Etfdb logo
  • ETF
  • QLD
    Pricing Data
    $76.58
    Change: $1.46 (0.02%)
    Time: 01/18/19
    Previous Close: $75.12
  • Category
  • Leveraged Equities
  • ESG Score
Last Updated:

Profile

Vitals

Trading Data

Open: - Volume -
Day Lo - Day Hi -
  • 52 Week Lo: $58.40
  • 52 Week Hi: $102.44
  • AUM: $1,632.1 M
  • Shares: 21.3 M

Investment Themes

Historical Trading Data

  • 1 Month Avg. Volume: 2,570,354
  • 3 Month Avg. Volume: 2,347,851

Alternative ETFs in the Leveraged Equities Category

Type Ticker Expense Ratio Assets Avg. Daily Vol YTD Return
Cheapest FRLG $458.0 M 42,381 14.65%
Largest (AUM) TQQQ 0.95% $3,685.8 M 22,922,242 21.25%
Most Liquid (Volume) SQQQ 0.95% $919.9 M 43,867,536 -20.53%
Top YTD Performer XCOM 0.95% $4.1 M 10,343 642757.13%

Analyst Report

This ETF offers 2x daily long leverage to the NASDAQ-100 Index, making it a powerful tool for investors with a bullish short-term outlook for technology equities. Investors should note that QLD's leverage resets on a daily basis, which results in compounding of returns when held for multiple periods. QLD can be a powerful tool for sophisticated investors, but should be avoided by those with a low risk tolerance or a buy-and-hold strategy.

Realtime Rating

Sign Up for Pro to Unlock Data Sign Up

Realtime Rating Summary

The adjacent table gives investors an individual Realtime Rating for QLD on several different metrics, including liquidity, expenses, performance, volatility, dividend, concentration of holdings in addition to an overall rating. The "A+ Metric Rated ETF" field, available to ETFdb Pro members, shows the ETF in the Leveraged Equities with the highest Metric Realtime Rating for each individual field. To view all of this data, sign up for a free 14-day trial for ETFdb Pro. To view information on how the ETFdb Realtime Ratings work, click here.

Compare to another ETF

View the Category Report

QLD Overall Realtime Rating:

A+ Overall Rated ETF:

Metric Metric Realtime Rating A+ Metric Rated ETF
Liquidity A n/a
Expenses C+ n/a
Performance
Volatility
Dividend
Concentration

QLD In-Depth Analysis

The following tables and charts contain in-depth metrics for this ETF and compare it to similar peer ETFs within its ETFdb.com Category.

QLD Holdings

Filings Data as of: Jan 18, 2019

Concentration Analysis

This section compares how balanced and deep this ETF is relative to the peer group ETFdb.com Category.

Number of Holdings
Rank: 55 of 150
104
Category Low TECS (1)
Category High TWM (2017)
% Assets in Top 10
Rank: 59 of 150
51.91%
Category Low SRTY (2.92%)
Category High FNGD (112.89%)
% Assets in Top 15
Rank: 96 of 150
60.10%
Category Low SRTY (4.05%)
Category High ERY (100.00%)
% Assets in Top 50
Rank: 97 of 150
86.77%
Category Low SRTY (11.10%)
Category High DXD (100.00%)

QLD Expenses & Fees

This section compares the cost efficiency of this ETF to peers in the same ETFdb.com Category.

Expenses Ratio Analysis

ETF Average
0.546%
ETF Wtd. Average
0.21%
Category Average
0.97%
Expense Ratio
Rank: 72 of 159
0.95%
Category Low FIEG (0.10%)
Category High INDL (1.36%)

Commission Free Trading

This ETF is not currently available for commission free trading on any platforms.

Category Commission Free Trading

There are 6 other ETFs in the Leveraged Equities ETFdb.com Category that are also eligible for commission free trading:

QLD ESG Themes and Scores
  • 5.73/10
    ESG Score
  • 57.48%
    ESG Score Global Percentile (%)
  • 0.0%
    ESG Score Peer Percentile (%)
    • Revenue Exposure to Environmental Impact (%)

      Higher Improves ESG Score
    • Severe Environment Controversies (%)

      Lower Improves ESG Score
    • Sustainable Impact Solutions (%)
      6.76%

      Higher Improves ESG Score
    • Weighted Average Carbon Intensity (Tons of CO2e / $M Sales)
      30.53

      Lower Improves ESG Score
    • Fossil Fuel Reserves (%)

