Are you getting the best rate from your broker?
Compare your broker's rates now to find out if you can save money

Choose your broker below
Welcome to ETFdb.com. Please help us personalize your experience.

Select the one that best describes you
Etfdb logo
  • ETF
  • HAP
    Pricing Data
    $36.62
    Change: $0.03 (-0.0%)
    Time: 07/15/19
    Previous Close: $36.65
  • Category
  • Large Cap Blend Equities
  • ESG Score
Last Updated:

Profile

Vitals

Trading Data

Open: - Volume -
Day Lo - Day Hi -
  • 52 Week Lo: $30.67
  • 52 Week Hi: $37.17
  • AUM: $73.4 M
  • Shares: 2.0 M

Investment Themes

Historical Trading Data

  • 1 Month Avg. Volume: 5,505
  • 3 Month Avg. Volume: 5,833

Alternative ETFs in the Large Cap Blend Equities Category

Type Ticker Expense Ratio Assets Avg. Daily Vol YTD Return
Cheapest VTV 0.04% $49,698.3 M 1,230,067 16.82%
Largest (AUM) VTV 0.04% $49,698.3 M 1,230,067 16.82%
Most Liquid (Volume) SCHF 0.06% $18,446.2 M 2,379,614 14.17%
Top YTD Performer VETS 0.60% $3.0 M 488 26.54%

Analyst Report

This ETF gives investors exposure to hard-assets producers, and its portfolio of developed-market equities is heavily concentrated in basic materials, with an emphasis on energy. The fund holds primarily giant and large-cap companies, which additionally improve the risk-adjusted returns gained from commodities exposure. HAP is a nice option for investors looking to bet on increasing demand for raw materials as the global economic recovery picks up speed.

Realtime Rating

Sign Up for Pro to Unlock Data Sign Up

Realtime Rating Summary

The adjacent table gives investors an individual Realtime Rating for HAP on several different metrics, including liquidity, expenses, performance, volatility, dividend, concentration of holdings in addition to an overall rating. The "A+ Metric Rated ETF" field, available to ETFdb Pro members, shows the ETF in the Large Cap Blend Equities with the highest Metric Realtime Rating for each individual field. To view all of this data, sign up for a free 14-day trial for ETFdb Pro. To view information on how the ETFdb Realtime Ratings work, click here.

Compare to another ETF

View the Category Report

HAP Overall Realtime Rating:

A+ Overall Rated ETF:

Metric Metric Realtime Rating A+ Metric Rated ETF
Liquidity B+ n/a
Expenses A- n/a
Performance
Volatility
Dividend
Concentration

HAP In-Depth Analysis

The following tables and charts contain in-depth metrics for this ETF and compare it to similar peer ETFs within its ETFdb.com Category.

HAP Holdings

Filings Data as of: Jul 12, 2019

Concentration Analysis

This section compares how balanced and deep this ETF is relative to the peer group ETFdb.com Category.

Number of Holdings
Rank: 36 of 130
301
Category Low RWVG (2)
Category High FNDB (1531)
% Assets in Top 10
Rank: 96 of 130
32.76%
Category Low PQLC (4.44%)
Category High DFND (147.17%)
% Assets in Top 15
Rank: 40 of 130
40.30%
Category Low JPGE (6.07%)
Category High DFND (153.28%)
% Assets in Top 50
Rank: 69 of 130
65.88%
Category Low JPGE (16.84%)
Category High DFND (190.04%)

Asset Allocation

Asset Percentage
Common equity 99.9%
Preferred stock 0.1%

Sector Breakdown

Sector Percentage
Energy 29.98%
Basic Materials 28.87%
Consumer, Non-Cyclical 16.16%
Industrials 13.08%
Other 4.97%
Utilities 3.57%
Consumer, Cyclical 2.01%
Real Estate 0.63%
Financials 0.38%
Technology 0.36%

Market Cap Breakdown

Market Cap Percentage
Large cap 73.93%
Mid cap 21.01%
Small cap 4.11%
Micro cap 0.81%
Unknown 0.14%

Region Breakdown

Region Percentage
North America 54.04%
Europe 22.39%
Asia-Pacific 12.78%
Asia 5.77%
Latin America 3.57%
Africa 1.09%
Other 0.32%
Middle East 0.04%

