many of these investors with 10.2% returns compared to about 7.7% for the SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY A).

It’s easy to see why investors have flocked to low-volatility ETFs. According to Invesco, the S&P 500 Low Volatility Index captured only 43% of the S&P 500’s downside since 2011 and even managed to rise in one of the ten worst market downturns (see graph below). The iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol USA ETF (USMV A+) similarly notes that it has captured a full 83% of the S&P 500’s upside and just 44% of its downside since November of 2011.


Content continues below advertisement

low volatility etf performance - invesco

According to John Prestbo’s piece on MarketWatch, more than $50 billion has been added to low-volatility ETFs over the past five years or so since the 2008-2009 financial crisis. Six of these ETFs have attracted more than $2 billion in assets a piece, with the PowerShares S&P 500 Low Volatility Portfolio ETF (SPLV A+) commanding nearly 20% of the category’s assets and the iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol USA ETF (USMV A+) holding double that figure.

Potential Concerns

The significant capital inflows into low-volatility ETFs have led to concerns over the valuation of less volatile relative to more volatile equities. For instance, the iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol USA ETF (USMV A+) trades with an average P/E ratio of 24.84x and a P/B ratio of 3.37x compared to an average P/E ratio of 19.69x and P/B ratio of 2.77x for the SPDR S&P 500 (SPY A). These are significantly higher valuations that could jeopardize future performance.

Price-Earnings (P/E)Price-Book (P/B)
SPDR S&P 500 (SPY A)19.69x2.77x
iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol USA ETF (USMV A+)24.84x3.37x
Difference in Valuation0.2620.217

A second concern is that the strong performance of these ETFs has actually increased their volatility relative to the S&P 500. In fact, low-volatility ETFs have been about 25% more volatile than the market. While this volatility has been skewed towards the upside, the lack of control over volatility could just as easily spill to the downside. Mr. Prestbo points out that a reversion to the mean could disillusion low-vol investors.

Finally, it’s worth noting that the expense ratios associated with low-volatility ETFs are often higher than standard market index funds. These expenses can add up over time and require the funds to outperform benchmark indexes in order to match returns – a tall order for any fund. The S&P 500 SPDR ETF’s net expense ratio stands at just 0.0945% compared to low-volatility ETFs’ expense ratios of between 0.15% and 0.25%.

The Bottom Line

Low-volatility ETFs have become extremely popular since the 2008-2009 global financial crisis as a way to reduce risk and still capture upside. While their performance has been impressive to date, there are some warning signs that investors shouldn’t ignore, including lofty valuations and rising volatility. These funds also carry higher expense ratios, which means they will need to sustainably outperform cheaper index ETFs to deliver the best returns.

» Popular Pages

  • Tickers
  • Articles

May 31

Moving Averages: S&P Finishes the Month Up 0.25%

May 31

Sectors That Can Benefit Most From an Equal-Weight Strategy

May 31

Customize Holdings With Direct Indexing

May 31

Avoiding Speculation Doesn’t Make You a Bear

May 31

Debt Debate Diminishing, Earnings Are the Real Story

May 31

Panasonic Forecasts Record 2024 Net Profits, KARS Captures

May 31

VettaFi Viewpoints: Nadig & Mercer on AI's Disruptive Potential

May 31

As Debt Ceiling Fears Drag on Markets, BNDD Outperforms

May 31

High-Yield Prospects: May 30 Edition

May 31

How Investing in the Night Enhanced May Returns

QQQ

Invesco QQQ Trust

SPY

SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust

IYW

iShares U.S. Technology ETF

SMH

VanEck Semiconductor ETF

VGT

Vanguard Information...

BOTZ

Global X Robotics &...

VOO

Vanguard S&P 500 ETF

XLK

Technology Select Sector SPDR...

JEPI

JPMorgan Equity Premium...

VTI

Vanguard Total Stock Market...


Content continues below advertisement

Loading Articles...
Our Sites
  • VettaFi
  • Advisor Perspectives
  • ETF Trends
Tools
  • ETF Screener
  • Mutual Fund to ETF Converter
  • Head-To-Head ETF Comparison
  • ETF Country Exposure Tool
  • ETF Stock Exposure Tool
  • ETF Database Pro
More Tools
  • Financial Advisor & RIA Center
Explore ETFs
  • ETF News
  • ETF Category Reports
  • Premium Articles
  • Alphabetical Listing of ETFs
  • Browse ETFs by ETF Database Category
  • Browse ETFs by Index
  • Browse ETFs by Issuer
  • Compare ETFs
Information
  • Contact Us
  • Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
  • © 2023 VettaFi LLC. All rights reserved.

Advertisement

Is Your Portfolio Positioned With Enough Global Exposure?

ETF Education Channel

How to Allocate Commodities in Portfolios

Tom LydonApr 26, 2022
2022-04-26

A long-running debate in asset allocation circles is how much of a portfolio an investor should...

Core Strategies Channel

Why ETFs Experience Limit Up/Down Protections

Karrie GordonMay 13, 2022
2022-05-13

In a digital age where information moves in milliseconds and millions of participants can transact...

}
X