CIBR
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF

Price: $41.17
Change: $1.17 (0.03%)
Category: Technology Equities
Last Updated:

Vitals

Issuer First Trust
Brand First Trust
Structure ETF
Expense Ratio 0.60%
ETF Home Page Home page
Inception Jul 07, 2015
Index Tracked Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index

Analyst Report

The First Trust NASDAQ CEA Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) tracks an index of companies engaged in the cybersecurity segment of the tech and industrial sectors. To make the cut, a company must be classified as a cybersecurity company by the Consumer Technology Association and have a minimum market cap of $250 million. Te ensure liquidity in the underlying stocks, which is a concern for ETFs that invest in small-cap names, companies must have a minimum free-float of 20%. The index then weights stocks based on their underlying liquidity, and imposes caps on how large any one security can become. The portfolio includes familiar names like Cisco Systems, Akamai and NortonLifeLock.


Though priced the same as its main rival, the ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF (HACK), CIBR was long overshadowed because HACK had the advantage of being the first cybersecurity ETF on the market. However, CIBR has since overtaken HACK in assets and inflows, due in part to controversies that have damaged the reputation of ETF Managers Group, the firm that runs HACK’s day-to-day operations.


CIBR is a bit on the expensive side for an index-tracking fund, but that’s par for the course with niche funds. CIBR is a good choice for investors who want targeted exposure to cybersecurity, but there are cheaper alternatives available for buy-and-hold investors looking for broad exposure to tech.

ETF Database Themes

Category Technology Equities
Asset Class Equity
Asset Class Size Multi-Cap
Asset Class Style Growth
Sector (General) Technology
Sector (Specific) Internet Architecture
Region (General) North America
Region (Specific) U.S.

FactSet Classifications

Segment Equity: Global Cybersecurity
Category Sector
Focus Theme
Niche Cybersecurity
Strategy Vanilla
Weighting Scheme Tiered

Trading Data

Open - Volume -
Day Lo - Day Hi -
  • Open
  • Volume
  • Day Lo
  • Day Hi
  • 52 Week Lo $38.08
  • 52 Week Hi $56.26
  • AUM $4,941.3 M
  • Shares 123.5 M

Historical Trading Data

  • 1 Month Avg. Volume 876,336
  • 3 Month Avg. Volume 1,085,809

Alternative ETFs in the ETF Database Technology Equities Category

Type Symbol Expense Ratio Assets Avg. Daily Vol YTD Return
Cheapest FTEC 0.08% $5.1 B 355,056 -27.25%
Largest (AUM) VGT 0.10% $40.4 B 858,353 -27.33%
Most Liquid (Volume) XLK 0.10% $38.0 B 11 M -25.58%
Top YTD Performer FITE 0.45% $27.4 M 4,944 -15.76%

Alternative ETFs in the FactSet Equity: Global Cybersecurity Segment

Type Symbol Expense Ratio Assets Avg. Daily Vol YTD Return
Cheapest IHAK 0.47% $518.3 M 117,336 -19.47%
Largest (AUM) HACK 0.60% $1.6 B 208,895 -24.38%
Most Liquid (Volume) BUG 0.50% $1.1 B 398,558 -18.89%
Top YTD Performer BUG 0.50% $1.1 B 398,558 -18.89%

Top 15 Holdings

Concentration Analysis

This section compares how balanced and deep this ETF is relative to its peers.

Holdings Comparison

CIBR ETF Database Category Average FactSet Segment Average
Number of Holdings 40 82 44
% of Assets in Top 10 46.99% 45.99% 55.93%
% of Assets in Top 15 61.77% 58.33% 71.60%
% of Assets in Top 50 100.01% 91.47% 100.85%

Size Comparison

CIBR ETF Database Category Average FactSet Segment Average
Large (>12.9B) 58.95% 59.76% 55.26%
Mid (>2.7B) 33.63% 21.19% 36.67%
Small (>600M) 6.53% 14.24% 7.04%
Micro (<600M) 0.88% 4.80% 1.03%

CIBR Valuation

This section compares the P/E ratio of this ETF to its peers.

CIBR
P/E Ratio
28.05
ETF Database Category Average
P/E Ratio
27.16
FactSet Segment Average
P/E Ratio
23.75

CIBR Dividend

This section compares the dividend yield of this ETF to its peers.

CIBR ETF Database Category Average FactSet Segment Average
Dividend $ 0.03 $ 0.12 $ 0.04
Dividend Date 2021-06-24 N/A N/A
Annual Dividend Rate $ 0.06 $ 0.31 $ 0.06
Annual Dividend Yield 0.11% 0.28% 0.12%

CIBR Price and Volume Charts

View charts featuring CIBR price and volume data.

