Are you getting the best rate from your broker?
Compare your broker's rates now to find out if you can save money

Choose your broker below
Welcome to ETFdb.com. Please help us personalize your experience.

Select the one that best describes you
Etfdb logo
  • ETF
  • FVD
    Pricing Data
    $33.10
    Change: $0.05 (0.0%)
    Time: 04/24/19
    Previous Close: $33.05
  • Category
  • Large Cap Blend Equities
  • ESG Score
Last Updated:

Profile

Vitals

Trading Data

Open: - Volume -
Day Lo - Day Hi -
  • 52 Week Lo: $27.47
  • 52 Week Hi: $33.18
  • AUM: $5,816.8 M
  • Shares: 176.0 M

Investment Themes

Historical Trading Data

  • 1 Month Avg. Volume: 904,661
  • 3 Month Avg. Volume: 914,457

Alternative ETFs in the Large Cap Blend Equities Category

Type Ticker Expense Ratio Assets Avg. Daily Vol YTD Return
Cheapest SFY $42.2 M 0
Largest (AUM) SPY 0.09% $280,189.6 M 71,687,720 17.44%
Most Liquid (Volume) SPY 0.09% $280,189.6 M 71,687,720 17.44%
Top YTD Performer OGIG 0.48% $50.4 M 24,906 31.31%

Analyst Report

This unique ETF gives investors an opportunity to access stocks of dividend paying companies, an asset class that may have appeal to long-term investors looking to maximize current returns from the equity portion of their portfolios or to those with more of a short-term focus looking to capitalize on bargain prices among value stocks. FVD relies on rankings assigned by Value Line, a research company that analyzes stocks using a proprietary methodology. As such, FVD is one of the ETFs that blurs the lines between active and passive management, seeking to replicate an index that employs quant-based analysis to determine its holdings. FVD gives investors balanced exposure to dividend-paying stocks, spreading exposure across a variety of sectors and market capitalizations and avoiding any significant concentrations in individual securities. The relatively narrow focus of this fund may limit its usefulness to investors seeking broad exposure, though FVD can be useful for those looking to focus on dividends and who believe the underlying Value Line methodology is sound. A potential drawback of this ETF is fees; FVD is considerably more expensive than most dividend ETFs, such as VTV.

Realtime Rating

Sign Up for Pro to Unlock Data Sign Up

Realtime Rating Summary

The adjacent table gives investors an individual Realtime Rating for FVD on several different metrics, including liquidity, expenses, performance, volatility, dividend, concentration of holdings in addition to an overall rating. The "A+ Metric Rated ETF" field, available to ETFdb Pro members, shows the ETF in the Large Cap Blend Equities with the highest Metric Realtime Rating for each individual field. To view all of this data, sign up for a free 14-day trial for ETFdb Pro. To view information on how the ETFdb Realtime Ratings work, click here.

Compare to another ETF

View the Category Report

FVD Overall Realtime Rating:

A+ Overall Rated ETF:

Metric Metric Realtime Rating A+ Metric Rated ETF
Liquidity A- n/a
Expenses C+ n/a
Performance
Volatility
Dividend
Concentration

FVD In-Depth Analysis

The following tables and charts contain in-depth metrics for this ETF and compare it to similar peer ETFs within its ETFdb.com Category.

FVD Holdings

Filings Data as of: Apr 23, 2019

Concentration Analysis

This section compares how balanced and deep this ETF is relative to the peer group ETFdb.com Category.

Number of Holdings
Rank: 154 of 377
188
Category Low RWVG (2)
Category High ITOT (3219)
% Assets in Top 10
Rank: 13 of 377
5.91%
Category Low EUSA (2.18%)
Category High DFND (147.12%)
% Assets in Top 15
Rank: 365 of 377
8.80%
Category Low EUSA (3.16%)
Category High DFND (152.88%)
% Assets in Top 50
Rank: 357 of 377
28.50%
Category Low EUSA (9.66%)
Category High DFND (189.63%)

