ETFdb Logo
ETFdb Logo
  • ETF Database
  • Channels
    • Active ETF
    • Alternatives
    • Beyond Basic Beta
    • China Insights
    • Climate Insights
    • Commodities
    • Core Strategies
    • Crypto
    • Disruptive Technology
    • Dividend
    • Dual Impact
    • Emerging Markets
    • Energy Infrastructure
    • ESG
    • ETF Building Blocks
    • ETF Education
    • ETF Strategist
    • Fixed Income
    • Free Cash Flow
    • Future ETFs
    • Global Diversification
    • Gold/Silver/Critical Minerals
    • Innovative ETFs
    • Institutional Income Strategies
    • Leveraged & Inverse
    • Managed Futures
    • Market Insights
    • Megatrends
    • Modern Alpha
    • Multi-Asset
    • Night Effect
    • Portfolio Strategies
    • Retirement Income
    • Richard Bernstein Advisors
    • Tax Efficient Income
    • Thematic Investing
    • Volatility Resource
  • Tools
    • ETF Screener
    • ETF Country Exposure Tool
    • ETF Sector Tracker Tool
    • ETF Database Categories
    • Head-To-Head ETF Comparison Tool
    • ETF Stock Exposure Tool
    • ETF Issuer Fund Flows
    • Indexes
    • Mutual Fund To ETF Converter
    • ETF Data for Journalists
    • ETF Nerds
  • Research
    • First Bitcoin ETF
    • ETF Education
    • Equity Investing
    • Dividend ETFs
    • Leveraged ETFs
    • Inverse ETFs
    • Index Education
    • Index Insights
    • Top ETF Sectors
    • Top ETF Issuers
    • Top ETF Industries
  • Webcasts
  • Themes
    • AI ETFs
    • Blockchain ETFs
    • See all Thematic Investing ETF themes
    • ESG Investing
    • Marijuana ETFs
  • Multimedia
    • ETF 360 Video Series
    • ETF Trends on Videos
    • ETF Trends on Podcasts
    • ETF Prime Podcast
  • Company
    • About Us
    • Swag Store
  • PRO
    • Pro Content
    • Pro Tools
    • Advanced
    • FAQ
    • Pricing
    • Free Sign Up
    • Login
  1. Index Insights
  2. Midstream MLPs and Corps: Differences Beyond Tax Treatment
Index Insights
Share

Midstream MLPs and Corps: Differences Beyond Tax Treatment

Stacey Morris, CFAJul 25, 2022
2022-07-25

Summary

  • Generally, energy infrastructure corporations tend to be larger and have a higher credit quality than MLPs, while MLPs offer higher, tax-advantaged yield.
  • The Alerian MLP Index (AMZ) has greater exposure to companies focused on petroleum pipelines, while the Alerian Midstream Energy Corporation Index (AMCC) is biased towards natural gas pipelines.
  • Performance comparisons between AMZ and AMCC will vary based on how different macro drivers impact constituents, but structure alone is not typically a primary determinant of performance.

The North American energy infrastructure universe consists of Master Limited Partnerships (MLPs) and US and Canadian corporations, which transport, store, and process hydrocarbons. Business activities are similar, but tax treatment differs, with MLPs receiving special advantages as pass-through entities in the US. Beyond the obvious tax differences, how do midstream MLPs and C-Corps compare when it comes to performance, yields, credit quality, and other metrics? Today’s note compares energy infrastructure MLPs and corporations using the Alerian MLP Index (AMZ) and the Alerian Midstream Energy Corporation Index (AMCC).

Introducing AMCC – the midstream C-Corp benchmark.

As the number of midstream corporations increased and their share of the universe market capitalization grew over time, it was clear that an energy infrastructure C-Corp benchmark was needed. AMCC includes midstream companies based in the US and Canada that are taxed as corporations. At the end of June, AMCC was 36.2% Canadian corporations. AMCC’s methodology is similar to the AMZ in that constituents are weighted based on float-adjusted market capitalization and the largest constituents are capped at 10%. These similarities help facilitate comparisons between these two indexes as proxies for MLPs and corporations in aggregate. The AMCC Index began live calculation in December 2019.

AMZ vs. AMCC: Comparing MLPs and corporations with index data.

AMZ and AMCC index-level data is useful for making generalizations about MLPs and corporations as a group. (Investors weighing an investment in an individual MLP against an individual corporation should clearly perform a more focused comparison.) As shown in the table below, corporations are larger by market capitalization and have better credit profiles as evidenced by a higher investment-grade weighting for AMCC. MLPs tend to offer more generous income, with the yield on AMZ sitting 270 basis points above that of AMCC at the end of June. MLP income is not only higher but tends to be largely tax-deferred, which is a key benefit of the MLP structure (read more).