Market Tier Breakdown

Region Percentage
United States 43.73%
Developed Markets (ex-US) 43.39%
Emerging Markets 12.11%
Not-designated 0.5%
Frontier Markets 0.27%

Country Breakdown

Country Percentage
United States 43.73%
Canada 10.32%
United Kingdom 7.06%
Japan 6.06%
Australia 5.42%
Norway 3.01%
Russia 2.44%
France 2.2%
Brazil 2.12%
Netherlands 1.96%
China 1.86%
Malaysia 1.45%
Singapore 1.16%
Germany 1.1%
South Africa 1.09%
South Korea 0.93%
India 0.8%
Mexico 0.71%
Sweden 0.58%
Italy 0.52%
Chile 0.51%
Denmark 0.48%
Switzerland 0.47%
Spain 0.38%
Finland 0.38%
Ireland 0.34%
Taiwan 0.33%
Thailand 0.32%
Faeroe Islands 0.32%
Poland 0.28%
Luxembourg 0.27%
Austria 0.27%
Cyprus 0.27%
Portugal 0.15%
Peru 0.14%
Liechtenstein 0.1%
Argentina 0.09%
Papua New Guinea 0.08%
Turkey 0.08%
Indonesia 0.08%
Hungary 0.06%
Hong Kong 0.06%
Saudi Arabia 0.04%

HAP Expenses & Fees

This section compares the cost efficiency of this ETF to peers in the same ETFdb.com Category.

Expenses Ratio Analysis

ETF Average
0.544%
ETF Wtd. Average
0.20%
Category Average
0.46%
Expense Ratio
Rank: 82 of 133
0.50%
Category Low IUSV (0.04%)
Category High TERM (1.50%)

Commission Free Trading

This ETF is not currently available for commission free trading on any platforms.

Category Commission Free Trading

There are 6 other ETFs in the Large Cap Blend Equities ETFdb.com Category that are also eligible for commission free trading:

HAP ESG Themes and Scores
  • 5.6/10
    ESG Score
  • 56.15%
    ESG Score Global Percentile (%)
  • 62.94%
    ESG Score Peer Percentile (%)
    • Revenue Exposure to Environmental Impact (%)

      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Severe Environment Controversies (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Sustainable Impact Solutions (%)
      7.28%

      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Weighted Average Carbon Intensity (Tons of CO2e / $M Sales)
      591.11

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Fossil Fuel Reserves (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • High Impact Fossil Fuel Reserves (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Water Stress High Risk Business Segment (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Water Stress High Risk Geography (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Water Stress Exposure Moderate (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Water Stress Exposure High (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Water Stress Exposure Low (%)

      Higher improves ESG score
    • Revenue Exposure to Energy Efficiency (%)

      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Revenue Exposure to Alternative Energy (%)

      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Revenue Exposure to Green Building (%)

      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Revenue Exposure to Pollution Prevention (%)

      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Revenue Exposure to Water Sustainability (%)

      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Revenue Exposure to Social Impact (%)

      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Sustainable Impact Solutions (%)
      7.28%

      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • SRI Exclusion Criteria (%)
      6.04%

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Revenue Exposure to Affordable Real Estate (%)

      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Revenue Exposure to Education (%)

      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Revenue Exposure to Major Disease Treatment (%)

      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Revenue Exposure to Nutrition (%)

      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Revenue Exposure to Sanitation (%)

      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Revenue Exposure to SME Finance (%)

      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Human Rights Norms Violation (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Human Rights Norms Violation OR Watch List (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Severe Human Rights Controversies (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Labor Norms Violation (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Labor Norms Violation OR Watch List (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Severe Labor Controversies (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Severe Customer Controversies (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Global Compact Compliance Violation (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Global Compact Compliance Violation OR Watch List (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Catholic Values Fail (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Islamic Non-Compliant (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Adult Entertainment Involvement (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Alcohol Involvement (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Gambling Involvement (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Nuclear Power Involvement (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Tobacco Involvement (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Weapons Involvement (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Controversies Weapons Involvement (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Civilian Firearms Involvement (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Civilian Firearms Retailer (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Civilian Firearms Producer (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Direct Predatory Lending Involvement (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Genetic Engineering Involvement (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Severe Governance Controversies (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Board Flag (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Lack of Independent Board Majority (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Board Independence (0-25%) (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Board Independence (25-50%) (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Board Independence (50-75%) (%)