Asset Allocation

Asset Percentage
Common equity 99.73%
ETF Cash Component 0.27%

Sector Breakdown

Sector Percentage
Financials 20.76%
Utilities 19.38%
Industrials 13.53%
Consumer, Non-Cyclical 12.16%
Technology 6.59%
Consumer, Cyclical 5.9%
Healthcare 5.01%
Real Estate 4.58%
Communications 4.32%
Basic Materials 3.29%
Energy 2.65%
Other 1.56%
ETF Cash Component 0.27%

Market Cap Breakdown

Market Cap Percentage
Large cap 66.32%
Mid cap 20.88%
Small cap 12.0%
Micro cap 0.54%
ETF Cash Component 0.27%

Region Breakdown

Region Percentage
North America 89.72%
Europe 8.13%
Asia 1.09%
Asia-Pacific 1.05%

Market Tier Breakdown

Region Percentage
United States 84.44%
Developed Markets (ex-US) 14.47%
Emerging Markets 1.09%

Country Breakdown

Country Percentage
United States 84.44%
Canada 5.28%
United Kingdom 3.76%
Switzerland 1.69%
Japan 1.05%
France 1.03%
Taiwan 0.59%
Belgium 0.58%
Spain 0.54%
Netherlands 0.54%
India 0.5%

FVD Expenses & Fees

This section compares the cost efficiency of this ETF to peers in the same ETFdb.com Category.

Expenses Ratio Analysis

ETF Average
0.546%
ETF Wtd. Average
0.21%
Category Average
0.41%
Expense Ratio
Rank: 335 of 376
0.70%
Category Low BBUS (0.02%)
Category High TERM (1.50%)

Commission Free Trading

This ETF is not currently available for commission free trading on any platforms.

Category Commission Free Trading

There are 22 other ETFs in the Large Cap Blend Equities ETFdb.com Category that are also eligible for commission free trading:

FVD ESG Themes and Scores
  • 5.59/10
    ESG Score
  • 51.73%
    ESG Score Global Percentile (%)
  • 72.97%
    ESG Score Peer Percentile (%)
    • Revenue Exposure to Environmental Impact (%)

      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Severe Environment Controversies (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Sustainable Impact Solutions (%)
      4.61%

      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Weighted Average Carbon Intensity (Tons of CO2e / $M Sales)
      633.71

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Fossil Fuel Reserves (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • High Impact Fossil Fuel Reserves (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Water Stress High Risk Business Segment (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Water Stress High Risk Geography (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Water Stress Exposure Moderate (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Water Stress Exposure High (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Water Stress Exposure Low (%)

      Higher improves ESG score
    • Revenue Exposure to Energy Efficiency (%)

      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Revenue Exposure to Alternative Energy (%)

      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Revenue Exposure to Green Building (%)

      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Revenue Exposure to Pollution Prevention (%)

      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Revenue Exposure to Water Sustainability (%)

      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Revenue Exposure to Social Impact (%)

      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Sustainable Impact Solutions (%)
      4.61%

      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • SRI Exclusion Criteria (%)
      14.96%

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Revenue Exposure to Affordable Real Estate (%)

      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Revenue Exposure to Education (%)

      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Revenue Exposure to Major Disease Treatment (%)

      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Revenue Exposure to Nutrition (%)

      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Revenue Exposure to Sanitation (%)

      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Revenue Exposure to SME Finance (%)

      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Human Rights Norms Violation (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Human Rights Norms Violation OR Watch List (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Severe Human Rights Controversies (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Labor Norms Violation (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Labor Norms Violation OR Watch List (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Severe Labor Controversies (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Severe Customer Controversies (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Global Compact Compliance Violation (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Global Compact Compliance Violation OR Watch List (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Catholic Values Fail (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Islamic Non-Compliant (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Adult Entertainment Involvement (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Alcohol Involvement (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Gambling Involvement (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Nuclear Power Involvement (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Tobacco Involvement (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Weapons Involvement (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Controversies Weapons Involvement (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Civilian Firearms Involvement (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Civilian Firearms Retailer (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Civilian Firearms Producer (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Direct Predatory Lending Involvement (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Genetic Engineering Involvement (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Severe Governance Controversies (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Board Flag (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Lack of Independent Board Majority (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Board Independence (0-25%) (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Board Independence (25-50%) (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Board Independence (50-75%) (%)

      Higher improves ESG score
    • Board Independence (75-100%) (%)

