Financial Services ETFs invest in stocks of companies that provide financial services, including deposit-taking, loan and investment services, money management, insurance, mortgages, and money transfers.
Financial Services ETFs invest in stocks of companies that provide financial services, including deposit-taking, loan and investment services, money management, insurance, mortgages, and money transfers.
Click on the tabs below to see more information on Financial Services ETFs, including historical performance, dividends, holdings, expense ratios, technical indicators, analysts reports and more. Click on an ETF ticker or name to go to its detail page, for in-depth news, financial data and graphs. By default the list is ordered by descending total market capitalization. Note that ETFs are usually tagged by ETF Database analysts as more than one type; for example, an inverse gold ETF may be tagged as “inverse” and as “gold” and as “commodity”.
Note that the table below may include leveraged and inverse ETFs. Exclude Leveraged and Inverse ETFs
As of 04/30/2025
This is a list of all Financial Services ETFs traded in the USA which are currently tagged by ETF Database. Please note that the list may not contain newly issued ETFs. If you’re looking for a more simplified way to browse and compare ETFs, you may want to visit our ETF Database Categories, which categorize every ETF in a single “best fit” category.
* Assets and Average Volume as of 2025-04-30 5:48 EDT
This page includes historical return information for all Financial Services ETFs listed on U.S. exchanges that are currently tracked by ETF Database.
The table below includes fund flow data for all U.S. listed Financial Services ETFs. Total fund flow is the capital inflow into an ETF minus the capital outflow from the ETF for a particular time period.
Fund Flows in millions of U.S. Dollars.
The following table includes expense data and other descriptive information for all Financial Services ETFs listed on U.S. exchanges that are currently tracked by ETF Database. In addition to expense ratio and issuer information, this table displays platforms that offer commission-free trading for certain ETFs.
Clicking on any of the links in the table below will provide additional descriptive and quantitative information on Financial Services ETFs.
The following table includes ESG Scores and other descriptive information for all Financial Services ETFs listed on U.S. exchanges that are currently tracked by ETF Database. Easily browse and evaluate ETFs by visiting our ESG Investing themes section and find ETFs that map to various environmental, social, governance and morality themes.
This page includes historical dividend information for all Financial Services ETFs listed on U.S. exchanges that are currently tracked by ETF Database. Note that certain ETPs may not make dividend payments, and as such some of the information below may not be meaningful.
The table below includes basic holdings data for all U.S. listed Financial Services ETFs that are currently tagged by ETF Database. The table below includes the number of holdings for each ETF and the percentage of assets that the top ten assets make up, if applicable. For more detailed holdings information for any ETF, click on the link in the right column.
The following table includes certain tax information for all Financial Services ETFs listed on U.S. exchanges that are currently tracked by ETF Database, including applicable short-term and long-term capital gains rates and the tax form on which gains or losses in each ETF will be reported.
This page contains certain technical information for all Financial Services ETFs that are listed on U.S. exchanges and tracked by ETF Database. Note that the table below only includes limited technical indicators; click on the “View” link in the far right column for each ETF to see an expanded display of the product’s technicals.
This page provides links to various analysis for all Financial Services ETFs that are listed on U.S. exchanges and tracked by ETF Database. The links in the table below will guide you to various analytical resources for the relevant ETF, including an X-ray of holdings, official fund fact sheet, or objective analyst report.
This page provides ETF Database Ratings for all Financial Services ETFs that are listed on U.S. exchanges and tracked by ETF Database. The ETF Database Ratings are transparent, quant-based evaluations of ETFs relative to other products in the same ETF Database Category. As such, it should be noted that this page may include ETFs from multiple ETF Database Categories.
