Are you getting the best rate from your broker?
Compare your broker's rates now to find out if you can save money

Choose your broker below
Welcome to ETFdb.com. Please help us personalize your experience.

Select the one that best describes you

GBUY
Goldman Sachs New Age Consumer ETF

Price: $91.46
Change: $0.33 (0.0%)
Last Updated:

Vitals

Investment Themes

Trading Data

Open - Volume -
Day Lo - Day Hi -
  • Open
  • Volume
  • Day Lo
  • Day Hi
  • 52 Week Lo $41.33
  • 52 Week Hi $91.56
  • AUM $79.9 M
  • Shares 0.9 M

Analyst Report

Given the name, investors considering the Goldman Sachs New Age Consumer ETF (GBUY) can be forgiven for wondering if their investment comes with cleansing crystals and a Tarot deck (It doesn’t). GBUY tracks a bespoke index that seeks exposure to some familiar segments of the market — like e-commerce, social media, health and wellness, and online games, music and video — as well as a few less familiar concepts like “evolution of education” and “experiences over goods.” Goldman’s own marketing materials describe the investment thesis this way: “We believe that people are best suited to forecast change that is radically different from the past.”

The clearest explanation from Goldman is that GBUY provides “exposure to the beneficiaries of technological innovation, regardless of sector, geography or market capitalization.” The contents of its portfolio provide a bit more clarity, and top holdings include familiar names like Facebook, Amazon, Tencent, Alibaba and Netflix. Investments are selected and weighted “by a function of ‘thematic’ beta.’” GBUY’s management fee isn’t outrageous, but it’s high for the world of indexing, especially when many of the top holdings can be found in other ultra-low-cost vanilla index bunds. This may be why GBUY has been slow to gain assets.

If some of GBUY’s marketing lingo doesn’t sound like the Goldman Sachs you think you know, there’s a good reason. GBUY is one of five ETFs that Goldman launched in 2019 with indexes designed by Motif Investing Inc. The indexes selected stocks using artificial intelligence and machine learning. Goldman worked with Motif to design indexes that aim to identify companies that fit with broad themes that Goldman’s money managers thought would drive growth. (The “Motif” moniker was removed from the fund name in May 2020 when Motif dropped out as the index provider.) The funds were yet another example of Wall Street’s increased use of sophisticated automation. Computers read faster than human analysts, quickly scouring regulatory filings, company reports and news stories for information on a company’s prospects. Using AI and machine learning isn’t that much of a divergence — after all, most factor funds and smart-beta ETFs are really just attempts to codify investing strategies employed by human stock pickers. Whether it’s a plain-vanilla index or something more sophisticated, index methodology is basically just programmed code that tells the index what to buy and sell.

Historical Trading Data

  • 1 Month Avg. Volume 3,267
  • 3 Month Avg. Volume 5,459

Alternative ETFs in the Large Cap Growth Equities Category

Type Symbol Expense Ratio Assets Avg. Daily Vol YTD Return
Cheapest IVV -6.97% $238.4 B 3 M 15.59%
Largest (AUM) SPY 0.09% $327.8 B 78 M 15.59%
Most Liquid (Volume) SPY 0.09% $327.8 B 78 M 15.59%
Top YTD Performer ARKW 0.76% $4.2 B 870,639 133.79%

Top 15 Holdings

Concentration Analysis

This section compares how balanced and deep this ETF is relative to the peer group ETFdb.com Category.

504
Number of Holdings
20.95%
% Assets in Top 10
24.89%
% Assets in Top 15
41.88%
% Assets in Top 50
Number of Holdings
504

% Assets in Top 10
20.95%

% Assets in Top 15
24.89%

% Assets in Top 50
41.88%

Sector Breakdown

Asset Percentage
Common equity 99.99%
ETF Cash Component 0.01%
Sector Percentage
Consumer, Cyclical 43.18%
Other 25.92%
Communications 24.85%
Technology 2.23%
Consumer, Non-Cyclical 2.02%
Healthcare 1.6%
Industrials 0.2%
ETF Cash Component 0.01%
Market Cap Percentage
Large cap 71.71%
Mid cap 17.31%
Small cap 8.92%
Micro cap 2.05%
ETF Cash Component 0.01%
Region Percentage
North America 48.05%
Asia 23.23%
Europe 14.47%
Asia-Pacific 12.45%
Latin America 1.79%
ETF Cash Component 0.01%
Region Percentage
United States 48.05%
Developed Markets (ex-US) 27.04%
Emerging Markets 24.9%
ETF Cash Component 0.01%
Country Percentage
United States 48.05%
China 22.67%
Japan 9.09%
United Kingdom 7.27%
Germany 4.66%
Singapore 2.77%
Luxembourg 1.5%
Argentina 1.11%
France 0.82%
Brazil 0.68%
Hong Kong 0.59%
South Korea 0.35%
India 0.22%
Russia 0.22%
ETF Cash Component 0.01%
Asset Percentage
Common equity 99.99%
ETF Cash Component 0.01%

GBUY Valuation

This section shows how the P/E multiple of this ETF compares to the peer group ETFdb.com Category.