CIBR Fund Flows Charts

View charts featuring ETF fund flow data.

5 Day Net Flows: -215.59 M 1 Month Net Flows: -68.95 M 3 Month Net Flows: 262.25 M 6 Month Net Flows: 723.16 M 1 Year Net Flows: 1.94 B 3 Year Net Flows: 3.91 B 5 Year Net Flows: 4.41 B 10 Year Net Flows: 4.66 B

CIBR Price vs Flows AUM Influence Charts

View charts that break down the influence that fund flows and price had on overall assets.

5 Day Net AUM Change: -213.05 M
1 Month Net AUM Change: -25.73 M
3 Month Net AUM Change: -1.11 B
6 Month Net AUM Change: -609.34 M
1 Year Net AUM Change: 980.82 M
3 Year Net AUM Change: 3.99 B
5 Year Net AUM Change: 4.68 B
10 Year Net AUM Change: 4.94 B

Realtime Rating

The adjacent table gives investors an individual Realtime Rating for CIBR on several different metrics, including liquidity, expenses, performance, volatility, dividend, concentration of holdings in addition to an overall rating. The "A+ Metric Rated ETF" field, available to ETF Database Pro members, shows the ETF in the Technology Equities with the highest Metric Realtime Rating for each individual field. To view all of this data, sign up for a free 14-day trial for ETF Database Pro. To view information on how the ETF Database Realtime Ratings work, click here.

Sign Up for Pro to Unlock Data Sign Up
Metric Metric Realtime Rating A+ Metric Rated ETF
Liquidity n/a n/a
Expenses B n/a
Performance
Volatility
Dividend
Concentration

A+ Overall Rated ETF:

CIBR Expenses & Fees

This section compares the cost efficiency of this ETF to its peers.

Expenses Ratio Analysis

CIBR
Expense Ratio
0.60%
ETF Database Category Average
Expense Ratio
0.55%
FactSet Segment Average
Expense Ratio
0.62%

Tax Analysis

Max ST Capital Gains Rate 39.60%
Max LT Capital Gains Rate 20.00%
Tax On Distributions Qualified dividends
Distributes K1 No
ESG Themes and Scores
8.09/10
ESG Score
72.26%
Global Percentile
58.36%
Peer Percentile
Environmental
Social
Governance
  • Environmental Scores
    • Revenue Exposure to Environmental Impact (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Severe Environment Controversies (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Sustainable Impact Solutions (%)
      3.15%
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    Carbon Intensity
    • Weighted Average Carbon Intensity (Tons of CO2e / $M Sales)
      10.59
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    Fossil Fuel Reserves
    • Fossil Fuel Reserves (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • High Impact Fossil Fuel Reserves (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    Water Stress
    • Water Stress High Risk Business Segment (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Water Stress High Risk Geography (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Water Stress Exposure Moderate (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Water Stress Exposure High (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Water Stress Exposure Low (%)
      Higher improves ESG score
    Energy Efficiency
    • Revenue Exposure to Energy Efficiency (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    Alternative Energy
    • Revenue Exposure to Alternative Energy (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    Green Building
    • Revenue Exposure to Green Building (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    Pollution Prevention
    • Revenue Exposure to Pollution Prevention (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    Water Sustainability
    • Revenue Exposure to Water Sustainability (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
  • Social Scores
    • Revenue Exposure to Social Impact (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Sustainable Impact Solutions (%)
      3.15%
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • SRI Exclusion Criteria (%)
      9.94%
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    Affordable Real Estate
    • Revenue Exposure to Affordable Real Estate (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    Education
    • Revenue Exposure to Education (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    Major Disease Treatment
    • Revenue Exposure to Major Disease Treatment (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    Healthy Nutrition
    • Revenue Exposure to Nutrition (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    Global Sanitation
    • Revenue Exposure to Sanitation (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    SME Finance
    • Revenue Exposure to SME Finance (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    Human Rights Violations
    • Human Rights Norms Violation (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Human Rights Norms Violation OR Watch List (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Severe Human Rights Controversies (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    Labor Rights Violations
    • Labor Norms Violation (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Labor Norms Violation OR Watch List (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Severe Labor Controversies (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    Customer Controversies
    • Severe Customer Controversies (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    UN Principles Violations
    • Global Compact Compliance Violation (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Global Compact Compliance Violation OR Watch List (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    Catholic Values
    • Catholic Values Fail (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    Sharia Compliant Investing
    • Islamic Non-Compliant (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    Adult Entertainment
    • Adult Entertainment Involvement (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    Alcohol
    • Alcohol Involvement (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    Gambling
    • Gambling Involvement (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    Nuclear Power
    • Nuclear Power Involvement (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    Tobacco
    • Tobacco Involvement (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    Weapons Involvement
    • Weapons Involvement (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Controversies Weapons Involvement (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    Firearms
    • Civilian Firearms Involvement (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Civilian Firearms Retailer (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Civilian Firearms Producer (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    Predatory Lending
    • Direct Predatory Lending Involvement (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    GMO Involvement
    • Genetic Engineering Involvement (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
  • Responsible Governance Score
    • Severe Governance Controversies (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    Board Flag
    • Board Flag (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    Board Independence
    • Lack of Independent Board Majority (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Board Independence (0-25%) (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Board Independence (25-50%) (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Board Independence (50-75%) (%)
      Higher improves ESG score
    • Board Independence (75-100%) (%)
      Higher improves ESG score
    Board Diversity
    • No Female Directors (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Three OR More Female Directors (%)
      Higher improves ESG score
    • Females Represent 30% of Directors (%)
      Higher improves ESG score
    Entrenched Board
    • Entrenched Board (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    Overboarding
    • Overboarding (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    Shareholder Rights
    • Negative Director Votes (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Ownership AND Control Flag (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • One Share One Vote (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • No Annual Director Elections (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Does Not Use Majority Voting (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Significant Votes Against Pay Practices (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    Fund Ownership
    • Controlling Shareholder (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Controlling Shareholder Concerns (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Cross Shareholdings (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    Poison Pill
    • Poison Pill (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    Executive Compensation
    • Pay Flag (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • No Pay Performance Link (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Lack of Internal Pay Equity (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Executive Pay Non-Disclosure (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    Accounting Flags
    • Accounting Flag (%)
      Lower improves ESG score