Symbol Symbol | ETF Name ETF Name | Asset Class Asset Class | Sector Sector | Total Assets ($MM) Total Assets ($MM) | YTD YTD | Avg Volume Avg Volume | Previous Closing Price Previous Closing Price | 1-Day Change 1-Day Change | 1 Week 1 Week | 1 Month 1 Month | 1 Year 1 Year | 3 Year 3 Year | 5 Year 5 Year | YTD FF YTD FF | 1 Week FF 1 Week FF | 4 Week FF 4 Week FF | 1 Year FF 1 Year FF | 3 Year FF 3 Year FF | 5 Year FF 5 Year FF | ETF Database Category ETF Database Category | Inception Inception | ER ER | Commission Free Commission Free | Annual Dividend Rate Annual Dividend Rate | Dividend Date Dividend Date | Dividend Dividend | Annual Dividend Yield % Annual Dividend Yield % | P/E Ratio P/E Ratio | Beta Beta | # of Holdings # of Holdings | % In Top 10 % In Top 10 | Complete Complete | ST Cap Gain Rate ST Cap Gain Rate | LT Cap Gain Rate LT Cap Gain Rate | Tax Form Tax Form | Lower Bollinger Lower Bollinger | Upper Bollinger Upper Bollinger | Support 1 Support 1 | Resistance 1 Resistance 1 | RSI RSI | Advanced Advanced | Fact Sheet Fact Sheet | ETF Holdings ETF Holdings | Chart Chart | ETF Home Page ETF Home Page | Head-To-Head Head-To-Head | Overall Rating Overall Rating | Liquidity Rating Liquidity Rating | Expenses Rating Expenses Rating | Returns Rating Returns Rating | Volatility Rating Volatility Rating | Dividend Rating Dividend Rating | Concentration Rating Concentration Rating |
ESG Score
ESG Score
|
ESG Score Peer Percentile (%)
ESG Score Peer Percentile (%)
|
ESG Score Global Percentile (%)
ESG Score Global Percentile (%)
|
Carbon Intensity (Tons of CO2e / $M Sales)
Carbon Intensity (Tons of CO2e / $M Sales)
|
SRI Exclusion Criteria (%)
SRI Exclusion Criteria (%)
|
Sustainable Impact Solutions (%)
Sustainable Impact Solutions (%)
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAS | Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares | Equity | Financials | $2,173.86 | -23.54% | 876,149 | $115.11 | -6.49% | -9.59% | -26.21% | 18.61% | 2.48% | 36.31% | Leveraged Equities | 2008-11-06 | 0.89% | N/A | $1.23 | 2025-03-25 | $0.46 | 0.89% | 0.06 | 3.10 | 75 | 68.16% | View | 40% | 20% | 1099 | $95.01 | $177.26 | $110.08 | $121.07 | 38.70 | View | View | View | View | View | View | A- | A | 6.14 | 36.93% | 39.19% | 23.33 | 8.19% | 0.09% | |||||||||||
IYG | iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF | Equity | Financials | $1,612.10 | -7.23% | 130,125 | $71.99 | -2.15% | -2.85% | -8.05% | 14.95% | 8.55% | 16.72% | Financials Equities | 2000-06-12 | 0.39% | N/A | $0.92 | 2025-03-18 | $0.21 | 1.18% | 13.60 | 1.16 | 104 | 63.40% | View | 40% | 20% | 1099 | $67.74 | $82.30 | $71.10 | $73.03 | 41.43 | View | View | View | View | View | View | A- | B+ | 6.17 | 28.21% | 39.98% | 27.04 | 14.52% | 0.27% | |||||||||||
FINX | Global X FinTech ETF | Equity | Financials | $260.81 | -16.24% | 74,871 | $26.15 | -2.10% | -3.00% | -9.04% | 5.46% | -3.60% | 1.00% | Technology Equities | 2016-09-12 | 0.68% | N/A | $0.22 | 2024-12-30 | $0.17 | 0.79% | 26.95 | 1.35 | 63 | 53.48% | View | 40% | 20% | 1099 | $24.34 | $29.74 | $25.80 | $26.58 | 41.55 | View | View | View | View | View | View | A- | B- | 5.74 | 30.29% | 30.99% | 43.39 | 0.30% | 0.57% | |||||||||||
FAZ | Direxion Daily Financial Bear 3X Shares | Equity | Financials | $104.94 | 7.57% | 29,634,514 | $6.73 | 6.49% | 10.33% | 16.73% | -36.72% | -26.94% | -49.39% | Inverse Equities | 2008-11-06 | 1.04% | N/A | $0.39 | 2025-03-25 | $0.10 | 7.09% | 0.00 | -2.64 | 1 | 100.00% | View | 40% | 20% | 1099 | $4.84 | $7.69 | $6.42 | $6.99 | 55.41 | View | View | View | View | View | View | A- | C+ | 5.5 | 48.28% | 27.70% | 1.57 | 0.00% | 0.00% | |||||||||||
Click Here to Join to ETF Database Pro for 14 Days Free, Export This Data & So Much More |
Industry power rankings are rankings between Financial Services and all other industry U.S.-listed ETFs on certain investment-related metrics, including 3-month fund flows, 3-month return, AUM, average ETF expenses and average dividend yields. The metric calculations are based on U.S.-listed ETFs that are classified by ETF Database as being mostly exposed to a specific industry. If an ETF changes its industry classification, it will also be reflected in the investment metric calculations. The calculations exclude inverse ETFs.