      Lower Improves ESG Score
    • High Impact Fossil Fuel Reserves (%)

      Lower Improves ESG Score
    • Water Stress High Risk Business Segment (%)

      Lower Improves ESG Score
    • Water Stress High Risk Geography (%)

      Lower Improves ESG Score
    • Water Stress Exposure Moderate (%)

      Lower Improves ESG Score
    • Water Stress Exposure High (%)

      Lower Improves ESG Score
    • Water Stress Exposure Low (%)

      Higher Improves ESG Score
    • Revenue Exposure to Energy Efficiency (%)

      Higher Improves ESG Score
    • Revenue Exposure to Alternative Energy (%)

      Higher Improves ESG Score
    • Revenue Exposure to Green Building (%)

      Higher Improves ESG Score
    • Revenue Exposure to Pollution Prevention (%)

      Higher Improves ESG Score
    • Revenue Exposure to Water Sustainability (%)

      Higher Improves ESG Score
    • Revenue Exposure to Social Impact (%)

      Higher Improves ESG Score
    • Sustainable Impact Solutions (%)
      6.76%

      Higher Improves ESG Score
    • SRI Exclusion Criteria (%)
      10.4%

      Higher Improves ESG Score
    • Revenue Exposure to Affordable Real Estate (%)

      Higher Improves ESG Score
    • Revenue Exposure to Education (%)

      Higher Improves ESG Score
    • Revenue Exposure to Major Disease Treatment (%)

      Higher Improves ESG Score
    • Revenue Exposure to Nutrition (%)

      Higher Improves ESG Score
    • Revenue Exposure to Sanitation (%)

      Higher Improves ESG Score
    • Revenue Exposure to SME Finance (%)

      Higher Improves ESG Score
    • Human Rights Norms Violation (%)

      Lower Improves ESG Score
    • Human Rights Norms Violation OR Watch List (%)

      Lower Improves ESG Score
    • Severe Human Rights Controversies (%)

      Lower Improves ESG Score
    • Labor Norms Violation (%)

      Lower Improves ESG Score
    • Labor Norms Violation OR Watch List (%)

      Lower Improves ESG Score
    • Severe Labor Controversies (%)

      Lower Improves ESG Score
    • Severe Customer Controversies (%)

      Lower Improves ESG Score
    • Global Compact Compliance Violation (%)

      Lower Improves ESG Score
    • Global Compact Compliance Violation OR Watch List (%)

      Lower Improves ESG Score
    • Catholic Values Fail (%)

      Lower Improves ESG Score
    • Islamic Non-Compliant (%)

      Lower Improves ESG Score
    • Adult Entertainment Involvement (%)

      Lower Improves ESG Score
    • Alcohol Involvement (%)

      Lower Improves ESG Score
    • Gambling Involvement (%)

      Lower Improves ESG Score
    • Nuclear Power Involvement (%)

      Lower Improves ESG Score
    • Tobacco Involvement (%)

      Lower Improves ESG Score
    • Weapons Involvement (%)

      Lower Improves ESG Score
    • Controversies Weapons Involvement (%)

      Lower Improves ESG Score
    • Civilian Firearms Involvement (%)

      Lower Improves ESG Score
    • Civilian Firearms Retailer (%)

      Lower Improves ESG Score
    • Civilian Firearms Producer (%)

      Lower Improves ESG Score
    • Direct Predatory Lending Involvement (%)

      Lower Improves ESG Score
    • Genetic Engineering Involvement (%)

      Lower Improves ESG Score
    • Severe Governance Controversies (%)

      Lower Improves ESG Score
    • Board Flag (%)

      Lower Improves ESG Score
    • Lack of Independent Board Majority (%)

      Lower Improves ESG Score
    • Board Independence (0-25%) (%)

      Lower Improves ESG Score
    • Board Independence (25-50%) (%)

      Lower Improves ESG Score
    • Board Independence (50-75%) (%)

      Higher Improves ESG Score
    • Board Independence (75-100%) (%)

      Higher Improves ESG Score
    • No Female Directors (%)

      Lower Improves ESG Score
    • Three OR More Female Directors (%)

      Higher Improves ESG Score
    • Females Represent 30% of Directors (%)

      Higher Improves ESG Score
    • Entrenched Board (%)

      Lower Improves ESG Score
    • Overboarding (%)

      Lower Improves ESG Score
    • Negative Director Votes (%)