P/E Ratio
37.09

GBUY Dividend

This section shows how the dividend yield of this ETF compares to the peer group ETFdb.com Category.

Dividend
$0.04
Dividend Date
2020-10-29
Annual Dividend Rate
$0.20

$0.04
Dividend
2020-10-29
Dividend Date
$0.20
Annual Dividend Rate
Annual Dividend Yield
0.22%

GBUY Fund Flows

View charts featuring ETF fund flow data.

5 Day Net Flows: -55.87 M 1 Month Net Flows: -338 K 3 Month Net Flows: 11.91 M 6 Month Net Flows: 45.07 M 1 Year Net Flows: 54.76 M 3 Year Net Flows: 54.76 M 5 Year Net Flows: 54.76 M 10 Year Net Flows: 54.76 M

Realtime Rating

The adjacent table gives investors an individual Realtime Rating for GBUY on several different metrics, including liquidity, expenses, performance, volatility, dividend, concentration of holdings in addition to an overall rating. The "A+ Metric Rated ETF" field, available to ETFdb Pro members, shows the ETF in the Large Cap Growth Equities with the highest Metric Realtime Rating for each individual field. To view all of this data, sign up for a free 14-day trial for ETFdb Pro. To view information on how the ETFdb Realtime Ratings work, click here.

Metric Metric Realtime Rating A+ Metric Rated ETF
Liquidity n/a n/a
Expenses n/a n/a
Performance
Volatility
Dividend
Concentration

A+ Overall Rated ETF:

GBUY Expenses & Fees

This section compares the cost efficiency of this ETF to peers in the same ETFdb.com Category.

Expenses Ratio Analysis

ETF Average
0.534%
ETF Wtd. Average
-0.13%
Category Average
0.36%
Expense Ratio
0.50%
ESG Themes and Scores
3.95/10
ESG Score
13.55%
Global Percentile
20.0%
Peer Percentile
    • Revenue Exposure to Environmental Impact (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Severe Environment Controversies (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Sustainable Impact Solutions (%)
      1.95%
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Weighted Average Carbon Intensity (Tons of CO2e / $M Sales)
      23.51
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Fossil Fuel Reserves (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • High Impact Fossil Fuel Reserves (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Water Stress High Risk Business Segment (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Water Stress High Risk Geography (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Water Stress Exposure Moderate (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Water Stress Exposure High (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Water Stress Exposure Low (%)
      Higher improves ESG score
    • Revenue Exposure to Energy Efficiency (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Revenue Exposure to Alternative Energy (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Revenue Exposure to Green Building (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Revenue Exposure to Pollution Prevention (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Revenue Exposure to Water Sustainability (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Revenue Exposure to Social Impact (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Sustainable Impact Solutions (%)
      1.95%
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • SRI Exclusion Criteria (%)
      1.22%
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Revenue Exposure to Affordable Real Estate (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Revenue Exposure to Education (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Revenue Exposure to Major Disease Treatment (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Revenue Exposure to Nutrition (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Revenue Exposure to Sanitation (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Revenue Exposure to SME Finance (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Human Rights Norms Violation (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Human Rights Norms Violation OR Watch List (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Severe Human Rights Controversies (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Labor Norms Violation (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Labor Norms Violation OR Watch List (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Severe Labor Controversies (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Severe Customer Controversies (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Global Compact Compliance Violation (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Global Compact Compliance Violation OR Watch List (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Catholic Values Fail (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Islamic Non-Compliant (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Adult Entertainment Involvement (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Alcohol Involvement (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Gambling Involvement (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Nuclear Power Involvement (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Tobacco Involvement (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Weapons Involvement (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Controversies Weapons Involvement (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Civilian Firearms Involvement (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Civilian Firearms Retailer (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Civilian Firearms Producer (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Direct Predatory Lending Involvement (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Genetic Engineering Involvement (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Severe Governance Controversies (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Board Flag (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Lack of Independent Board Majority (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Board Independence (0-25%) (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Board Independence (25-50%) (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Board Independence (50-75%) (%)
      Higher improves ESG score
    • Board Independence (75-100%) (%)
      Higher improves ESG score
    • No Female Directors (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Three OR More Female Directors (%)
      Higher improves ESG score
    • Females Represent 30% of Directors (%)
      Higher improves ESG score
    • Entrenched Board (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Overboarding (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Negative Director Votes (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Ownership AND Control Flag (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • One Share One Vote (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • No Annual Director Elections (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Does Not Use Majority Voting (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Significant Votes Against Pay Practices (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Controlling Shareholder (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Controlling Shareholder Concerns (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Cross Shareholdings (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Poison Pill (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Pay Flag (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • No Pay Performance Link (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Lack of Internal Pay Equity (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Executive Pay Non-Disclosure (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Accounting Flag (%)
      Lower improves ESG score

