Are you getting the best rate from your broker?
Compare your broker's rates now to find out if you can save money
Choose your broker below
Welcome to ETFdb.com. Please help us personalize your experience.
Select the one that best describes you
Etfdb logo
  • ETF
  • PIE
    Pricing Data
    $16.85
    Change: $0.14 (-0.01%)
    Time: 06/14/19
    Previous Close: $16.99
  • Category
  • Emerging Markets Equities
  • ESG Score
Last Updated:

Profile

Vitals

Trading Data

Open: - Volume -
Day Lo - Day Hi -
  • 52 Week Lo: $15.23
  • 52 Week Hi: $20.86
  • AUM: $162.2 M
  • Shares: 9.6 M

Investment Themes

Historical Trading Data

  • 1 Month Avg. Volume: 36,830
  • 3 Month Avg. Volume: 43,597

Alternative ETFs in the Emerging Markets Equities Category

Type Ticker Expense Ratio Assets Avg. Daily Vol YTD Return
Cheapest SPEM 0.11% $2,670.1 M 754,589 6.86%
Largest (AUM) VWO 0.12% $62,077.2 M 13,343,056 7.18%
Most Liquid (Volume) EEM 0.67% $31,172.5 M 67,131,488 5.22%
Top YTD Performer GREK 0.59% $330.5 M 458,934 34.64%

Analyst Report

This ETF offers exposure to emerging market economies, standing out as a potential alternative to cap-weighted products such as EEM or VWO. Instead of simply including the largest emerging market stocks, PIE screens potential components based on relative strength factors, selecting approximately 100 securities. For investors who buy into the investment thesis behind the relative strength strategy, PIE might make for a better way to access emerging economies. The methodology may also be appealing because it avoids the concentration issues that can plague cap-weighted products; though PIE has only 100 or so components, exposure is spread very evenly across the names that make up the portfolio. It's also likely to have a bigger allocation to small caps and mid caps, while EEM and VWO are primarily comprised of large cap stocks. The biggest drawback of PIE is the expenses; the management fee is considerably higher than low cost options such as VWO, and the potentially higher turnover may lead to less-than-optimal tax efficiency. If you buy the relative strength methodology, PIE might be very attractive. Otherwise, there are a number of alternatives, including the equal-weighted EWEM or the RAFI-weighted PXH.

Realtime Rating

Sign Up for Pro to Unlock Data Sign Up

Realtime Rating Summary

The adjacent table gives investors an individual Realtime Rating for PIE on several different metrics, including liquidity, expenses, performance, volatility, dividend, concentration of holdings in addition to an overall rating. The "A+ Metric Rated ETF" field, available to ETFdb Pro members, shows the ETF in the Emerging Markets Equities with the highest Metric Realtime Rating for each individual field. To view all of this data, sign up for a free 14-day trial for ETFdb Pro. To view information on how the ETFdb Realtime Ratings work, click here.

Compare to another ETF

View the Category Report

PIE Overall Realtime Rating:

A+ Overall Rated ETF:

Metric Metric Realtime Rating A+ Metric Rated ETF
Liquidity B+ n/a
Expenses C n/a
Performance
Volatility
Dividend
Concentration

PIE In-Depth Analysis

The following tables and charts contain in-depth metrics for this ETF and compare it to similar peer ETFs within its ETFdb.com Category.

PIE Holdings

Filings Data as of: Jun 14, 2019

All 100 Holdings

Concentration Analysis

This section compares how balanced and deep this ETF is relative to the peer group ETFdb.com Category.

Number of Holdings
Rank: 52 of 83
100
Category Low RWED (2)
Category High IEMG (2486)
% Assets in Top 10
Rank: 44 of 83
26.41%
Category Low EWX (3.87%)
Category High RWED (100.00%)
% Assets in Top 15
Rank: 37 of 83
36.56%
Category Low EWX (5.44%)
Category High RWED (100.00%)
% Assets in Top 50
Rank: 35 of 83
73.08%
Category Low EWX (14.55%)
Category High ADRE (100.29%)

Asset Allocation

Asset Percentage
Common equity 96.38%
Preferred stock 3.62%
ETF Cash Component 0.0%

Sector Breakdown

Sector Percentage
Financials 16.08%
Technology 15.2%
Consumer, Cyclical 14.37%
Consumer, Non-Cyclical 12.0%
Real Estate 11.14%
Industrials 11.08%
Utilities 6.02%
Communications 5.3%
Basic Materials 3.91%
Other 1.99%
Energy 1.32%
Healthcare 0.94%
Non-Equity 0.65%
ETF Cash Component 0.0%