      Higher improves ESG score
    • No Female Directors (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Three OR More Female Directors (%)

      Higher improves ESG score
    • Females Represent 30% of Directors (%)

      Higher improves ESG score
    • Entrenched Board (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Overboarding (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Negative Director Votes (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Ownership AND Control Flag (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • One Share One Vote (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • No Annual Director Elections (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Does Not Use Majority Voting (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Significant Votes Against Pay Practices (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Controlling Shareholder (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Controlling Shareholder Concerns (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Cross Shareholdings (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Poison Pill (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Pay Flag (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • No Pay Performance Link (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Lack of Internal Pay Equity (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Executive Pay Non-Disclosure (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Accounting Flag (%)

      Lower improves ESG score

FVD Performance

This section shows how this ETF has performed relative to its peer group ETFdb.com Category.

1 Week Return
Rank: 196 of 371
0.64%
Category Low FNG (-4.31%)
Category High IUS (4.47%)
4 Week Return
Rank: 308 of 370
2.54%
Category Low FNG (-7.01%)
Category High RWCD (10.75%)
13 Week Return
Rank: 227 of 361
9.08%
Category Low FNG (-8.32%)
Category High TTTN (22.13%)
26 Week Return
Rank: 158 of 345
10.63%
Category Low FNG (-22.07%)
Category High OGIG (27.56%)
Year to Date Return
Rank: 256 of 352
14.33%
Category Low TERM (-9.64%)
Category High OGIG (31.31%)
1 Year Return
Rank: 62 of 323
13.91%
Category Low FNG (-27.83%)
Category High MILN (24.68%)
3 Year Return
Rank: 139 of 220
36.98%
Category Low FCAN (3.59%)
Category High ARKW (181.69%)
5 Year Return
Rank: 66 of 165
67.67%
Category Low FTAG (-59.34%)
Category High FDN (156.17%)

FVD Fund Flows

This section compares the fund flows of this ETF to peers in the same ETFdb.com Category.

1 Week Fund Flow
Rank: N/A
No Ranking Available
Category Low SPY (‑$1,315.5 M)
Category High IVV ($379.3 M)
4 Week Fund Flow
Rank: 13 of 243
$215.5 M
Category Low QQQ (‑$739.5 M)
Category High SPY ($6,710.6 M)
13 Week Fund Flow
Rank: 14 of 331
$670.2 M
Category Low IWD (‑$1,784.3 M)
Category High SPY ($6,758.5 M)
26 Week Fund Flow
Rank: 22 of 347
$1,058.5 M
Category High IVV ($9,931.2 M)
Year to Date Fund Flow
Rank: 13 of 337
$766.4 M
Category Low IWD (‑$3,722.4 M)
Category High VOO ($6,417.7 M)
1 Year Fund Flow
Rank: 29 of 355
$1,239.9 M
Category Low IWF (‑$1,897.4 M)
Category High IVV ($19,880.5 M)
3 Year Fund Flow
Rank: 30 of 362
$3,207.6 M
Category Low IWF (‑$2,201.7 M)
Category High IVV ($65,558.9 M)
5 Year Fund Flow
Rank: 34 of 362
$3,853.3 M
Category Low MOO (‑$2,365.8 M)
Category High IVV ($74,965.6 M)

Brought to You by ETF Flows


Charts

The following charts can be customized to display historical performance in a number of different formats, including line charts, bar charts, and candlesticks. Time periods can be adjusted to increase or decrease the period shown, ranging from five minutes to several months.

The following chart also includes the option to compare the performance of FVD relative to other ETFs and benchmarks or to include indicators such as Bollinger Bands, relative strength, and moving averages.

FVD Valuation

This section shows how the P/E multiple of this ETF compares to the peer group ETFdb.com Category.

P/E Ratio
Rank: 223 of 354
17.93
Category Low WBIL (-9899.0)
Category High PNQI (62.13)

FVD Dividend

This section shows how the dividend yield of this ETF compares to the peer group ETFdb.com Category.

Dividend
$0.15
Dividend Date
2019-03-21
Annual Dividend Rate
$0.74
Annual Dividend Yield
Rank: 109 of 347
2.27%
Category Low ESPO (0.03%)
Category High QYLD (10.98%)

FVD Technicals

Volatility Analysis

This section shows how the volatility of this ETF compares to the peer group ETFdb.com Category.