      Higher improves ESG score
    • Board Independence (75-100%) (%)

      Higher improves ESG score
    • No Female Directors (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Three OR More Female Directors (%)

      Higher improves ESG score
    • Females Represent 30% of Directors (%)

      Higher improves ESG score
    • Entrenched Board (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Overboarding (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Negative Director Votes (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Ownership AND Control Flag (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • One Share One Vote (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • No Annual Director Elections (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Does Not Use Majority Voting (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Significant Votes Against Pay Practices (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Controlling Shareholder (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Controlling Shareholder Concerns (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Cross Shareholdings (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Poison Pill (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Pay Flag (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • No Pay Performance Link (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Lack of Internal Pay Equity (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Executive Pay Non-Disclosure (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Accounting Flag (%)

      Lower improves ESG score

HAP Performance

This section shows how this ETF has performed relative to its peer group ETFdb.com Category.

1 Week Return
Rank: 110 of 133
0.38%
Category Low PID (-0.55%)
Category High PTNQ (2.21%)
4 Week Return
Rank: 45 of 133
4.08%
Category Low UJUN (1.67%)
Category High KARS (7.81%)
13 Week Return
Rank: 98 of 126
0.67%
Category Low EKAR (-7.29%)
Category High VETS (8.12%)
26 Week Return
Rank: 109 of 123
8.32%
Category Low TERM (-2.91%)
Category High VETS (26.54%)
Year to Date Return
Rank: 103 of 122
13.64%
Category Low TERM (-9.45%)
Category High VETS (26.54%)
1 Year Return
Rank: 83 of 115
2.46%
Category Low TERM (-19.32%)
Category High LVHB (18.83%)
3 Year Return
Rank: 60 of 73
23.10%
Category Low FCAN (6.86%)
Category High PTNQ (72.58%)
5 Year Return
Rank: 54 of 57
2.40%
Category Low FCAN (-33.08%)
Category High FVD (68.06%)

HAP Fund Flows

This section compares the fund flows of this ETF to peers in the same ETFdb.com Category.

1 Week Fund Flow
Rank: N/A
No Ranking Available
Category Low PRF (‑$112.3 M)
Category High IWD ($128.5 M)
4 Week Fund Flow
Rank: N/A
No Ranking Available
Category Low PRF (‑$112.3 M)
Category High VYM ($413.6 M)
13 Week Fund Flow
Rank: 79 of 109
‑$1.8 M
Category Low IVE (‑$253.0 M)
Category High VYM ($1,146.8 M)
26 Week Fund Flow
Rank: 107 of 123
‑$14.0 M
Category Low IWD (‑$3,012.0 M)
Category High FVD ($1,413.8 M)
Year to Date Fund Flow
Rank: 103 of 124
‑$14.0 M
Category Low IWD (‑$3,784.4 M)
Category High VTV ($1,692.5 M)
1 Year Fund Flow
Rank: 115 of 128
‑$24.9 M
Category Low PWV (‑$381.2 M)
Category High VTV ($6,720.3 M)
3 Year Fund Flow
Rank: 121 of 130
‑$32.4 M
Category Low FEX (‑$509.0 M)
Category High VTV ($18,472.2 M)
5 Year Fund Flow
Rank: 119 of 130
‑$26.5 M
Category Low MOO (‑$1,657.2 M)
Category High VTV ($24,717.4 M)

Brought to You by ETF Flows


Charts

The following charts can be customized to display historical performance in a number of different formats, including line charts, bar charts, and candlesticks. Time periods can be adjusted to increase or decrease the period shown, ranging from five minutes to several months.

The following chart also includes the option to compare the performance of HAP relative to other ETFs and benchmarks or to include indicators such as Bollinger Bands, relative strength, and moving averages.

HAP Valuation

This section shows how the P/E multiple of this ETF compares to the peer group ETFdb.com Category.

P/E Ratio
Rank: 60 of 126
15.57
Category Low WBIF (-9899.0)
Category High PQLC (23.1)

HAP Dividend

This section shows how the dividend yield of this ETF compares to the peer group ETFdb.com Category.

