Are you getting the best rate from your broker?
Compare your broker's rates now to find out if you can save money
Choose your broker below
Welcome to ETFdb.com. Please help us personalize your experience.
Select the one that best describes you

PIE
Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF

Price: $19.33
Change: $0.16 (-0.01%)
Category: Emerging Markets Equities
Last Updated:

Vitals

Trading Data

Open - Volume -
Day Lo - Day Hi -
  • Open
  • Volume
  • Day Lo
  • Day Hi
  • 52 Week Lo $15.55
  • 52 Week Hi $20.03
  • AUM $204.6 M
  • Shares 10.5 M

Investment Themes

Historical Trading Data

  • 1 Month Avg. Volume 103,595
  • 3 Month Avg. Volume 78,841

Alternative ETFs in the Emerging Markets Equities Category

Type Symbol Expense Ratio Assets Avg. Daily Vol YTD Return
Cheapest SPEM 0.11% $3.9 B 995,602 -0.74%
Largest (AUM) VWO 0.12% $67.0 B 11 M -0.40%
Most Liquid (Volume) EEM 0.68% $31.1 B 60 M -0.60%
Top YTD Performer NGE 0.88% $44.7 M 28,776 9.64%

Top 10 Holdings

Concentration Analysis

This section compares how balanced and deep this ETF is relative to the peer group ETFdb.com Category.

Number of Holdings
101
Low: HEEM (2)
High: IEMG (2465)
Rank:
46 of 75
% Assets in Top 10
24.72%
Low: EWX (4.41%)
High: RWED (100.00%)
Rank:
30 of 75
% Assets in Top 15
33.96%
Low: EWX (5.91%)
High: RWED (100.00%)
Rank:
39 of 75
% Assets in Top 50
70.72%
Low: EWX (14.78%)
High: RSX (100.00%)
Rank:
33 of 75
 
View Summary Analysis
 
101
Number of Holdings
24.72%
% Assets in Top 10
33.96%
% Assets in Top 15
70.72%
% Assets in Top 50
 
View Detailed Analysis
 

101
Number of Holdings
24.72%
% Assets in Top 10
33.96%
% Assets in Top 15
70.72%
% Assets in Top 50
 
View Detailed Analysis
 
Number of Holdings
101
Rank
46 of 75
Low
HEEM (2)
High
IEMG (2465)
% Assets in Top 10
24.72%
Rank
30 of 75
Low
EWX (4.41%)
High
RWED (100.00%)
% Assets in Top 15
33.96%
Rank
39 of 75
Low
EWX (5.91%)
High
RWED (100.00%)
% Assets in Top 50
70.72%
Rank
33 of 75
Low
EWX (14.78%)
High
RSX (100.00%)

 
View Summary Analysis
 

Sector Breakdown

Asset Percentage
Common equity 97.5%
Preferred stock 2.5%
Sector Percentage
Technology 15.85%
Consumer, Cyclical 15.8%
Financials 14.37%
Basic Materials 11.63%
Industrials 10.94%
Consumer, Non-Cyclical 8.72%
Healthcare 7.03%
Real Estate 5.92%
Other 5.84%
Communications 3.28%
Energy 0.61%
Market Cap Percentage
Large cap 75.74%
Mid cap 20.43%
Small cap 3.83%
Region Percentage
Asia 65.17%
Latin America 13.01%
Europe 9.23%
Africa 8.18%
Asia-Pacific 4.41%
Region Percentage
Emerging Markets 89.11%
Developed Markets (ex-US) 10.89%
Country Percentage
Taiwan 23.07%
China 21.72%
Brazil 11.92%
Thailand 9.38%
South Africa 8.18%
Malaysia 8.08%
United Kingdom 8.08%
Philippines 2.08%
India 1.8%
Hong Kong 1.39%
Indonesia 1.12%
Mexico 1.09%
Singapore 0.93%
Hungary 0.67%
Switzerland 0.49%
 
View Less Charts
 
Asset Percentage
Common equity 97.5%
Preferred stock 2.5%
 
View More Charts
 

PIE Valuation

This section shows how the P/E multiple of this ETF compares to the peer group ETFdb.com Category.

P/E Ratio
17.77
Low: NGE (4.8)
High: EMQQ (23.51)
Rank:
72 of 75
P/E Ratio
17.77
Rank
72 of 75
Low
NGE (4.8)
High
EMQQ (23.51)

PIE Dividend

This section shows how the dividend yield of this ETF compares to the peer group ETFdb.com Category.