      Lower Improves ESG Score
    • Ownership AND Control Flag (%)

      Lower Improves ESG Score
    • One Share One Vote (%)

      Lower Improves ESG Score
    • No Annual Director Elections (%)

      Lower Improves ESG Score
    • Does Not Use Majority Voting (%)

      Lower Improves ESG Score
    • Significant Votes Against Pay Practices (%)

      Lower Improves ESG Score
    • Controlling Shareholder (%)

      Lower Improves ESG Score
    • Controlling Shareholder Concerns (%)

      Lower Improves ESG Score
    • Cross Shareholdings (%)

      Lower Improves ESG Score
    • Poison Pill (%)

      Lower Improves ESG Score
    • Pay Flag (%)

      Lower Improves ESG Score
    • No Pay Performance Link (%)

      Lower Improves ESG Score
    • Lack of Internal Pay Equity (%)

      Lower Improves ESG Score
    • Executive Pay Non-Disclosure (%)

      Lower Improves ESG Score
    • Accounting Flag (%)

      Lower Improves ESG Score

QLD Performance

This section shows how this ETF has performed relative to its peer group ETFdb.com Category.

1 Week Return
Rank: 44 of 155
5.48%
Category Low WDRW (-17.34%)
Category High XCOM (642757.13%)
4 Week Return
Rank: 53 of 155
24.72%
Category Low LABD (-55.88%)
Category High XCOM (642757.13%)
13 Week Return
Rank: 103 of 150
-11.59%
Category Low GUSH (-57.96%)
Category High XCOM (337400.00%)
26 Week Return
Rank: 94 of 148
-18.37%
Category Low GUSH (-66.62%)
Category High XCOM (622976.94%)
Year to Date Return
Rank: 64 of 155
13.98%
Category Low GASX (-44.26%)
Category High XCOM (642757.13%)
1 Year Return
Rank: 47 of 138
-7.62%
Category Low NAIL (-70.82%)
Category High XCOM (224900.02%)
3 Year Return
Rank: 19 of 123
142.66%
Category Low JDST (-99.22%)
Category High XCOM (949.22%)
5 Year Return
Rank: 7 of 97
210.47%
Category Low GASL (-99.95%)
Category High SOXL (464.93%)

QLD Fund Flows

This section compares the fund flows of this ETF to peers in the same ETFdb.com Category.

1 Week Fund Flow
Rank: 66 of 72
‑$11.0 M
Category Low TQQQ (‑$43.3 M)
Category High SQQQ ($71.4 M)
4 Week Fund Flow
Rank: 108 of 116
‑$44.0 M
Category Low TQQQ (‑$263.7 M)
Category High SQQQ ($395.3 M)
13 Week Fund Flow
Rank: 111 of 135
‑$13.6 M
Category Low NUGT (‑$175.3 M)
Category High TQQQ ($526.6 M)
26 Week Fund Flow
Rank: 16 of 147
$76.3 M
Category Low TZA (‑$170.2 M)
Category High TQQQ ($1,394.9 M)
Year to Date Fund Flow
Rank: 102 of 109
‑$47.5 M
Category Low TQQQ (‑$272.9 M)
Category High SQQQ ($413.9 M)
1 Year Fund Flow
Rank: 21 of 153
$81.8 M
Category Low DUST (‑$413.1 M)
Category High FIYY ($1,402.8 M)
3 Year Fund Flow
Rank: 5 of 154
$1,050.7 M
Category Low FAS (‑$784.6 M)
Category High TQQQ ($1,855.7 M)
5 Year Fund Flow
Rank: 9 of 154
$977.3 M
Category Low SSO (‑$2,452.1 M)
Category High TQQQ ($2,255.3 M)

Brought to You by Mitre Media


Charts

The following charts can be customized to display historical performance in a number of different formats, including line charts, bar charts, and candlesticks. Time periods can be adjusted to increase or decrease the period shown, ranging from five minutes to several months.

The following chart also includes the option to compare the performance of QLD relative to other ETFs and benchmarks or to include indicators such as Bollinger Bands, relative strength, and moving averages.

QLD Valuation

This section shows how the P/E multiple of this ETF compares to the peer group ETFdb.com Category.

P/E Ratio
Rank: 62 of 69
19.14
Category Low RUSL (5.45)
Category High GDXX (26.63)

QLD Dividend

This section shows how the dividend yield of this ETF compares to the peer group ETFdb.com Category.