Dividend
$0.92
Dividend Date
2018-12-20
Annual Dividend Rate
$0.92
Annual Dividend Yield
Rank: 54 of 127
2.51%
Category Low TPHD (0.27%)
Category High ESGS (6.71%)

HAP Technicals

Volatility Analysis

This section shows how the volatility of this ETF compares to the peer group ETFdb.com Category.

5 Day Volatility
Rank: 41 of 131
76.41%
Category Low PJUN (1.36%)
Category High TLTE (134.56%)
20 Day Volatility
Rank: 37 of 133
8.78%
Category Low UJUN (2.66%)
Category High DWCR (20.54%)
50 Day Volatility
Rank: 39 of 128
12.97%
Category Low QGTA (7.78%)
Category High VETS (29.58%)
200 Day Volatility
Rank: 39 of 126
11.83%
Category Low QGTA (6.70%)
Category High VETS (23.80%)
Beta
Rank: 77 of 127
0.88
Category Low DFND (0.48)
Category High RWIU (1.3)
Standard Deviation
Rank: 67 of 112
1.24%
Category Low LVL (0.49%)
Category High IWD (4.57%)

Technicals

  • 20 Day MA: $36.41
  • 60 Day MA: $35.38
  • MACD 15 Period: 0.06
  • MACD 100 Period: 1.07
  • Williams % Range 10 Day: 48.01
  • Williams % Range 20 Day: 20.74
  • RSI 10 Day: 63
  • RSI 20 Day: 61
  • RSI 30 Day: 59
  • Ultimate Oscillator: 57

Bollinger Brands

  • Lower Bollinger (10 Day): $36.28
  • Upper Bollinger (10 Day): $36.86
  • Lower Bollinger (20 Day): $35.66
  • Upper Bollinger (20 Day): $37.15
  • Lower Bollinger (30 Day): $34.16
  • Upper Bollinger (30 Day): $37.58

Support & Resistance

  • Support Level 1: $36.61
  • Support Level 2: $36.60
  • Resistance Level 1: $36.64
  • Resistance Level 2: $36.66

Stochastic

  • Stochastic Oscillator %D (1 Day): 38.03
  • Stochastic Oscillator %D (5 Day): 70.28
  • Stochastic Oscillator %K (1 Day): 55.27
  • Stochastic Oscillator %K (5 Day): 57.07

Fact Sheet

Fact sheets are issued by the ETF provider and framed by ETFdb.com. Information contained within the fact sheet is not guaranteed to be timely or accurate.

Source: LSEG Information Services (US), Inc. (“LSEG”) © LSEG 2016. All rights in the XTF data, ratings and / or underlying data contained in this communication (“the XTF information”) vest in LSEG and/or its licensors. Neither LSEG nor its licensors accept any liability arising out of the use of, reliance on or any errors or omissions in the XTF information. No further distribution of the XTF information is permitted without LSEG’s express written consent. LSEG does not promote, sponsor or endorse the content of this communication.

Copyright MSCI ESG Research LLC [2018]. All Rights Reserved. MSCI ESG Research LLC’s (“MSCI ESG”) Fund Metrics products (the “Information”) provide environmental, social and governance data with respect to underlying securities within more than 23,000 multi-asset class Mutual Funds and ETFs globally. MSCI ESG is a Registered Investment Adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. MSCI ESG materials have not been submitted, to nor received approval from, the US SEC or any other regulatory body. None of the information constitutes an offer to buy or sell, or a promotion or recommendation of, any security, financial instrument or product or trading strategy, nor should it be taken as an indication or guarantee of any future performance, analysis, forecast or prediction. None of the Information can be used to determine which securities to buy or sell or when to buy or sell them. The Information is provided “as is” and the user of the Information assumes the entire risk of any use it may make or permit to be made of the Information. All Information is provided solely for your internal use, and may not be reproduced or redisseminated in any form without express prior written permission from MSCI. Neither MSCI ESG nor any of its affiliates or any third party involved in or related to creating any Information makes any express or implied warranties, representations or guarantees, and in no event will MSCI ESG or any such affiliate or third party have any liability for any direct, indirect, special, punitive, consequential or any other damages (including lost profits) relating to any Information. More information on MSCI ESG Fund Metrics, provided by MSCI ESG Research LLC, can be found at https://www.msci.com/esg-fund-metrics.
© 2019 Market data provided is at least 15-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions.

Information is provided 'as is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use, please see disclaimer.