Are you getting the best rate from your broker?
Compare your broker's rates now to find out if you can save money

Choose your broker below
Welcome to ETFdb.com. Please help us personalize your experience.

Select the one that best describes you

SPTM
SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF

Price: $39.90
Change: $0.68 (-0.02%)
Category: All Cap Equities
Last Updated:

Vitals

Investment Themes

Trading Data

Open - Volume -
Day Lo - Day Hi -
  • Open
  • Volume
  • Day Lo
  • Day Hi
  • 52 Week Lo $26.48
  • 52 Week Hi $43.74
  • AUM $3,584.1 M
  • Shares 88.7 M

Analyst Report

The SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) tracks the S&P Composite 1500 Index, which offers broad exposure to the U.S. equity market. SPTM invests in more than a thousand different companies across all sectors and sizes, making SPTM an appealing option for investors looking to simplify their portfolios and minimize rebalancing obligations. SPTM can easily serve as the core holding of a long-term portfolio. As with all of State Street’s SPDR “Portfolio” lineup, SPTM competes on price with ultra-low-cost funds like the Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI), the Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB) and the iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). All four funds charge the same barely-there management fee. The funds have broadly similar allocations when it comes to sector and market-cap, though investors should note that SPTM leans more heavily on large-cap stocks than the other three. Those seeking more exposure to smaller U.S. companies may want to use SPTM alongside small-cap funds. SPTM is also a relative latecomer to the low-cost market and lags its main rivals in assets, but still offers plenty of liquidity.

State Street launched its ultra-low-cost SPDR Portfolio lineup in October 2017 after years of losing market share to cheaper rivals at BlackRock, Schwab, and Vanguard. This was a humiliating setback since State Street pretty much founded the modern ETF market in 1993 with the launch of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY). State Street was late to the ultra-low-cost space — BlackRock launched its low-cost iShares Core series five years earlier — but has pushed hard to make up ground. Many of its “Portfolio” funds, including SPTM, were renamed and repriced for this purpose. Prior to October 2017, SPTM tracked the Russell 3000 index and traded under the ticker THRK. Prior to January 24, 2020, it tracked the SSgA Total Stock Market Index.

Historical Trading Data

  • 1 Month Avg. Volume 436,838
  • 3 Month Avg. Volume 513,049

Alternative ETFs in the All Cap Equities Category

Type Symbol Expense Ratio Assets Avg. Daily Vol YTD Return
Cheapest SPYD 0.07% $2.0 B 1 M -27.97%
Largest (AUM) IWR 0.19% $20.7 B 1 M -4.53%
Most Liquid (Volume) ARKK 0.75% $8.4 B 2 M 80.98%
Top YTD Performer ARKK 0.75% $8.4 B 2 M 80.98%

Top 15 Holdings

Concentration Analysis

This section compares how balanced and deep this ETF is relative to the peer group ETFdb.com Category.

1492
Number of Holdings
25.02%
% Assets in Top 10
30.00%
% Assets in Top 15
50.42%
% Assets in Top 50
Number of Holdings
1492

% Assets in Top 10
25.02%

% Assets in Top 15
30.00%

% Assets in Top 50
50.42%

Sector Breakdown

Asset Percentage
Common equity 100.0%
Sector Percentage
Technology 25.65%
Healthcare 13.83%
Consumer, Cyclical 11.33%
Communications 9.95%
Financials 9.92%
Industrials 8.48%
Consumer, Non-Cyclical 6.76%
Other 3.77%
Real Estate 3.09%
Utilities 2.87%
Energy 2.22%
Basic Materials 2.12%
Market Cap Percentage
Large cap 83.84%
Mid cap 9.72%
Small cap 4.51%
Micro cap 1.92%
Unknown 0.01%
Region Percentage
North America 97.9%
Europe 2.05%
Middle East 0.03%
Latin America 0.02%
Asia 0.01%
Asia-Pacific 0.0%
Region Percentage
United States 97.88%
Developed Markets (ex-US) 2.09%
Emerging Markets 0.01%
Not-designated 0.01%
Country Percentage
United States 97.88%
United Kingdom 0.94%
Ireland 0.73%
Germany 0.22%
Switzerland 0.15%
Israel 0.03%
Canada 0.02%
Puerto Rico 0.01%
Thailand 0.01%
Singapore 0.0%
Mexico 0.0%
Netherlands 0.0%
Brazil 0.0%
Asset Percentage
Common equity 100.0%