 

This is the image alt text


 


AMZ and AMCC also differ in their subsector exposure, with the MLP index providing greater exposure to companies focused on petroleum pipelines (43.8% of AMZ) and the C-Corp index biased towards natural gas pipelines (33.4% of AMCC). Both offer similar exposure to gathering & processing (G&P) companies at ~30% of the index by weighting. However, the G&P names in AMZ are smaller (i.e. market cap below $10 billion) and higher beta compared to some of the G&P corporations in AMCC, such as Williams (WMB), which had a market cap near $40 billion at the end of June and is a component of the S&P 500. Liquefaction accounts for 12.3% of AMCC, which is three times the weighting of liquefaction in AMZ. Cheniere Energy Partners (CQP) is the lone liquefaction name in AMZ.



Content continues below advertisement

Screen Shot 2022-07-26 at 12.19.56 PM


 


 


Performance differences are more about constituents and less about structure.


Over the years, there has been some debate around performance differences between MLPs and corporations. There was a view that corporations should outperform MLPs because of their simpler tax reporting (1099 instead of Schedule K-1) and their eligibility for broad market indexes, which benefit from flows into passive products (assuming inflows and not outflows). On the other hand, one could argue that MLPs should outperform because of their higher yield and tax advantages. In VettaFi’s view, performance differences between MLPs and corporations have more to do with the characteristics of the companies (business activity, asset geography, size, etc.) than corporate structure. An exception to this would be regulatory issues or tax changes specific to MLPs or corporations.


Since its launch in late December 2019, the AMCC Index has outperformed the AMZ Index on a total-return basis despite its lower yield as shown in the chart below. However, since both indexes hit relative highs on June 7, AMZ has outperformed AMCC by 90 basis points through July 20. Performance comparisons between AMZ and AMCC will vary based on how different macro drivers impact constituents. For example, at the end of June, Cheniere Energy (LNG) was the largest component of AMCC and up over 30% for 1H22 after gaining almost 70% in 2021, significantly outpacing gains for AMZ and AMCC in both periods. A portion of AMCC’s outperformance relative to AMZ could be ascribed to its greater exposure to strengthening global LNG markets through Cheniere. All this to say, a number of factors will explain the relative performance of AMZ and AMCC, but typically constituent structure is not a primary determinant.


Picture1-Jul-26-2022-05-21-25-89-PM


Bottom Line:


AMZ and AMCC allow for broad comparison of midstream MLPs and corporations beyond their different tax treatment.


AMZ is the underlying index for the JP Morgan Alerian MLP Index ETN (AMJ), the ETRACS Alerian MLP Index ETN Series B, and ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN. 


Related Materials:


AMZ Index Webpage


AMCC Index Webpage


AMZ Fact Sheet


AMCC Fact Sheet


MLP Taxation: The Benefits and What You Need to Know




This is the image alt text


» Popular Pages

  • Tickers
  • Articles

Feb 02

A Week of Turning Points

Feb 02

ExxonMobil Ends 2022 With Free Cash Flow

Feb 02

Fundamentals ETF IRBA Helps Avoid "Fool's Gold" Rallies

Feb 02

Quality International Dividends Can Tame Volatility

Feb 02

A Good Time for a Risk Check-up

Feb 02

Easing Energy Prices Warrant an Equal Weight Strategy

Feb 02

Americans Predict Volatility in 2023: Hedge With DBMF

Feb 02

Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF Launch From First Trust

Feb 02

Timothy Plan Launches “Biblically Responsible” ETF

Feb 02

Investors Are Soaking Up Emerging Markets Bonds in Early 2023

QQQ

Invesco QQQ Trust

SPY

SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust

VOO

Vanguard S&P 500 ETF

VGT

Vanguard Information...

SMH

VanEck Semiconductor ETF

XLK

Technology Select Sector SPDR...

VTI

Vanguard Total Stock Market...

SOXX

iShares Semiconductor ETF

BLOK

Amplify Transformational Data...

META

Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF

Loading Articles...
Help & Info
  • Contact Us
Tools
  • ETF Screener
  • ETF Analyzer
  • Mutual Fund to ETF Converter
  • Head-To-Head ETF Comparison
  • ETF Country Exposure Tool
  • ETF Stock Exposure Tool
  • ETF Performance Visualizer
  • ETF Database Model Portfolios
  • ETF Database Realtime Ratings
  • ETF Database Pro
More Tools
  • ETF Launch Center
  • Financial Advisor & RIA Center
  • ETF Database RSS Feed
Explore ETFs
  • ETF News
  • ETF Picks of the Month
  • ETF Category Reports
  • Premium Articles
  • Alphabetical Listing of ETFs
  • Best ETFs
  • Browse ETFs by ETF Database Category
  • Browse ETFs by Index
  • Browse ETFs by Issuer
  • Compare ETFs
Legal
  • Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
  • © 2023 VettaFi LLC. All rights reserved.
Follow ETF Database
Follow ETF Database

Advertisement

Is Your Portfolio Positioned With Enough Global Exposure?

ETF Education Channel

How to Allocate Commodities in Portfolios

Tom LydonApr 26, 2022
2022-04-26

A long-running debate in asset allocation circles is how much of a portfolio an investor should...

Core Strategies Channel

Why ETFs Experience Limit Up/Down Protections

Karrie GordonMay 13, 2022
2022-05-13

In a digital age where information moves in milliseconds and millions of participants can transact...

}
X