GBUY Performance

This section shows how this ETF has performed relative to its peer group ETFdb.com Category.

8.63%
1 Week Return
5.28%
4 Week Return
14.89%
13 Week Return
52.46%
26 Week Return
57.76%
Year to Date Return
68.70%
1 Year Return
No Ranking Available
3 Year Return
No Ranking Available
5 Year Return
1 Week Return
8.63%

4 Week Return
5.28%

13 Week Return
14.89%

26 Week Return
52.46%

Year to Date Return
57.76%

1 Year Return
68.70%

3 Year Return
No Ranking Available

5 Year Return
No Ranking Available

GBUY Price and Volume Chart

GBUY Technicals

Volatility Analysis

This section shows how the volatility of this ETF compares to the peer group ETFdb.com Category.

5 Day Volatility
67.60%
Rank
141 of 235

20 Day Volatility
22.90%
Rank
37 of 235

50 Day Volatility
23.91%
Rank
40 of 231

200 Day Volatility
22.09%
Rank
55 of 221

Beta
1.1
Rank
41 of 230

Standard Deviation
12.59%
Rank
39 of 197

Technicals

  • 20 Day MA $87.09
  • 60 Day MA $83.58
  • MACD 15 Period 4.57
  • MACD 100 Period 11.57
  • Williams % Range 10 Day 1.25
  • Williams % Range 20 Day 1.25
  • RSI 10 Day 71
  • RSI 20 Day 65
  • RSI 30 Day 64
  • Ultimate Oscillator 69

Bollinger Brands

  • Lower Bollinger (10 Day) $82.17
  • Upper Bollinger (10 Day) $91.72
  • Lower Bollinger (20 Day) $83.51
  • Upper Bollinger (20 Day) $90.58
  • Lower Bollinger (30 Day) $81.44
  • Upper Bollinger (30 Day) $90.51

Support & Resistance

  • Support Level 1 $91.17
  • Support Level 2 $90.87
  • Resistance Level 1 $91.66
  • Resistance Level 2 $91.85

Stochastic

  • Stochastic Oscillator %D (1 Day) 73.83
  • Stochastic Oscillator %D (5 Day) 83.35
  • Stochastic Oscillator %K (1 Day) 66.46
  • Stochastic Oscillator %K (5 Day) 67.44

Fact Sheet

A fact sheet is not available for this ETF. Please visit the GBUY ETF home page for more information.

Disclosures

Copyright © 2020 FactSet Research Systems Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright MSCI ESG Research LLC [2018]. All Rights Reserved. MSCI ESG Research LLC’s (“MSCI ESG”) Fund Metrics products (the “Information”) provide environmental, social and governance data with respect to underlying securities within more than 23,000 multi-asset class Mutual Funds and ETFs globally. MSCI ESG is a Registered Investment Adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. MSCI ESG materials have not been submitted, to nor received approval from, the US SEC or any other regulatory body. None of the information constitutes an offer to buy or sell, or a promotion or recommendation of, any security, financial instrument or product or trading strategy, nor should it be taken as an indication or guarantee of any future performance, analysis, forecast or prediction. None of the Information can be used to determine which securities to buy or sell or when to buy or sell them. The Information is provided “as is” and the user of the Information assumes the entire risk of any use it may make or permit to be made of the Information. All Information is provided solely for your internal use, and may not be reproduced or redisseminated in any form without express prior written permission from MSCI. Neither MSCI ESG nor any of its affiliates or any third party involved in or related to creating any Information makes any express or implied warranties, representations or guarantees, and in no event will MSCI ESG or any such affiliate or third party have any liability for any direct, indirect, special, punitive, consequential or any other damages (including lost profits) relating to any Information. More information on MSCI ESG Fund Metrics, provided by MSCI ESG Research LLC, can be found at https://www.msci.com/esg-fund-metrics.
© 2020 Market data provided is at least 15-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions.

Information is provided 'as is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use, please see disclaimer.