Financial Services and all other industries are ranked based on their aggregate 3-month fund flows for all U.S.-listed ETFs that are classified by ETF Database as being mostly exposed to those respective industries. 3-month fund flows is a metric that can be used to gauge the perceived popularity amongst investors of Financial Services relative to other industries. If an ETF’s industry classification changes, it will affect the fund flow calculations. The calculations exclude inverse ETFs. All values are in U.S. dollars.
Financial Services and all other industries are ranked based on their AUM-weighted average 3-month return for all the U.S.-listed ETFs that are classified by ETF Database as being mostly exposed to those respective industries. In addition to price performance, the 3-month return assumes the reinvestment of all dividends during the last 3 months. If an ETF’s industry classification changes, it will affect the 3-month return calculations. The calculations exclude inverse ETFs.
Financial Services and all other industries are ranked based on their aggregate assets under management (AUM) for all the U.S.-listed ETFs that are classified by ETF Database as being mostly exposed to those respective industries. If an ETF’s industry classification changes, it will affect the aggregate AUM calculations. The calculations exclude inverse ETFs. All values are in U.S. dollars.
Financial Services and all other industries are ranked based on their AUM-weighted average expense ratios for all the U.S.-listed ETFs that are classified by ETF Database as being mostly exposed to those respective industries. The lower the average expense ratio for all U.S.-listed ETFs in an industry, the higher the rank. If an ETF’s industry classification changes, it will affect the expense ratio calculations. The calculations exclude inverse ETFs.
Financial Services and all other industries are ranked based on their AUM-weighted average dividend yield for all the U.S.-listed ETFs that are classified by ETF Database as being mostly exposed to those respective industries. If an ETF’s industry classification changes, it will affect the dividend yield calculations. The calculations exclude inverse ETFs.
Industry Industry | Fund Flow Rank Fund Flow Rank |
+/- |
3-Month Fund Flow ($MM) 3-Month Fund Flow ($MM) | Return Rank Return Rank |
+/- |
Avg. 3-Month Return (%) Avg. 3-Month Return (%) | AUM Rank AUM Rank |
+/- |
Assets Under Management ($MM) Assets Under Management ($MM) | Expense Rank Expense Rank |
+/- |
Avg. Expense Ratio (%) Avg. Expense Ratio (%) | Dividend Rank Dividend Rank |
+/- |
Avg. Dividend Yield (%) Avg. Dividend Yield (%) | # of ETFs # of ETFs |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Semiconductors | 1 | 1 | 77 | 1 | 5 | - | 41 | - | 46 | 1 | 16 | |||||
Automotive | 2 | 1 | 79 | 1 | 27 | 1 | 76 | - | 6 | - | 10 | |||||
Broad Technology | 3 | 2 | 60 | 4 | 1 | - | 10 | - | 67 | 1 | 90 | |||||
Broad Utilities | 4 | - | 15 | 1 | 8 | - | 6 | 1 | 19 | 1 | 14 | |||||