CIBR Performance

This section shows how this ETF has performed relative to its peers.

CIBR ETF Database
Category Average 		Factset Segment
Average
1 Month Return 1.68% -3.88% 1.30%
3 Month Return -21.38% -23.80% -21.28%
YTD Return -21.99% -32.00% -25.91%
1 Year Return -11.75% -22.80% -19.19%
3 Year Return 47.50% 23.05% 21.94%
5 Year Return 95.09% 40.64% 30.45%

Geographic Exposure

The following charts reflect the geographic spread of CIBR's underlying holdings.

Region Percentage
North, Central and South America 92.33%
Europe 3.81%
Asia Pacific 3.49%
Other 0.38%
Country Percentage
United States 82.95%
Israel 6.26%
France 3.01%
India 2.97%
South Korea 1.75%
Japan 1.74%
United Kingdom 0.95%
Other 0.38%

Holdings Analysis

The following charts reflect the allocation of CIBR's underlying holdings.

Sector Percentage
Technology Services 77.77%
Electronic Technology 18.47%
Commercial Services 3.39%
CASH 0.38%
Other 0.0%
Market Cap Percentage
Large 58.95%
Mid 33.63%
Small 6.53%
Micro 0.88%
Region Percentage
Asset Percentage
Share/Common/Ordinary 96.66%
American Depositary Receipt 2.97%
CASH 0.38%
Other 0.0%
 
View Less Charts
 
Sector Percentage
Technology Services 77.77%
Electronic Technology 18.47%
Commercial Services 3.39%
CASH 0.38%
Other 0.0%
 
View More Charts
 

CIBR Technicals

Volatility Analysis

This section shows how the volatility of this ETF compares to the peer group ETF Database Category.

5 Day Volatility 238.72%
20 Day Volatility 39.68%
50 Day Volatility 43.01%
200 Day Volatility 38.70%
Beta 1.02
Standard Deviation 3.81%
 
View Detailed Analysis
 
5 Day Volatility
238.72%
Rank
23 of 69
Low
INQQ (5.90%)
High
BLOK (476.73%)
20 Day Volatility
39.68%
Rank
43 of 69
Low
QQH (16.67%)
High
BKCH (88.25%)
50 Day Volatility
43.01%
Rank
36 of 68
Low
QQH (28.71%)
High
DAPP (93.56%)
200 Day Volatility
38.70%
Rank
43 of 67
Low
QQH (24.72%)
High
DAPP (89.83%)
Beta
1.02
Rank
47 of 63
Low
IWFH (-1.66)
High
BKCH (4.37)
Standard Deviation
3.81%
Rank
46 of 59
Low
VPN (1.04%)
High
IGV (52.29%)