SPTM Valuation

This section shows how the P/E multiple of this ETF compares to the peer group ETFdb.com Category.

P/E Ratio
23.88

SPTM Dividend

This section shows how the dividend yield of this ETF compares to the peer group ETFdb.com Category.

Dividend
$0.17
Dividend Date
2020-06-22
Annual Dividend Rate
$0.94

$0.17
Dividend
2020-06-22
Dividend Date
$0.94
Annual Dividend Rate
Annual Dividend Yield
2.31%

SPTM Fund Flows

View charts featuring ETF fund flow data.

5 Day Net Flows: 59.17 K 1 Month Net Flows: -48.47 M 3 Month Net Flows: -20.62 M 6 Month Net Flows: -116.19 M 1 Year Net Flows: -442.76 M 3 Year Net Flows: 2.4 B 5 Year Net Flows: 2.4 B 10 Year Net Flows: 2.4 B

Realtime Rating

The adjacent table gives investors an individual Realtime Rating for SPTM on several different metrics, including liquidity, expenses, performance, volatility, dividend, concentration of holdings in addition to an overall rating. The "A+ Metric Rated ETF" field, available to ETFdb Pro members, shows the ETF in the All Cap Equities with the highest Metric Realtime Rating for each individual field. To view all of this data, sign up for a free 14-day trial for ETFdb Pro. To view information on how the ETFdb Realtime Ratings work, click here.

Metric Metric Realtime Rating A+ Metric Rated ETF
Liquidity n/a n/a
Expenses n/a n/a
Performance
Volatility
Dividend
Concentration

A+ Overall Rated ETF:

SPTM Expenses & Fees

This section compares the cost efficiency of this ETF to peers in the same ETFdb.com Category.