Dividend
$0.15
Dividend Date
2019-12-23
Annual Dividend Rate
$0.37

$0.15
Dividend
2019-12-23
Dividend Date
$0.37
Annual Dividend Rate
Annual Dividend Yield
1.89%
Low: EMEM (0.28%)
High: EZA (12.76%)
Rank:
71 of 75
Annual Dividend Yield
1.89%
Rank
71 of 75
Low
EMEM (0.28%)
High
EZA (12.76%)

PIE Fund Flows

This section compares the fund flows of this ETF to peers in the same ETFdb.com Category.

Realtime Rating

The adjacent table gives investors an individual Realtime Rating for PIE on several different metrics, including liquidity, expenses, performance, volatility, dividend, concentration of holdings in addition to an overall rating. The "A+ Metric Rated ETF" field, available to ETFdb Pro members, shows the ETF in the Emerging Markets Equities with the highest Metric Realtime Rating for each individual field. To view all of this data, sign up for a free 14-day trial for ETFdb Pro. To view information on how the ETFdb Realtime Ratings work, click here.

Sign Up for Pro to Unlock Data Sign Up
Metric Metric Realtime Rating A+ Metric Rated ETF
Liquidity B+ n/a
Expenses C n/a
Performance
Volatility
Dividend
Concentration

A+ Overall Rated ETF:

Analyst Report

This ETF offers exposure to emerging market economies, standing out as a potential alternative to cap-weighted products such as EEM or VWO. Instead of simply including the largest emerging market stocks, PIE screens potential components based on relative strength factors, selecting approximately 100 securities. For investors who buy into the investment thesis behind the relative strength strategy, PIE might make for a better way to access emerging economies. The methodology may also be appealing because it avoids the concentration issues that can plague cap-weighted products; though PIE has only 100 or so components, exposure is spread very evenly across the names that make up the portfolio. It's also likely to have a bigger allocation to small caps and mid caps, while EEM and VWO are primarily comprised of large cap stocks. The biggest drawback of PIE is the expenses; the management fee is considerably higher than low cost options such as VWO, and the potentially higher turnover may lead to less-than-optimal tax efficiency. If you buy the relative strength methodology, PIE might be very attractive. Otherwise, there are a number of alternatives, including the equal-weighted EWEM or the RAFI-weighted PXH.

PIE Expenses & Fees

This section compares the cost efficiency of this ETF to peers in the same ETFdb.com Category.