 
View Summary Analysis
 

Technicals

  • 20 Day MA $41.50
  • 60 Day MA $45.44
  • MACD 15 Period -0.02
  • MACD 100 Period -5.66
  • Williams % Range 10 Day 43.82
  • Williams % Range 20 Day 48.33
  • RSI 10 Day 51
  • RSI 20 Day 46
  • RSI 30 Day 45
  • Ultimate Oscillator 49

Bollinger Bands

  • Lower Bollinger (10 Day) $37.65
  • Upper Bollinger (10 Day) $42.58
  • Lower Bollinger (20 Day) $38.06
  • Upper Bollinger (20 Day) $44.92
  • Lower Bollinger (30 Day) $38.20
  • Upper Bollinger (30 Day) $44.20

Support & Resistance

  • Support Level 1 $40.32
  • Support Level 2 $39.47
  • Resistance Level 1 $41.68
  • Resistance Level 2 $42.19

Stochastic

  • Stochastic Oscillator %D (1 Day) 59.54
  • Stochastic Oscillator %D (5 Day) 67.29
  • Stochastic Oscillator %K (1 Day) 47.31
  • Stochastic Oscillator %K (5 Day) 48.11

Tradability

  • Tracking Difference Median (%) -0.90
  • Tracking Difference Max Upside (%) -0.49
  • Tracking Difference Max Downside (%) -1.30
  • Median Premium Discount (%) 0.05
  • Maximum Premium Discount (%) 0.60
  • Average Spread (%) 2.91
  • Average Spread ($) 2.91

Financial Advisor Report

ETF Database's Financial Advisor Reports are designed as an easy handout for clients to explain the key information on a fund. Includes new analyst insights and classification data.

Fact Sheet

A fact sheet is not available for this ETF. Please visit the CIBR ETF home page for more information.

Data Lineage

ETF Trends and ETF Database , the preeminent digital platforms for ETF news, research, tools, video, webcasts, native content channels, and more. The ETF Trends and ETF Database brands have been trusted amongst advisors, institutional investors, and individual investors for a combined 25 years. The firms are uniquely positioned to aid advisor’s education, adoption, and usage of ETFs, as well as the asset management community’s transition from traditionally analog to digital interactions with the advisor community.

Our team at ETF Database is committed to making our website the premier source of information on ETF investing with the world’s highest quality ETF tools, content, and resources.

Have Questions? Contact Us.

Powered By:

FactSet
Barchart

Analyst Report Authors

ETF Database analysts have a combined 50 years in the ETF and Financial markets, covering every asset class and investment style. The team monitors new filings, new launches and new issuers to make sure we place each new ETF in the appropriate context so Financial Advisors can construct high quality portfolios.

Disclosures

Copyright © 2022 FactSet Research Systems Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright MSCI ESG Research LLC [2018]. All Rights Reserved. MSCI ESG Research LLC’s (“MSCI ESG”) Fund Metrics products (the “Information”) provide environmental, social and governance data with respect to underlying securities within more than 23,000 multi-asset class Mutual Funds and ETFs globally. MSCI ESG is a Registered Investment Adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. MSCI ESG materials have not been submitted, to nor received approval from, the US SEC or any other regulatory body. None of the information constitutes an offer to buy or sell, or a promotion or recommendation of, any security, financial instrument or product or trading strategy, nor should it be taken as an indication or guarantee of any future performance, analysis, forecast or prediction. None of the Information can be used to determine which securities to buy or sell or when to buy or sell them. The Information is provided “as is” and the user of the Information assumes the entire risk of any use it may make or permit to be made of the Information. All Information is provided solely for your internal use, and may not be reproduced or redisseminated in any form without express prior written permission from MSCI. Neither MSCI ESG nor any of its affiliates or any third party involved in or related to creating any Information makes any express or implied warranties, representations or guarantees, and in no event will MSCI ESG or any such affiliate or third party have any liability for any direct, indirect, special, punitive, consequential or any other damages (including lost profits) relating to any Information. More information on MSCI ESG Fund Metrics, provided by MSCI ESG Research LLC, can be found at https://www.msci.com/esg-fund-metrics.
© 2022 Market data provided is at least 15-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions.

Information is provided 'as is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use, please see disclaimer.
Help & Info
Tools
More Tools
Explore ETFs
Legal