Software | 5 | - | 55 | 4 | 18 | - | 33 | - | 74 | 1 | 9 | |||||
MLP | 6 | 2 | 23 | 2 | 14 | - | 73 | - | 7 | - | 12 | |||||
Internet Architecture | 7 | - | 24 | 1 | 20 | - | 49 | - | 73 | 1 | 3 | |||||
Cryptocurrency | 8 | 1 | 78 | 1 | 43 | 3 | 74 | - | 68 | 1 | 9 | |||||
Media | 9 | 1 | 35 | 5 | 12 | - | 1 | - | 54 | 1 | 5 | |||||
Broad Financials | 10 | 4 | 28 | 1 | 2 | - | 9 | - | 37 | 1 | 23 | |||||
Consumer Goods | 11 | 4 | 3 | - | 42 | - | 23 | 1 | 28 | 1 | 1 | |||||
Silver Miners | 12 | 1 | 2 | - | 33 | 1 | 63 | 2 | 16 | 1 | 5 | |||||
Business Development Company | 13 | 1 | 43 | - | 41 | - | 78 | - | 4 | - | 4 | |||||
Pharmaceutical | 14 | 8 | 18 | 2 | 40 | - | 26 | - | 38 | 1 | 7 | |||||
Nuclear Energy | 15 | 4 | 58 | 5 | 48 | - | 59 | - | 63 | - | 1 | |||||
Leisure & Entertainment | 16 | 2 | 48 | 2 | 61 | - | 55 | 1 | 62 | - | 6 | |||||
Internet Infrastructure | 17 | 1 | 70 | 1 | 58 | - | 40 | - | 21 | 2 | 4 | |||||
Social Media | 18 | 3 | 68 | - | 59 | - | 75 | - | 1 | - | 8 | |||||
Mortgage REITs | 19 | 5 | 41 | 4 | 50 | 1 | 34 | - | 3 | - | 7 | |||||
Manufacturing | 20 | 6 | 59 | 2 | 70 | - | 71 | - | 72 | 1 | 2 | |||||
Food & Beverage | 21 | 6 | 9 | 2 | 67 | - | 60 | - | 40 | 2 | 4 | |||||
Hard Assets Producers | 22 | 6 | 13 | - | 66 | - | 29 | 1 | 25 | 1 | 1 | |||||
Aerospace & Defense | 23 | 6 | 12 | 4 | 16 | 1 | 35 | - | 64 | - | 8 | |||||
Environmental Services | 24 | 5 | 21 | 2 | 72 | - | 46 | 1 | 75 | 5 | 1 | |||||
Shipping | 25 | 5 | 29 | 11 | 74 | - | 66 | 1 | 2 | - | 3 | |||||
Nanotechnology | 26 | 5 | 74 | 1 | 78 | - | 50 | - | 77 | - | 1 | |||||
Global Warming | 27 | 5 | 34 | 2 | 77 | - | 39 | - | 43 | 1 | 1 | |||||
Commodity Producers | 28 | - | 8 | - | 79 | - | 79 | - | 79 | - | 1 | |||||
Networking | 29 | 4 | 44 | 2 | 75 | - | 21 | - | 47 | - | 1 | |||||
Residential Real Estate | 30 | 6 | 7 | - | 51 | 1 | 38 | - | 30 | - | 1 | |||||
Steel | 31 | 3 | 27 | 1 | 73 | - | 48 | 1 | 15 | 2 | 1 | |||||
YieldCos | 32 | 3 | 10 | 2 | 76 | - | 64 | 1 | 44 | - | 1 | |||||
Industrial/Office Real Estate | 33 | 5 | 14 | 1 | 68 | - | 44 | - | 20 | 2 | 1 | |||||
Community Banks | 34 | 7 | 51 | 3 | 71 | - | 54 | 2 | 23 | - | 1 | |||||
Wind Energy | 35 | 5 | 6 | - | 69 | - | 57 | 1 | 45 | 1 | 2 | |||||
Cleantech | 36 | 3 | 42 | 1 | 65 | - | 61 | 1 | 53 | 1 | 4 | |||||
Gaming | 37 | 5 | 5 | - | 57 | - | 51 | 1 | 66 | 1 | 7 | |||||
Solar Energy | 38 | 8 | 56 | 3 | 54 | 1 | 69 | 1 | 55 | - | 3 | |||||
Retail | 39 | 2 | 64 | 1 | 47 | - | 45 | 3 | 31 | 2 | 12 | |||||
Agribusiness | 40 | 4 | 16 | 1 | 56 | - | 42 | - | 17 | 1 | 5 | |||||
Timber | 41 | 4 | 36 | 2 | 63 | - | 37 | - | 29 | 1 | 2 | |||||
Broad Materials | 42 | 23 | 33 | 2 | 19 | - | 12 | - | 33 | 1 | 14 | |||||
Energy Infrastructure | 43 | 23 | 39 | 10 | 32 | 1 | 32 | - | 9 | - | 3 | |||||
Healthcare Services | 44 | 4 | 20 | 11 | 55 | 3 | 19 | - | 65 | 1 | 2 | |||||
Electric Energy Infrastructure | 45 | 22 | 38 | 5 | 38 | - | 47 | 1 | 56 | - | 2 | |||||
Private Equity | 46 | 3 | 47 | - | 64 | - | 77 | - | 5 | - | 2 | |||||
