Are you getting the best rate from your broker?
Compare your broker's rates now to find out if you can save money
Choose your broker below
Welcome to ETFdb.com. Please help us personalize your experience.
Select the one that best describes you

HACK
ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF

Price: $46.23
Change: $0.99 (0.02%)
Category: Technology Equities
Last Updated:

Vitals

Investment Themes

Trading Data

Open - Volume -
Day Lo - Day Hi -
  • Open
  • Volume
  • Day Lo
  • Day Hi
  • 52 Week Lo $29.01
  • 52 Week Hi $51.19
  • AUM $1,491.5 M
  • Shares 32.3 M

Analyst Report

The ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF was the first ETF to focus on the cyber security industry. It tracks an index of companies involved in hardware, software and services, classifying the underlying stocks as either infrastructure or service providers. Top holdings include Cisco Systems, Akamai and Qualys,

HACK management fee matches its main competitor, the First Trust NASDAQ CEA Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR), but until recently HACK was the largest player of the two. However, since late 2020, investors have been pulling money out of HACK while CIBR has been picking up assets, in part because of concerns about the reputation of ETF Managers Group, the firm that runs HACK’s day-to-day operations.

ETFMG is facing lawsuits from former business partners alleging theft of management fees from a handful of ETFs, of which HACK is by far the largest. In December 2019, a federal judge ordered ETFMG to pay $80 million to Nasdaq, a former business partner in HACK. So far there’s little indication that the firm’s legal woes have hurt investors in the disputed funds but investors and advisers should be aware of the controversy.

One peculiarity of HACK is that, at times, an unusually large slice of HACK’s assets are invested in cash-like instruments, including VALT, ETFMG’s own short-term debt ETF. In March 2020, VALT was HACK’s biggest holding, accounting for almost 5% of the portfolio, an unusually high (and expensive) cash-like allocation for an equity index fund.

Historical Trading Data

  • 1 Month Avg. Volume 179,643
  • 3 Month Avg. Volume 174,275

Alternative ETFs in the Technology Equities Category

Type Symbol Expense Ratio Assets Avg. Daily Vol YTD Return
Cheapest FTEC 0.08% $4.5 B 485,231 25.17%
Largest (AUM) VGT 0.10% $35.7 B 831,434 25.39%
Most Liquid (Volume) XLK 0.13% $33.3 B 11 M 25.56%
Top YTD Performer CLOU 0.68% $1.2 B 1 M 49.62%

Top 15 Holdings

Concentration Analysis

This section compares how balanced and deep this ETF is relative to the peer group ETFdb.com Category.

59
Number of Holdings
28.97%
% Assets in Top 10
41.83%
% Assets in Top 15
97.65%
% Assets in Top 50
 
View Detailed Analysis
 
Number of Holdings
59
Rank
25 of 43
Low
SMH (26)
High
VGT (327)
% Assets in Top 10
28.97%
Rank
8 of 43
Low
XSW (6.96%)
High
XLK (70.10%)
% Assets in Top 15
41.83%
Rank
34 of 43
Low
XSW (10.18%)
High
SMH (79.10%)
% Assets in Top 50
97.65%
Rank
19 of 43
Low
XSW (31.93%)
High
TPAY (100.03%)

 
View Summary Analysis
 

Sector Breakdown

Asset Percentage
Common equity 96.81%
Corporate debt 3.1%
Collateralized debt 0.09%
Municipal debt 0.01%
Sector Percentage
Technology 67.52%
Other 26.42%
Non-Equity 3.19%
Industrials 2.86%
Market Cap Percentage
Small cap 38.82%
Mid cap 25.7%
Large cap 19.99%
Micro cap 12.29%
ETF or Non-equity 3.19%
Region Percentage
North America 82.49%
Europe 8.58%
Asia-Pacific 4.09%
Middle East 4.07%
Asia 0.76%
Region Percentage
United States 80.01%
Developed Markets (ex-US) 19.93%
Emerging Markets 0.05%
Country Percentage
United States 80.01%
United Kingdom 7.04%
Israel 4.07%
Japan 3.97%
Canada 2.48%
Sweden 1.11%
South Korea 0.71%
Finland 0.16%
Australia 0.13%
Germany 0.12%
Switzerland 0.1%
China 0.05%
Netherlands 0.03%
Spain 0.02%
 
View Less Charts
 
Asset Percentage
Common equity 96.81%
Corporate debt 3.1%
Collateralized debt 0.09%
Municipal debt 0.01%
 
View More Charts
 

HACK Valuation

This section shows how the P/E multiple of this ETF compares to the peer group ETFdb.com Category.

