ETFdb Logo
  • ETF Database
  • Content Hubs
    • Themes
      • Active ETF
      • Alternatives
      • Artificial Intelligence
      • China Insights
      • Core Strategies
      • Crypto
      • Disruptive Technology
      • Energy Infrastructure
      • ETF Building Blocks
      • ETF Investing
      • ETF Strategist
      • Financial Literacy
      • Fixed Income
      • Free Cash Flow
      • Future ETFs
      • Innovative ETFs
      • Institutional Income Strategies
      • Leveraged & Inverse
      • Market Insights
      • Market Outlooks
      • Modern Alpha
      • Nuclear Energy
      • Portfolio Strategies
      • Sector Investing
      • Tax Efficient Income
      • Thematic Investing
    • Asset Class
      • Equity
        • U.S. Equity
        • Int'l Developed
        • Emerging Market Equities
      • Alternatives
        • Gold/Silver/Critical Materials
        • Cryptocurrency
        • Currency
        • Volatility
      • Fixed Income
        • Investment Grade Corporates
        • US Treasuries & TIPS
        • High Yield Corporates
        • Int'l Fixed Income
    • ETF Ecosystem
    • ETFs in Canada
    • Market Outlook
    • Crypto ETF Hub
  • Tools
    • ETF Screener
    • ETF Country Exposure Tool
    • ETF Database Categories
    • Indexes
    • Scenario Analysis
    • Watchlists
    • Head-To-Head ETF Comparison Tool
    • Mutual Fund To ETF Converter
    • ETF Stock Exposure Tool
    • ETF Issuer Fund Flows
  • Research
    • ETF Education
    • Equity Investing
    • Dividend ETFs
    • Leveraged ETFs
    • Inverse ETFs
    • Index Education
    • Index Insights
    • Top ETF Sectors
    • Top ETF Issuers
    • Top ETF Industries
  • Webcasts
  • Sectors
    • Sector Investing Content Hub
    • XLK
    • XLI
    • XLU
    • XLY
    • XLP
    • XLRE
    • Sector Power Rankings
    • XLE
    • XLC
    • XLF
    • XLV
    • XLB
  • Multimedia
    • ETF 360 Video Series
    • ETF of the Week Podcast
    • Gaining Perspective Podcast
    • ETF Prime Podcast
    • Video
  • Company
    • About VettaFi
  • PRO
    • Pro Content
    • Pro Tools
    • Advanced
    • FAQ
    • Free sign up
    • Login
  1. Index Insights
  2. Do You Have Historical MLP Classification Data?
Index Insights
Share

Do You Have Historical MLP Classification Data?

Karyl PatredisMar 20, 2016
2016-03-20

I read about Alerian’s new Energy MLP Classification Standard (EMCSSM). Do you have historical MLP classification data?

We do! And because we love you, we’ve analyzed it for you. We started by taking “snapshots” of the years 1996, 2002, 2006, 2012, and 2016. The outer orange circles represent the total market cap of the MLP space as of the end of each stated year. The orange rings are divided into pieces that show how much of the total market cap belonged to a certain sector at a given time. In the center of each circle is a solid blue dot that contains the number of MLPs at the end of each year (except for 2016, obvs, which is as of February 29).

We note that the EMCS categorizes MLPs by their primary business activity, so while many MLPs are diversified in their assets, you can only belong to one category.

2016.03.31 Pie Charts

I am a picture person, but for my table people, this may be easier to digest. It also includes the data for all years since 1996!


Content continues below advertisement

2016.03.31 Chart

The most obvious takeaway from this data is that the Pipeline Transportation sector has been the primary business in the MLP space for the past 20 years.

However, in the most recent decade, Gathering & Processing MLPs have given Pipeline Transportation MLPs a run for their money. Back in 1998, when there were a whopping 22 MLPs, there was only one G&P company, Enterprise Products Partners (EPD). The company comprised 9% of the total market capitalization. Thanks to the application of horizontal drilling in the Barnett in 2003 and the “shale mania” that followed, the demand for gathering and processing infrastructure (and subsequently, G&P MLPs) began to increase from 2004/2005 and thereafter. By 2006, there were 15 G&P MLPs, and as depicted, 31% of the total market capitalization. In fact, for one year (2014), G&P MLPs (41%) represented a higher percentage versus Pipeline Transportation MLPs (40%) of total energy MLP market capitalization.

On the flip side, the sector that has seen the largest decline in exposure is Marketing. In 1996, six of the 21 MLPs were engaged in propane distribution, representing 30% of total market capitalization. While we’ve seen “gas station MLPs” enter the MLP structure, declining propane demand and significant consolidation in the propane space has resulted in Marketing MLPs representing 4% of total market cap.

It’s important to note that within several of these categories there are also sub categories:

This is the image alt text

While looking at the pies, it’s clear that Production & Mining MLPs currently make up a relatively small percentage of the total market capitalization. However, at the peak of commodity prices (crude, gas, coal, etc.) in 2007, Production & Mining names reached their highest exposure at 10% (7% to Hydrocarbon and 3% to Coal). Upstream names (Alerian classifies upstream as Production & Mining | Hydrocarbon), which previously made up the bulk of the Production & Mining category, currently only make up 0.4% of total MLP market cap, for obv reasons.

Finally, the sheer number of categories has increased over time from 4 in 1996 to 13 today, as a function of tax lawyers trying to put more businesses into the MLP structure. Just kidding, but not really. With more than 100 PLRs issued in the past two decades, qualifying income continues to be interpreted (and expanded).

To learn which MLPs fit into which category, visit our screener here. To understand which business activities are carried out in each of the sectors, click here to download a helpful PDF. If you have further questions about historical classification data, please email me at [email protected].

 

Edited to reflect EPD’s classification change to Pipeline Transportation | Natural Gas by the end of 2015. Charts revised on 03.31.2016. 

 

» Popular Pages

  • Tickers
  • Articles

Jun 23

Active Tech ETF GTEK Delivers Smashing YTD Performance

Jun 23

Biotech ETFs Gain Momentum via AI Drug Discovery & Surging M&A

Jun 23

Bitcoin Miners Are Winning the AI Boom

Jun 23

Which Route During a Tech Rout? Two Low Volatility ETFs

Jun 23

Active ETFs Hit Record $2.49T in Assets Through May

Jun 23

Capture Midcap Momentum With XMMO's Surprising Sector Tilts

Jun 23

SpaceX Takes Center Stage in HALX June Rebalance

Jun 23

High Yield Continues to Drift Toward Higher Quality

Jun 23

National Bank Launches New NBI Thematic Rotation ETF

Jun 23

REIT ETFs: Real Estate's Quiet Revival

QQQ

Invesco QQQ Trust Series I

VOO

Vanguard S&P 500 ETF

GLD

SPDR Gold Shares

SMH

VanEck Semiconductor ETF

DRAM

Roundhill Memory ETF

SOXX

iShares Semiconductor ETF

PPLT

abrdn Physical Platinum...

SIVR

abrdn Physical Silver Shares...

SCHD

Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF...

SOXL

Direxion Daily Semiconductor...

Loading Articles...

Advertisement

Is Your Portfolio Positioned With Enough Global Exposure?

ETF Education Channel

How to Allocate Commodities in Portfolios

Tom LydonApr 26, 2022
2022-04-26

A long-running debate in asset allocation circles is how much of a portfolio an investor should...

Core Strategies Channel

Why ETFs Experience Limit Up/Down Protections

Karrie GordonMay 13, 2022
2022-05-13

In a digital age where information moves in milliseconds and millions of participants can transact...

}
X