Expenses Ratio Analysis

ETF Average
0.544%
ETF Wtd. Average
0.19%
Category Average
0.54%
ESG Themes and Scores
3.53/10
ESG Score
12.68%
Global Percentile
9.2%
Peer Percentile
Environmental
Social
Governance
  • Environmental Scores
    • Revenue Exposure to Environmental Impact (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Severe Environment Controversies (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Sustainable Impact Solutions (%)
      4.27%
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    Carbon Intensity
    • Weighted Average Carbon Intensity (Tons of CO2e / $M Sales)
      364.38
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    Fossil Fuel Reserves
    • Fossil Fuel Reserves (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • High Impact Fossil Fuel Reserves (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    Water Stress
    • Water Stress High Risk Business Segment (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Water Stress High Risk Geography (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Water Stress Exposure Moderate (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Water Stress Exposure High (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Water Stress Exposure Low (%)
      Higher improves ESG score
    Energy Efficiency
    • Revenue Exposure to Energy Efficiency (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    Alternative Energy
    • Revenue Exposure to Alternative Energy (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    Green Building
    • Revenue Exposure to Green Building (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    Pollution Prevention
    • Revenue Exposure to Pollution Prevention (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    Water Sustainability
    • Revenue Exposure to Water Sustainability (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
  • Social Scores
    • Revenue Exposure to Social Impact (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Sustainable Impact Solutions (%)
      4.27%
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • SRI Exclusion Criteria (%)
      0.85%
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    Affordable Real Estate
    • Revenue Exposure to Affordable Real Estate (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    Education
    • Revenue Exposure to Education (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    Major Disease Treatment
    • Revenue Exposure to Major Disease Treatment (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    Healthy Nutrition
    • Revenue Exposure to Nutrition (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    Global Sanitation
    • Revenue Exposure to Sanitation (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    SME Finance
    • Revenue Exposure to SME Finance (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    Human Rights Violations
    • Human Rights Norms Violation (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Human Rights Norms Violation OR Watch List (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Severe Human Rights Controversies (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    Labor Rights Violations
    • Labor Norms Violation (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Labor Norms Violation OR Watch List (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Severe Labor Controversies (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    Customer Controversies
    • Severe Customer Controversies (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    UN Principles Violations
    • Global Compact Compliance Violation (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Global Compact Compliance Violation OR Watch List (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    Catholic Values
    • Catholic Values Fail (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    Sharia Compliant Investing
    • Islamic Non-Compliant (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    Adult Entertainment
    • Adult Entertainment Involvement (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    Alcohol
    • Alcohol Involvement (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    Gambling
    • Gambling Involvement (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    Nuclear Power
    • Nuclear Power Involvement (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    Tobacco
    • Tobacco Involvement (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    Weapons Involvement
    • Weapons Involvement (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Controversies Weapons Involvement (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    Firearms
    • Civilian Firearms Involvement (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Civilian Firearms Retailer (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Civilian Firearms Producer (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    Predatory Lending
    • Direct Predatory Lending Involvement (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    GMO Involvement
    • Genetic Engineering Involvement (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
  • Responsible Governance Score
    • Severe Governance Controversies (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    Board Flag
    • Board Flag (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    Board Independence
    • Lack of Independent Board Majority (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Board Independence (0-25%) (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Board Independence (25-50%) (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Board Independence (50-75%) (%)
      Higher improves ESG score
    • Board Independence (75-100%) (%)
      Higher improves ESG score
    Board Diversity
    • No Female Directors (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Three OR More Female Directors (%)
      Higher improves ESG score
    • Females Represent 30% of Directors (%)
      Higher improves ESG score
    Entrenched Board
    • Entrenched Board (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    Overboarding
    • Overboarding (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    Shareholder Rights
    • Negative Director Votes (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Ownership AND Control Flag (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • One Share One Vote (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • No Annual Director Elections (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Does Not Use Majority Voting (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Significant Votes Against Pay Practices (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    Fund Ownership
    • Controlling Shareholder (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Controlling Shareholder Concerns (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Cross Shareholdings (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    Poison Pill
    • Poison Pill (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    Executive Compensation
    • Pay Flag (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • No Pay Performance Link (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Lack of Internal Pay Equity (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Executive Pay Non-Disclosure (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    Accounting Flags
    • Accounting Flag (%)
      Lower improves ESG score

PIE Performance

This section shows how this ETF has performed relative to its peer group ETFdb.com Category.

1 Week Return
-3.35%
Low: EMQQ (-5.16%)
High: RSXJ (1.31%)
Rank:
57 of 75
4 Week Return
0.48%
Low: FLZA (-3.90%)
High: RSXJ (9.83%)
Rank:
21 of 74
13 Week Return
5.25%
Low: EGPT (-8.18%)
High: RSXJ (20.69%)
Rank:
47 of 75
26 Week Return
8.98%
Low: UAE (-7.35%)
High: ERUS (18.79%)
Rank:
10 of 75
Year to Date Return
0.91%
Low: FLZA (-3.56%)
High: NGE (9.64%)
Rank:
15 of 75
1 Year Return
21.34%
Low: NGE (-6.07%)
High: GREK (42.58%)
Rank:
7 of 72
3 Year Return
33.05%
Low: UAE (-12.95%)
High: ERUS (54.66%)
Rank:
11 of 53
5 Year Return
16.37%
Low: EGPT (-51.06%)
High: RSXJ (135.61%)
Rank:
27 of 41
 
View Summary Analysis
 
-3.35%
1 Week Return
0.48%
4 Week Return
5.25%
13 Week Return
8.98%
26 Week Return
0.91%
Year to Date Return
21.34%
1 Year Return
33.05%
3 Year Return
16.37%
5 Year Return
 
View Detailed Analysis
 

-3.35%
1 Week Return
0.48%
4 Week Return
5.25%
13 Week Return
8.98%
26 Week Return
0.91%
Year to Date Return
21.34%
1 Year Return
33.05%
3 Year Return
16.37%
5 Year Return
 