Metals & Mining | 47 | 3 | 40 | 5 | 35 | - | 18 | - | 42 | 1 | 4 | |||||
Cloud Computing | 48 | 23 | 73 | 1 | 30 | 1 | 53 | - | 76 | - | 9 | |||||
Capital Markets | 49 | 2 | 62 | 2 | 60 | - | 13 | - | 35 | - | 1 | |||||
Financial Services | 50 | 4 | 69 | 7 | 29 | 1 | 67 | 1 | 59 | 1 | 4 | |||||
Natural Gas | 51 | - | 71 | 1 | 62 | - | 56 | 1 | 11 | - | 1 | |||||
Insurance | 52 | - | 11 | 1 | 37 | - | 14 | - | 39 | - | 3 | |||||
Lithium | 53 | 2 | 57 | 1 | 49 | - | 70 | - | 51 | 1 | 3 | |||||
Airlines | 54 | 1 | 76 | 1 | 53 | 1 | 58 | 3 | 78 | - | 3 | |||||
Water | 55 | 1 | 26 | 1 | 24 | - | 52 | 1 | 57 | - | 7 | |||||
Transportation | 56 | 1 | 63 | 3 | 52 | 1 | 22 | 1 | 48 | - | 7 | |||||
Broad Energy | 57 | 1 | 49 | 1 | 39 | - | 72 | - | 8 | - | 6 | |||||
Internet | 58 | 44 | 32 | 4 | 15 | 1 | 65 | 2 | 41 | 2 | 16 | |||||
Banks | 59 | 16 | 61 | - | 23 | - | 15 | - | 22 | 1 | 4 | |||||
Broad Telecom | 60 | 2 | 46 | 2 | 22 | - | 8 | - | 50 | - | 9 | |||||
Medical Devices | 61 | 1 | 37 | 1 | 25 | - | 20 | - | 70 | 1 | 3 | |||||
Uranium | 62 | 1 | 67 | 2 | 31 | 2 | 68 | 1 | 14 | - | 2 | |||||
Consumer Services | 63 | 1 | 53 | 3 | 44 | 1 | 17 | - | 69 | - | 1 | |||||
Clean Energy | 64 | 1 | 30 | 4 | 34 | - | 31 | - | 34 | 1 | 14 | |||||
Copper Miners | 65 | 2 | 31 | 8 | 36 | - | 62 | 2 | 36 | 2 | 1 | |||||
Homebuilders | 66 | 7 | 66 | 1 | 28 | 2 | 25 | - | 60 | 1 | 6 | |||||
Natural Resources | 67 | 1 | 19 | 1 | 21 | - | 28 | - | 12 | - | 7 | |||||
Oil Equipment & Services | 68 | - | 75 | 1 | 45 | 1 | 16 | - | 24 | 1 | 4 | |||||
Broad Real Estate | 69 | 1 | 17 | 1 | 3 | - | 5 | 1 | 10 | - | 40 | |||||
Infrastructure | 70 | 3 | 25 | 1 | 13 | - | 30 | 1 | 32 | 1 | 10 | |||||
Broker-Dealers | 71 | 2 | 52 | 3 | 46 | 1 | 24 | 2 | 52 | 1 | 1 | |||||
Biotechnology | 72 | - | 50 | 5 | 17 | - | 36 | - | 71 | 1 | 22 | |||||
Regional Banks | 73 | 1 | 72 | 1 | 26 | 1 | 27 | - | 18 | - | 4 | |||||
Broad Consumer Staples | 74 | 1 | 4 | - | 9 | - | 7 | - | 27 | 1 | 14 | |||||
Broad Industrials | 75 | 4 | 45 | - | 7 | - | 11 | - | 49 | - | 19 | |||||
Broad Healthcare | 76 | 1 | 22 | - | 4 | - | 4 | - | 26 | 14 | 24 | |||||
Broad Consumer Discretionary | 77 | 1 | 65 | 1 | 10 | 1 | 2 | - | 61 | - | 23 | |||||
Gold Miners | 78 | 1 | 1 | - | 11 | 1 | 43 | - | 58 | 2 | 14 | |||||
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | 79 | 1 | 54 | 2 | 6 | - | 3 | - | 13 | 2 | 21 | |||||
Join ETF Database Pro and Export This Data for Free
Signup to Export This Data
|
* Ranks are updated on a weekly basis. Last updated on Apr 28, 2025
ETF issuers who have ETFs with exposure to Financial Services are ranked on certain investment-related metrics, including estimated revenue, 3-month fund flows, 3-month return, AUM, average ETF expenses and average dividend yields. The metric calculations are based on U.S.-listed Financial Services ETFs and every Financial Services ETF has one issuer. If an issuer changes its ETFs, it will also be reflected in the investment metric calculations.