P/E Ratio
27.92
Rank
18 of 42
Low
RYT (19.92)
High
CLOU (81.99)

HACK Dividend

This section shows how the dividend yield of this ETF compares to the peer group ETFdb.com Category.

Dividend
$0.02
Dividend Date
2020-06-15
Annual Dividend Rate
$0.64

$0.02
Dividend
2020-06-15
Dividend Date
$0.64
Annual Dividend Rate
Annual Dividend Yield
1.42%
Rank
5 of 40
Low
ITEQ (0.02%)
High
TDIV (2.24%)

HACK Fund Flows

View charts featuring ETF fund flow data.

5 Day Net Flows: 0 1 Month Net Flows: 15.34 M 3 Month Net Flows: 26.22 M 6 Month Net Flows: -5.74 M 1 Year Net Flows: -227.02 M 3 Year Net Flows: -151.53 M 5 Year Net Flows: -234.36 M 10 Year Net Flows: 1.04 B

Realtime Rating

The adjacent table gives investors an individual Realtime Rating for HACK on several different metrics, including liquidity, expenses, performance, volatility, dividend, concentration of holdings in addition to an overall rating. The "A+ Metric Rated ETF" field, available to ETFdb Pro members, shows the ETF in the Technology Equities with the highest Metric Realtime Rating for each individual field. To view all of this data, sign up for a free 14-day trial for ETFdb Pro. To view information on how the ETFdb Realtime Ratings work, click here.

Sign Up for Pro to Unlock Data Sign Up
Metric Metric Realtime Rating A+ Metric Rated ETF
Liquidity n/a n/a
Expenses C n/a
Performance
Volatility
Dividend
Concentration

A+ Overall Rated ETF:

HACK Expenses & Fees

This section compares the cost efficiency of this ETF to peers in the same ETFdb.com Category.