Market Cap Breakdown

Market Cap Percentage
Large cap 57.51%
Mid cap 34.87%
Small cap 7.0%
Micro cap 0.62%
ETF Cash Component 0.0%

Region Breakdown

Region Percentage
Asia 61.51%
Europe 14.18%
Latin America 11.49%
Africa 7.13%
Asia-Pacific 5.1%
Middle East 0.59%
North America 0.0%

Market Tier Breakdown

Region Percentage
Emerging Markets 84.6%
Developed Markets (ex-US) 15.4%
United States 0.0%

Country Breakdown

Country Percentage
China 24.9%
Taiwan 22.52%
United Kingdom 10.35%
Brazil 9.62%
Thailand 9.53%
South Africa 7.13%
Philippines 3.31%
Switzerland 3.27%
India 2.3%
Malaysia 1.8%
Hong Kong 1.79%
Mexico 1.46%
Egypt 0.59%
Hungary 0.57%
Indonesia 0.46%
Colombia 0.41%
United States 0.0%

PIE Expenses & Fees

This section compares the cost efficiency of this ETF to peers in the same ETFdb.com Category.

Expenses Ratio Analysis

ETF Average
0.544%
ETF Wtd. Average
0.20%
Category Average
0.55%
Expense Ratio
Rank: 80 of 83
0.90%
Category Low SPEM (0.11%)
Category High DOGS (1.64%)

Commission Free Trading

This ETF is currently available for commission free trading on the following platforms: (Charles Schwab)

Category Commission Free Trading

There are 10 other ETFs in the Emerging Markets Equities ETFdb.com Category that are also eligible for commission free trading:

PIE ESG Themes and Scores
  • 3.44/10
    ESG Score
  • 12.83%
    ESG Score Global Percentile (%)
  • 39.39%
    ESG Score Peer Percentile (%)
  • ENVIRONMENTALLY RESPONSIBLE
    Environmental Scores
    • Revenue Exposure to Environmental Impact (%)

      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Severe Environment Controversies (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Sustainable Impact Solutions (%)
      4.5%

      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    Carbon Intensity
    • Weighted Average Carbon Intensity (Tons of CO2e / $M Sales)
      293.68

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    Fossil Fuel Reserves
    • Fossil Fuel Reserves (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • High Impact Fossil Fuel Reserves (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    Water Stress
    • Water Stress High Risk Business Segment (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Water Stress High Risk Geography (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Water Stress Exposure Moderate (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Water Stress Exposure High (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Water Stress Exposure Low (%)

      Higher improves ESG score
    Energy Efficiency
    • Revenue Exposure to Energy Efficiency (%)

      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    Alternative Energy
    • Revenue Exposure to Alternative Energy (%)

      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    Green Building
    • Revenue Exposure to Green Building (%)

      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    Pollution Prevention
    • Revenue Exposure to Pollution Prevention (%)

      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    Water Sustainability
    • Revenue Exposure to Water Sustainability (%)

      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
  • SOCIALLY RESPONSIBLE
    Social Scores
    • Revenue Exposure to Social Impact (%)

      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Sustainable Impact Solutions (%)
      4.5%

      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • SRI Exclusion Criteria (%)
      0.0%

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    Affordable Real Estate
    • Revenue Exposure to Affordable Real Estate (%)

      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    Education
    • Revenue Exposure to Education (%)

      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    Major Disease Treatment
    • Revenue Exposure to Major Disease Treatment (%)

      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    Healthy Nutrition
    • Revenue Exposure to Nutrition (%)

      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    Global Sanitation
    • Revenue Exposure to Sanitation (%)

      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    SME Finance
    • Revenue Exposure to SME Finance (%)

      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    Human Rights Violations
    • Human Rights Norms Violation (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Human Rights Norms Violation OR Watch List (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Severe Human Rights Controversies (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    Labor Rights Violations
    • Labor Norms Violation (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Labor Norms Violation OR Watch List (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Severe Labor Controversies (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    Customer Controversies
    • Severe Customer Controversies (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    UN Principles Violations
    • Global Compact Compliance Violation (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Global Compact Compliance Violation OR Watch List (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    Catholic Values
    • Catholic Values Fail (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    Sharia Compliant Investing
    • Islamic Non-Compliant (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    Adult Entertainment
    • Adult Entertainment Involvement (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    Alcohol
    • Alcohol Involvement (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    Gambling
    • Gambling Involvement (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    Nuclear Power
    • Nuclear Power Involvement (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    Tobacco
    • Tobacco Involvement (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    Weapons Involvement
    • Weapons Involvement (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Controversies Weapons Involvement (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    Firearms
    • Civilian Firearms Involvement (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Civilian Firearms Retailer (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Civilian Firearms Producer (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    Predatory Lending
    • Direct Predatory Lending Involvement (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    GMO Involvement
    • Genetic Engineering Involvement (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
  • RESPONSIBLE GOVERNANCE
    Responsible Governance Score
    • Severe Governance Controversies (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    Board Flag
    • Board Flag (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    Board Independence
    • Lack of Independent Board Majority (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Board Independence (0-25%) (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Board Independence (25-50%) (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Board Independence (50-75%) (%)