ETF issuers are ranked based on their estimated revenue from their ETFs with exposure to Financial Services. Estimated revenue for an ETF issuer is calculated by aggregating the estimated revenue of the respective issuer ETFs with exposure to Financial Services. To get the estimated issuer revenue from a single Financial Services ETF, the AUM is multiplied by the ETF’s expense ratio. All values are in U.S. dollars.
ETF issuers are ranked based on their aggregate 3-month fund flows of their ETFs with exposure to Financial Services. 3-month fund flows is a metric that can be used to gauge the perceived popularity amongst investors of different ETF issuers with ETFs that have exposure to Financial Services. All values are in U.S. dollars.
ETF issuers are ranked based on their AUM-weighted average 3-month return of their ETFs with exposure to Financial Services. In addition to price performance, the 3-month return assumes the reinvestment of all dividends during the last 3 months.
ETF issuers are ranked based on their aggregate assets under management (AUM) of their ETFs with exposure to Financial Services. All values are in U.S. dollars.
ETF issuers are ranked based on their AUM-weighted average expense ratios of their ETFs with exposure to Financial Services. The lower the average expense ratio of all U.S.-listed Financial Services ETFs for a given issuer, the higher the rank.
ETF issuers are ranked based on their AUM-weighted average dividend yield of their ETFs with exposure to Financial Services.
Issuer Issuer | Fund Flow Rank Fund Flow Rank |
+/- |
3-Month Fund Flow ($MM) 3-Month Fund Flow ($MM) | Return Rank Return Rank |
+/- |
Avg. 3-Month Return (%) Avg. 3-Month Return (%) | AUM Rank AUM Rank |
+/- |
Assets Under Management ($MM) Assets Under Management ($MM) | Expense Rank Expense Rank |
+/- |
Avg. Expense Ratio (%) Avg. Expense Ratio (%) | Dividend Rank Dividend Rank |
+/- |
Avg. Dividend Yield (%) Avg. Dividend Yield (%) | Revenue Rank Revenue Rank |
+/- |
Revenue ($MM) Revenue ($MM) | # of ETFs # of ETFs | issuer_power_ranking_sort_text issuer_power_ranking_sort_text |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BlackRock Financial Management | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | Blackrock Financial Management | ||||||||||||
BlackRock, Inc. | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | BlackRock, Inc. | ||||||||||||
Rafferty Asset Management LLC (Direxion) | - | - | - | - | - | - | 2 | Direxion | ||||||||||||
Exchange Traded Concepts | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | Exchange Traded Concepts | ||||||||||||
Global X Management Company LLC | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | Global X | ||||||||||||
Barclays Global Fund Advisors | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | iShares | ||||||||||||
Mirae Asset | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | Mirae Asset | ||||||||||||
Mirae Asset Global Investments Co., Ltd. | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | Mirae Asset Global Investments Co., Ltd. | ||||||||||||
Rafferty Asset Management | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | 2 | Rafferty Asset Management | ||||||||||||
Join ETF Database ELITE and Export This Data
|
* Ranks are updated on a weekly basis. Last updated on Apr 28, 2025
Inspired by record demand for ETFs, many traditional mutual fund providers have recently brought...
Grayscale today announced the launch of the Grayscale Bitcoin Adopters ETF (BCOR) on the NYSE...
Simplify has expanded its ETF lineup with the launch of the Simplify Piper Sandler US Small-Cap...
On the latest episode of ETF 360, senior industry analyst Kirsten Chang spoke to TEMA ETFs...
Bond ETFs are in demand in 2025. With less than a third of the year complete, the industry has...
The BEA’s core Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) Price Index for March showed that...
As the proliferation of active ETF strategies continues this year, advisors and investors find...
As the number and variety of ETFs continue to grow, classic ETFs have changed. Many investors are...
Gold’s rally has been evident in the increasing number of mergers and acquisitions in the...
The onset of an aggressive tariff policy, coupled with economic policy uncertainty, led to a...
Copyright © 2025 FactSet Research Systems Inc. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 2025 FactSet Research Systems Inc. All rights reserved.
A long-running debate in asset allocation circles is how much of a portfolio an investor should...
In a digital age where information moves in milliseconds and millions of participants can transact...