Expenses Ratio Analysis

ETF Average
0.536%
ETF Wtd. Average
0.19%
Category Average
0.51%
Expense Ratio
0.60%
Rank
29 of 42
Low
FTEC (0.08%)
High
QQH (1.25%)
ESG Themes and Scores
4.9/10
ESG Score
30.43%
Global Percentile
23.78%
Peer Percentile
Environmental
Social
Governance
  • Environmental Scores
    • Revenue Exposure to Environmental Impact (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Severe Environment Controversies (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Sustainable Impact Solutions (%)
      1.3%
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    Carbon Intensity
    • Weighted Average Carbon Intensity (Tons of CO2e / $M Sales)
      20.98
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    Fossil Fuel Reserves
    • Fossil Fuel Reserves (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • High Impact Fossil Fuel Reserves (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    Water Stress
    • Water Stress High Risk Business Segment (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Water Stress High Risk Geography (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Water Stress Exposure Moderate (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Water Stress Exposure High (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Water Stress Exposure Low (%)
      Higher improves ESG score
    Energy Efficiency
    • Revenue Exposure to Energy Efficiency (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    Alternative Energy
    • Revenue Exposure to Alternative Energy (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    Green Building
    • Revenue Exposure to Green Building (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    Pollution Prevention
    • Revenue Exposure to Pollution Prevention (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    Water Sustainability
    • Revenue Exposure to Water Sustainability (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
  • Social Scores
    • Revenue Exposure to Social Impact (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Sustainable Impact Solutions (%)
      1.3%
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • SRI Exclusion Criteria (%)
      12.76%
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    Affordable Real Estate
    • Revenue Exposure to Affordable Real Estate (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    Education
    • Revenue Exposure to Education (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    Major Disease Treatment
    • Revenue Exposure to Major Disease Treatment (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    Healthy Nutrition
    • Revenue Exposure to Nutrition (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    Global Sanitation
    • Revenue Exposure to Sanitation (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    SME Finance
    • Revenue Exposure to SME Finance (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    Human Rights Violations
    • Human Rights Norms Violation (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Human Rights Norms Violation OR Watch List (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Severe Human Rights Controversies (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    Labor Rights Violations
    • Labor Norms Violation (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Labor Norms Violation OR Watch List (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Severe Labor Controversies (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    Customer Controversies
    • Severe Customer Controversies (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    UN Principles Violations
    • Global Compact Compliance Violation (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Global Compact Compliance Violation OR Watch List (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    Catholic Values
    • Catholic Values Fail (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    Sharia Compliant Investing
    • Islamic Non-Compliant (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    Adult Entertainment
    • Adult Entertainment Involvement (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    Alcohol
    • Alcohol Involvement (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    Gambling
    • Gambling Involvement (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    Nuclear Power
    • Nuclear Power Involvement (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    Tobacco
    • Tobacco Involvement (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    Weapons Involvement
    • Weapons Involvement (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Controversies Weapons Involvement (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    Firearms
    • Civilian Firearms Involvement (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Civilian Firearms Retailer (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Civilian Firearms Producer (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    Predatory Lending
    • Direct Predatory Lending Involvement (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    GMO Involvement
    • Genetic Engineering Involvement (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
  • Responsible Governance Score
    • Severe Governance Controversies (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    Board Flag
    • Board Flag (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    Board Independence
    • Lack of Independent Board Majority (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Board Independence (0-25%) (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Board Independence (25-50%) (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Board Independence (50-75%) (%)
      Higher improves ESG score
    • Board Independence (75-100%) (%)
      Higher improves ESG score
    Board Diversity
    • No Female Directors (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Three OR More Female Directors (%)
      Higher improves ESG score
    • Females Represent 30% of Directors (%)
      Higher improves ESG score
    Entrenched Board
    • Entrenched Board (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    Overboarding
    • Overboarding (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    Shareholder Rights
    • Negative Director Votes (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Ownership AND Control Flag (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • One Share One Vote (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • No Annual Director Elections (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Does Not Use Majority Voting (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Significant Votes Against Pay Practices (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    Fund Ownership
    • Controlling Shareholder (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Controlling Shareholder Concerns (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Cross Shareholdings (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    Poison Pill
    • Poison Pill (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    Executive Compensation
    • Pay Flag (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • No Pay Performance Link (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Lack of Internal Pay Equity (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Executive Pay Non-Disclosure (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    Accounting Flags
    • Accounting Flag (%)
      Lower improves ESG score

HACK Performance

This section shows how this ETF has performed relative to its peer group ETFdb.com Category.

0.09%
1 Week Return
-6.45%
4 Week Return
5.86%
13 Week Return
30.57%
26 Week Return
13.56%
Year to Date Return
24.76%
1 Year Return
56.32%
3 Year Return
80.02%
5 Year Return
 
View Detailed Analysis
 
1 Week Return
0.09%
Rank
30 of 43
Low
PRNT (-4.48%)
High
PTF (5.35%)
4 Week Return
-6.45%
Rank
33 of 43
Low
QQH (-10.09%)
High
PTF (-1.40%)
13 Week Return
5.86%
Rank
38 of 43
Low
PSCT (0.77%)
High
XNTK (19.79%)
26 Week Return
30.57%
Rank
40 of 42
Low
PSCT (20.78%)
High
XNTK (60.52%)
Year to Date Return
13.56%
Rank
27 of 41
Low
PSCT (-12.37%)
High
CLOU (49.62%)
1 Year Return
24.76%
Rank
28 of 38
Low
PSCT (-3.57%)
High
CLOU (58.92%)
3 Year Return
56.32%
Rank
24 of 29
Low
PRNT (-8.05%)
High
PTF (116.69%)
5 Year Return
80.02%
Rank
23 of 24
Low
PSCT (76.49%)
High
SOXX (293.81%)

 
View Summary Analysis
 

HACK Price and Volume Chart

HACK Technicals

Volatility Analysis

This section shows how the volatility of this ETF compares to the peer group ETFdb.com Category.