      Higher improves ESG score
    • Board Independence (75-100%) (%)

      Higher improves ESG score
    Board Diversity
    • No Female Directors (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Three OR More Female Directors (%)

      Higher improves ESG score
    • Females Represent 30% of Directors (%)

      Higher improves ESG score
    Entrenched Board
    • Entrenched Board (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    Overboarding
    • Overboarding (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    Shareholder Rights
    • Negative Director Votes (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Ownership AND Control Flag (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • One Share One Vote (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • No Annual Director Elections (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Does Not Use Majority Voting (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Significant Votes Against Pay Practices (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    Fund Ownership
    • Controlling Shareholder (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Controlling Shareholder Concerns (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Cross Shareholdings (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    Poison Pill
    • Poison Pill (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    Executive Compensation
    • Pay Flag (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • No Pay Performance Link (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Lack of Internal Pay Equity (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Executive Pay Non-Disclosure (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    Accounting Flags
    • Accounting Flag (%)

      Lower improves ESG score

PIE Performance

This section shows how this ETF has performed relative to its peer group ETFdb.com Category.

1 Week Return
Rank: 12 of 81
1.26%
Category Low UAE (-4.93%)
Category High FLSA (4.16%)
4 Week Return
Rank: 21 of 83
4.49%
Category Low EMQQ (-3.18%)
Category High GREK (18.19%)
13 Week Return
Rank: N/A
No Ranking Available
Category Low TUR (-16.79%)
Category High GREK (15.12%)
26 Week Return
Rank: 27 of 80
6.51%
Category Low TUR (-6.33%)
Category High GREK (27.00%)
Year to Date Return
Rank: 20 of 80
8.29%
Category Low TUR (-8.02%)
Category High GREK (34.64%)
1 Year Return
Rank: 71 of 74
-18.48%
Category Low NGE (-25.28%)
Category High ERUS (23.40%)
3 Year Return
Rank: 42 of 57
17.58%
Category Low NGE (-38.73%)
Category High ERUS (64.74%)
5 Year Return
Rank: 25 of 41
-2.31%
Category Low NGE (-71.58%)
Category High ERUS (17.05%)

PIE Fund Flows

This section compares the fund flows of this ETF to peers in the same ETFdb.com Category.

1 Week Fund Flow
Rank: N/A
No Ranking Available
Category Low RSX (‑$80.9 M)
Category High MFEM ($80.5 M)
4 Week Fund Flow
Rank: N/A
No Ranking Available
Category Low EEM (‑$273.4 M)
Category High KSA ($143.6 M)
13 Week Fund Flow
Rank: 32 of 58
$0.1 M
Category Low EEM (‑$2,058.3 M)
Category High VWO ($668.4 M)
26 Week Fund Flow
Rank: 63 of 70
‑$23.8 M
Category Low RSX (‑$368.5 M)
Category High IEMG ($6,264.6 M)
Year to Date Fund Flow
Rank: 63 of 69
‑$23.8 M
Category Low RSX (‑$345.1 M)
Category High IEMG ($5,371.8 M)
1 Year Fund Flow
Rank: 66 of 72
‑$83.9 M
Category Low EEM (‑$1,020.9 M)
Category High IEMG ($13,307.8 M)
3 Year Fund Flow
Rank: 62 of 75
‑$0.6 M
Category Low RSX (‑$931.6 M)
Category High IEMG ($42,953.9 M)
5 Year Fund Flow
Rank: 67 of 75
‑$85.3 M
Category Low EEM (‑$5,223.8 M)
Category High IEMG ($52,149.3 M)

Brought to You by ETF Flows

Charts

The following charts can be customized to display historical performance in a number of different formats, including line charts, bar charts, and candlesticks. Time periods can be adjusted to increase or decrease the period shown, ranging from five minutes to several months.

The following chart also includes the option to compare the performance of PIE relative to other ETFs and benchmarks or to include indicators such as Bollinger Bands, relative strength, and moving averages.

PIE Valuation

This section shows how the P/E multiple of this ETF compares to the peer group ETFdb.com Category.

P/E Ratio
Rank: 79 of 81
18.31
Category Low NGE (4.9)
Category High ECON (22.35)

PIE Dividend

This section shows how the dividend yield of this ETF compares to the peer group ETFdb.com Category.