View Detailed Analysis
 
1 Week Return
-3.35%
Rank
57 of 75
Low
EMQQ (-5.16%)
High
RSXJ (1.31%)
4 Week Return
0.48%
Rank
21 of 74
Low
FLZA (-3.90%)
High
RSXJ (9.83%)
13 Week Return
5.25%
Rank
47 of 75
Low
EGPT (-8.18%)
High
RSXJ (20.69%)
26 Week Return
8.98%
Rank
10 of 75
Low
UAE (-7.35%)
High
ERUS (18.79%)
Year to Date Return
0.91%
Rank
15 of 75
Low
FLZA (-3.56%)
High
NGE (9.64%)
1 Year Return
21.34%
Rank
7 of 72
Low
NGE (-6.07%)
High
GREK (42.58%)
3 Year Return
33.05%
Rank
11 of 53
Low
UAE (-12.95%)
High
ERUS (54.66%)
5 Year Return
16.37%
Rank
27 of 41
Low
EGPT (-51.06%)
High
RSXJ (135.61%)

 
View Summary Analysis
 

PIE Charts

PIE Technicals

Volatility Analysis

This section shows how the volatility of this ETF compares to the peer group ETFdb.com Category.

Technicals

  • 20 Day MA $19.53
  • 60 Day MA $18.93
  • MACD 15 Period -0.28
  • MACD 100 Period 0.89
  • Williams % Range 10 Day 95.27
  • Williams % Range 20 Day 80.11
  • RSI 10 Day 44
  • RSI 20 Day 52
  • RSI 30 Day 55
  • Ultimate Oscillator 45

Bollinger Brands

  • Lower Bollinger (10 Day) $19.37
  • Upper Bollinger (10 Day) $20.06
  • Lower Bollinger (20 Day) $19.04
  • Upper Bollinger (20 Day) $20.01
  • Lower Bollinger (30 Day) $18.63
  • Upper Bollinger (30 Day) $20.03

Support & Resistance

  • Support Level 1 $19.21
  • Support Level 2 $19.10
  • Resistance Level 1 $19.51
  • Resistance Level 2 $19.70

Stochastic

  • Stochastic Oscillator %D (1 Day) 37.86
  • Stochastic Oscillator %D (5 Day) 30.91
  • Stochastic Oscillator %K (1 Day) 50.48
  • Stochastic Oscillator %K (5 Day) 50.05

Fact Sheet

Fact sheets are issued by the ETF provider and framed by ETFdb.com. Information contained within the fact sheet is not guaranteed to be timely or accurate.

Download the fact sheet PDF

Brought to You by ETF Flows

Source: LSEG Information Services (US), Inc. (“LSEG”) © LSEG 2016. All rights in the XTF data, ratings and / or underlying data contained in this communication (“the XTF information”) vest in LSEG and/or its licensors. Neither LSEG nor its licensors accept any liability arising out of the use of, reliance on or any errors or omissions in the XTF information. No further distribution of the XTF information is permitted without LSEG’s express written consent. LSEG does not promote, sponsor or endorse the content of this communication.

Copyright MSCI ESG Research LLC [2018]. All Rights Reserved. MSCI ESG Research LLC’s (“MSCI ESG”) Fund Metrics products (the “Information”) provide environmental, social and governance data with respect to underlying securities within more than 23,000 multi-asset class Mutual Funds and ETFs globally. MSCI ESG is a Registered Investment Adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. MSCI ESG materials have not been submitted, to nor received approval from, the US SEC or any other regulatory body. None of the information constitutes an offer to buy or sell, or a promotion or recommendation of, any security, financial instrument or product or trading strategy, nor should it be taken as an indication or guarantee of any future performance, analysis, forecast or prediction. None of the Information can be used to determine which securities to buy or sell or when to buy or sell them. The Information is provided “as is” and the user of the Information assumes the entire risk of any use it may make or permit to be made of the Information. All Information is provided solely for your internal use, and may not be reproduced or redisseminated in any form without express prior written permission from MSCI. Neither MSCI ESG nor any of its affiliates or any third party involved in or related to creating any Information makes any express or implied warranties, representations or guarantees, and in no event will MSCI ESG or any such affiliate or third party have any liability for any direct, indirect, special, punitive, consequential or any other damages (including lost profits) relating to any Information. More information on MSCI ESG Fund Metrics, provided by MSCI ESG Research LLC, can be found at https://www.msci.com/esg-fund-metrics.
© 2020 Market data provided is at least 15-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions.

Information is provided 'as is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use, please see disclaimer.
Help & Info
Tools
More Tools
Explore ETFs
Legal