 
View Detailed Analysis
 
5 Day Volatility
70.34%
Rank
33 of 43
Low
KOIN (22.47%)
High
PSI (380.72%)
20 Day Volatility
29.39%
Rank
32 of 43
Low
TDIV (25.08%)
High
QQH (48.72%)
50 Day Volatility
23.65%
Rank
34 of 43
Low
TDIV (19.47%)
High
QQH (38.91%)
200 Day Volatility
25.38%
Rank
30 of 42
Low
TDIV (22.23%)
High
PTF (34.84%)
Beta
1.08
Rank
30 of 43
Low
IHAK (0.79)
High
QQH (2.75)
Standard Deviation
4.32%
Rank
28 of 38
Low
PRNT (2.26%)
High
IGV (34.68%)

 
View Summary Analysis
 

Technicals

  • 20 Day MA $47.08
  • 60 Day MA $47.27
  • MACD 15 Period 0.03
  • MACD 100 Period 0.43
  • Williams % Range 10 Day 38.11
  • Williams % Range 20 Day 78.86
  • RSI 10 Day 46
  • RSI 20 Day 47
  • RSI 30 Day 49
  • Ultimate Oscillator 58

Bollinger Brands

  • Lower Bollinger (10 Day) $45.33
  • Upper Bollinger (10 Day) $46.87
  • Lower Bollinger (20 Day) $43.84
  • Upper Bollinger (20 Day) $50.30
  • Lower Bollinger (30 Day) $44.53
  • Upper Bollinger (30 Day) $50.47

Support & Resistance

  • Support Level 1 $45.48
  • Support Level 2 $44.73
  • Resistance Level 1 $46.67
  • Resistance Level 2 $47.11

Stochastic

  • Stochastic Oscillator %D (1 Day) 63.81
  • Stochastic Oscillator %D (5 Day) 47.56
  • Stochastic Oscillator %K (1 Day) 60.39
  • Stochastic Oscillator %K (5 Day) 46.75

Fact Sheet

Fact sheets are issued by the ETF provider and framed by ETFdb.com. Information contained within the fact sheet is not guaranteed to be timely or accurate.

Download the fact sheet PDF

Brought to You by ETF Flows

Source: LSEG Information Services (US), Inc. (“LSEG”) © LSEG 2016. All rights in the XTF data, ratings and / or underlying data contained in this communication (“the XTF information”) vest in LSEG and/or its licensors. Neither LSEG nor its licensors accept any liability arising out of the use of, reliance on or any errors or omissions in the XTF information. No further distribution of the XTF information is permitted without LSEG’s express written consent. LSEG does not promote, sponsor or endorse the content of this communication.

Copyright MSCI ESG Research LLC [2018]. All Rights Reserved. MSCI ESG Research LLC’s (“MSCI ESG”) Fund Metrics products (the “Information”) provide environmental, social and governance data with respect to underlying securities within more than 23,000 multi-asset class Mutual Funds and ETFs globally. MSCI ESG is a Registered Investment Adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. MSCI ESG materials have not been submitted, to nor received approval from, the US SEC or any other regulatory body. None of the information constitutes an offer to buy or sell, or a promotion or recommendation of, any security, financial instrument or product or trading strategy, nor should it be taken as an indication or guarantee of any future performance, analysis, forecast or prediction. None of the Information can be used to determine which securities to buy or sell or when to buy or sell them. The Information is provided “as is” and the user of the Information assumes the entire risk of any use it may make or permit to be made of the Information. All Information is provided solely for your internal use, and may not be reproduced or redisseminated in any form without express prior written permission from MSCI. Neither MSCI ESG nor any of its affiliates or any third party involved in or related to creating any Information makes any express or implied warranties, representations or guarantees, and in no event will MSCI ESG or any such affiliate or third party have any liability for any direct, indirect, special, punitive, consequential or any other damages (including lost profits) relating to any Information. More information on MSCI ESG Fund Metrics, provided by MSCI ESG Research LLC, can be found at https://www.msci.com/esg-fund-metrics.
© 2020 Market data provided is at least 15-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions.

Information is provided 'as is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use, please see disclaimer.
Help & Info
Tools
More Tools
Explore ETFs
Legal