Dividend
$0.19
Dividend Date
2018-12-24
Annual Dividend Rate
$0.52
Annual Dividend Yield
Rank: 34 of 80
3.02%
Category Low FDEM (0.10%)
Category High EEMO (11.51%)

PIE Technicals

Volatility Analysis

This section shows how the volatility of this ETF compares to the peer group ETFdb.com Category.

5 Day Volatility
Rank: 28 of 82
93.26%
Category Low REDV (10.25%)
Category High EMQQ (234.41%)
20 Day Volatility
Rank: 19 of 82
16.50%
Category Low BBRC (6.54%)
Category High GREK (31.42%)
50 Day Volatility
Rank: 18 of 82
17.66%
Category Low BBRC (10.39%)
Category High TUR (29.05%)
200 Day Volatility
Rank: 25 of 80
16.29%
Category Low BBRC (11.19%)
Category High TUR (34.16%)
Beta
Rank: 47 of 82
0.76
Category Low NGE (0.08)
Category High FLZA (2.18)
Standard Deviation
Rank: 36 of 73
1.26%
Category Low FRN (0.54%)
Category High RFEM (3.25%)

Technicals

  • 20 Day MA: $16.43
  • 60 Day MA: $16.85
  • MACD 15 Period: 0.31
  • MACD 100 Period: 0.09
  • Williams % Range 10 Day: 39.13
  • Williams % Range 20 Day: 21.60
  • RSI 10 Day: 57
  • RSI 20 Day: 53
  • RSI 30 Day: 52
  • Ultimate Oscillator: 55

Bollinger Brands

  • Lower Bollinger (10 Day): $16.32
  • Upper Bollinger (10 Day): $17.18
  • Lower Bollinger (20 Day): $15.69
  • Upper Bollinger (20 Day): $17.17
  • Lower Bollinger (30 Day): $15.74
  • Upper Bollinger (30 Day): $17.36

Support & Resistance

  • Support Level 1: $16.79
  • Support Level 2: $16.73
  • Resistance Level 1: $16.92
  • Resistance Level 2: $16.99

Stochastic

  • Stochastic Oscillator %D (1 Day): 34.17
  • Stochastic Oscillator %D (5 Day): 56.74
  • Stochastic Oscillator %K (1 Day): 40.86
  • Stochastic Oscillator %K (5 Day): 70.66

Fact Sheet

Fact sheets are issued by the ETF provider and framed by ETFdb.com. Information contained within the fact sheet is not guaranteed to be timely or accurate.

Download the fact sheet PDF

Source: LSEG Information Services (US), Inc. (“LSEG”) © LSEG 2016. All rights in the XTF data, ratings and / or underlying data contained in this communication (“the XTF information”) vest in LSEG and/or its licensors. Neither LSEG nor its licensors accept any liability arising out of the use of, reliance on or any errors or omissions in the XTF information. No further distribution of the XTF information is permitted without LSEG’s express written consent. LSEG does not promote, sponsor or endorse the content of this communication.

Copyright MSCI ESG Research LLC [2018]. All Rights Reserved. MSCI ESG Research LLC’s (“MSCI ESG”) Fund Metrics products (the “Information”) provide environmental, social and governance data with respect to underlying securities within more than 23,000 multi-asset class Mutual Funds and ETFs globally. MSCI ESG is a Registered Investment Adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. MSCI ESG materials have not been submitted, to nor received approval from, the US SEC or any other regulatory body. None of the information constitutes an offer to buy or sell, or a promotion or recommendation of, any security, financial instrument or product or trading strategy, nor should it be taken as an indication or guarantee of any future performance, analysis, forecast or prediction. None of the Information can be used to determine which securities to buy or sell or when to buy or sell them. The Information is provided “as is” and the user of the Information assumes the entire risk of any use it may make or permit to be made of the Information. All Information is provided solely for your internal use, and may not be reproduced or redisseminated in any form without express prior written permission from MSCI. Neither MSCI ESG nor any of its affiliates or any third party involved in or related to creating any Information makes any express or implied warranties, representations or guarantees, and in no event will MSCI ESG or any such affiliate or third party have any liability for any direct, indirect, special, punitive, consequential or any other damages (including lost profits) relating to any Information. More information on MSCI ESG Fund Metrics, provided by MSCI ESG Research LLC, can be found at https://www.msci.com/esg-fund-metrics.
© 2019 Market data provided is at least 15-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions.

Information is provided 'as is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use, please see disclaimer.
Help & Info
Tools
More Tools
Explore ETFs
Legal

Advertise With Us

© 2019 Mitre Media