5 Day Volatility
Rank: 326 of 373
10.03%
Category Low JMOM (0.21%)
Category High SOCL (205.57%)
20 Day Volatility
Rank: 336 of 369
5.76%
Category Low PBP (3.17%)
Category High VETS (37.58%)
50 Day Volatility
Rank: 341 of 360
7.05%
Category Low TERM (4.59%)
Category High VETS (29.54%)
200 Day Volatility
Rank: 317 of 346
12.29%
Category Low CCOR (6.08%)
Category High ARKW (30.36%)
Beta
Rank: 332 of 360
0.73
Category Low VETS (-3.18)
Category High WBIF (27.71)
Standard Deviation
Rank: 255 of 311
1.10%
Category Low LVL (0.33%)
Category High ONEQ (15.19%)

Technicals

  • 20 Day MA: $32.76
  • 60 Day MA: $32.08
  • MACD 15 Period: 0.25
  • MACD 100 Period: 1.92
  • Williams % Range 10 Day: 14.34
  • Williams % Range 20 Day: 8.02
  • RSI 10 Day: 67
  • RSI 20 Day: 66
  • RSI 30 Day: 64
  • Ultimate Oscillator: 50

Bollinger Brands

  • Lower Bollinger (10 Day): $32.68
  • Upper Bollinger (10 Day): $33.16
  • Lower Bollinger (20 Day): $32.29
  • Upper Bollinger (20 Day): $33.20
  • Lower Bollinger (30 Day): $31.94
  • Upper Bollinger (30 Day): $33.20

Support & Resistance

  • Support Level 1: $33.02
  • Support Level 2: $32.94
  • Resistance Level 1: $33.18
  • Resistance Level 2: $33.26

Stochastic

  • Stochastic Oscillator %D (1 Day): 49.29
  • Stochastic Oscillator %D (5 Day): 65.26
  • Stochastic Oscillator %K (1 Day): 48.28
  • Stochastic Oscillator %K (5 Day): 61.89

Fact Sheet

Fact sheets are issued by the ETF provider and framed by ETFdb.com. Information contained within the fact sheet is not guaranteed to be timely or accurate.

Source: LSEG Information Services (US), Inc. (“LSEG”) © LSEG 2016. All rights in the XTF data, ratings and / or underlying data contained in this communication (“the XTF information”) vest in LSEG and/or its licensors. Neither LSEG nor its licensors accept any liability arising out of the use of, reliance on or any errors or omissions in the XTF information. No further distribution of the XTF information is permitted without LSEG’s express written consent. LSEG does not promote, sponsor or endorse the content of this communication.

Copyright MSCI ESG Research LLC [2018]. All Rights Reserved. MSCI ESG Research LLC’s (“MSCI ESG”) Fund Metrics products (the “Information”) provide environmental, social and governance data with respect to underlying securities within more than 23,000 multi-asset class Mutual Funds and ETFs globally. MSCI ESG is a Registered Investment Adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. MSCI ESG materials have not been submitted, to nor received approval from, the US SEC or any other regulatory body. None of the information constitutes an offer to buy or sell, or a promotion or recommendation of, any security, financial instrument or product or trading strategy, nor should it be taken as an indication or guarantee of any future performance, analysis, forecast or prediction. None of the Information can be used to determine which securities to buy or sell or when to buy or sell them. The Information is provided “as is” and the user of the Information assumes the entire risk of any use it may make or permit to be made of the Information. All Information is provided solely for your internal use, and may not be reproduced or redisseminated in any form without express prior written permission from MSCI. Neither MSCI ESG nor any of its affiliates or any third party involved in or related to creating any Information makes any express or implied warranties, representations or guarantees, and in no event will MSCI ESG or any such affiliate or third party have any liability for any direct, indirect, special, punitive, consequential or any other damages (including lost profits) relating to any Information. More information on MSCI ESG Fund Metrics, provided by MSCI ESG Research LLC, can be found at https://www.msci.com/esg-fund-metrics.
© 2019 Market data provided is at least 15-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions.

Information is provided 'as is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use, please see disclaimer.