Dividend
$0.04
Dividend Date
2018-12-26
Annual Dividend Rate
$0.04
Annual Dividend Yield
Rank: 127 of 129
0.05%
Category Low ZBIO (0.03%)
Category High AMJL (18.15%)

QLD Technicals

Volatility Analysis

This section shows how the volatility of this ETF compares to the peer group ETFdb.com Category.

5 Day Volatility
Rank: 33 of 155
316.72%
Category Low PPEM (10.68%)
Category High XCOM (5855.19%)
20 Day Volatility
Rank: 73 of 155
67.71%
Category Low PPEM (20.83%)
Category High XCOM (3057.23%)
50 Day Volatility
Rank: 77 of 150
63.62%
Category Low PPDM (23.15%)
Category High XCOM (2043.23%)
200 Day Volatility
Rank: 77 of 148
56.60%
Category Low PPDM (21.13%)
Category High XCOM (1481.94%)
Beta
Rank: 43 of 147
2.35
Category Low FNGU (-7.83)
Category High FNGD (7.78)
Standard Deviation
Rank: 38 of 138
9.10%
Category Low LBDC (1.01%)
Category High SOXL (31.10%)

Technicals

  • 20 Day MA: $69.08
  • 60 Day MA: $75.57
  • MACD 15 Period: 5.63
  • MACD 100 Period: -7.09
  • Williams % Range 10 Day: 8.76
  • Williams % Range 20 Day: 4.06
  • RSI 10 Day: 65
  • RSI 20 Day: 54
  • RSI 30 Day: 51
  • Ultimate Oscillator: 65

Bollinger Brands

  • Lower Bollinger (10 Day): $69.15
  • Upper Bollinger (10 Day): $76.55
  • Lower Bollinger (20 Day): $59.86
  • Upper Bollinger (20 Day): $77.86
  • Lower Bollinger (30 Day): $61.06
  • Upper Bollinger (30 Day): $80.40

Support & Resistance

  • Support Level 1: $75.50
  • Support Level 2: $74.41
  • Resistance Level 1: $77.51
  • Resistance Level 2: $78.43

Stochastic

  • Stochastic Oscillator %D (1 Day): 60.81
  • Stochastic Oscillator %D (5 Day): 83.70
  • Stochastic Oscillator %K (1 Day): 63.49
  • Stochastic Oscillator %K (5 Day): 81.51

Fact Sheet

Fact sheets are issued by the ETF provider and framed by ETFdb.com. Information contained within the fact sheet is not guaranteed to be timely or accurate.

Source: LSEG Information Services (US), Inc. (“LSEG”) © LSEG 2016. All rights in the XTF data, ratings and / or underlying data contained in this communication (“the XTF information”) vest in LSEG and/or its licensors. Neither LSEG nor its licensors accept any liability arising out of the use of, reliance on or any errors or omissions in the XTF information. No further distribution of the XTF information is permitted without LSEG’s express written consent. LSEG does not promote, sponsor or endorse the content of this communication.

Copyright MSCI ESG Research LLC [2018]. All Rights Reserved. MSCI ESG Research LLC’s (“MSCI ESG”) Fund Metrics products (the “Information”) provide environmental, social and governance data with respect to underlying securities within more than 23,000 multi-asset class Mutual Funds and ETFs globally. MSCI ESG is a Registered Investment Adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. MSCI ESG materials have not been submitted, to nor received approval from, the US SEC or any other regulatory body. None of the information constitutes an offer to buy or sell, or a promotion or recommendation of, any security, financial instrument or product or trading strategy, nor should it be taken as an indication or guarantee of any future performance, analysis, forecast or prediction. None of the Information can be used to determine which securities to buy or sell or when to buy or sell them. The Information is provided “as is” and the user of the Information assumes the entire risk of any use it may make or permit to be made of the Information. All Information is provided solely for your internal use, and may not be reproduced or redisseminated in any form without express prior written permission from MSCI. Neither MSCI ESG nor any of its affiliates or any third party involved in or related to creating any Information makes any express or implied warranties, representations or guarantees, and in no event will MSCI ESG or any such affiliate or third party have any liability for any direct, indirect, special, punitive, consequential or any other damages (including lost profits) relating to any Information. More information on MSCI ESG Fund Metrics, provided by MSCI ESG Research LLC, can be found at https://www.msci.com/esg-fund-metrics.
© 2019 Market data provided is at least 15-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions.

Information is provided 'as is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use, please see disclaimer.