Expenses Ratio Analysis

ETF Average
0.535%
ETF Wtd. Average
0.19%
Category Average
0.54%
Expense Ratio
0.03%
ESG Themes and Scores
6.44/10
ESG Score
67.31%
Global Percentile
52.98%
Peer Percentile
    • Revenue Exposure to Environmental Impact (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Severe Environment Controversies (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Sustainable Impact Solutions (%)
      6.01%
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Weighted Average Carbon Intensity (Tons of CO2e / $M Sales)
      151.72
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Fossil Fuel Reserves (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • High Impact Fossil Fuel Reserves (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Water Stress High Risk Business Segment (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Water Stress High Risk Geography (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Water Stress Exposure Moderate (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Water Stress Exposure High (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Water Stress Exposure Low (%)
      Higher improves ESG score
    • Revenue Exposure to Energy Efficiency (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Revenue Exposure to Alternative Energy (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Revenue Exposure to Green Building (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Revenue Exposure to Pollution Prevention (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Revenue Exposure to Water Sustainability (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Revenue Exposure to Social Impact (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Sustainable Impact Solutions (%)
      6.01%
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • SRI Exclusion Criteria (%)
      10.85%
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Revenue Exposure to Affordable Real Estate (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Revenue Exposure to Education (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Revenue Exposure to Major Disease Treatment (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Revenue Exposure to Nutrition (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Revenue Exposure to Sanitation (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Revenue Exposure to SME Finance (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Human Rights Norms Violation (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Human Rights Norms Violation OR Watch List (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Severe Human Rights Controversies (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Labor Norms Violation (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Labor Norms Violation OR Watch List (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Severe Labor Controversies (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Severe Customer Controversies (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Global Compact Compliance Violation (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Global Compact Compliance Violation OR Watch List (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Catholic Values Fail (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Islamic Non-Compliant (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Adult Entertainment Involvement (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Alcohol Involvement (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Gambling Involvement (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Nuclear Power Involvement (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Tobacco Involvement (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Weapons Involvement (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Controversies Weapons Involvement (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Civilian Firearms Involvement (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Civilian Firearms Retailer (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Civilian Firearms Producer (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Direct Predatory Lending Involvement (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Genetic Engineering Involvement (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Severe Governance Controversies (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Board Flag (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Lack of Independent Board Majority (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Board Independence (0-25%) (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Board Independence (25-50%) (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Board Independence (50-75%) (%)
      Higher improves ESG score
    • Board Independence (75-100%) (%)
      Higher improves ESG score
    • No Female Directors (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Three OR More Female Directors (%)
      Higher improves ESG score
    • Females Represent 30% of Directors (%)
      Higher improves ESG score
    • Entrenched Board (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Overboarding (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Negative Director Votes (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Ownership AND Control Flag (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • One Share One Vote (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • No Annual Director Elections (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Does Not Use Majority Voting (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Significant Votes Against Pay Practices (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Controlling Shareholder (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Controlling Shareholder Concerns (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Cross Shareholdings (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Poison Pill (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Pay Flag (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • No Pay Performance Link (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Lack of Internal Pay Equity (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Executive Pay Non-Disclosure (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Accounting Flag (%)
      Lower improves ESG score

SPTM Performance

This section shows how this ETF has performed relative to its peer group ETFdb.com Category.

-3.46%
1 Week Return
-4.80%
4 Week Return
4.94%
13 Week Return
47.78%
26 Week Return
1.98%
Year to Date Return
10.52%
1 Year Return
36.36%
3 Year Return
78.95%
5 Year Return
1 Week Return
-3.46%

4 Week Return
-4.80%

13 Week Return
4.94%

26 Week Return
47.78%

Year to Date Return
1.98%

1 Year Return
10.52%

3 Year Return
36.36%

5 Year Return
78.95%

SPTM Price and Volume Chart

SPTM Technicals

Volatility Analysis

This section shows how the volatility of this ETF compares to the peer group ETFdb.com Category.

5 Day Volatility
261.55%
Rank
25 of 89

20 Day Volatility
22.23%
Rank
39 of 88

50 Day Volatility
16.48%
Rank
66 of 86

200 Day Volatility
21.27%
Rank
75 of 81

Beta
1.03
Rank
69 of 86

Standard Deviation
3.08%
Rank
55 of 78

Technicals

  • 20 Day MA $41.72
  • 60 Day MA $40.37
  • MACD 15 Period -1.61
  • MACD 100 Period 1.02
  • Williams % Range 10 Day 76.74
  • Williams % Range 20 Day 86.49
  • RSI 10 Day 33
  • RSI 20 Day 43
  • RSI 30 Day 48
  • Ultimate Oscillator 46

Bollinger Brands

  • Lower Bollinger (10 Day) $39.93
  • Upper Bollinger (10 Day) $42.04
  • Lower Bollinger (20 Day) $39.93
  • Upper Bollinger (20 Day) $43.52
  • Lower Bollinger (30 Day) $40.02
  • Upper Bollinger (30 Day) $43.10

Support & Resistance

  • Support Level 1 $39.50
  • Support Level 2 $39.09
  • Resistance Level 1 $40.11
  • Resistance Level 2 $40.31

Stochastic

  • Stochastic Oscillator %D (1 Day) 59.94
  • Stochastic Oscillator %D (5 Day) 35.33
  • Stochastic Oscillator %K (1 Day) 46.96
  • Stochastic Oscillator %K (5 Day) 42.30

Fact Sheet

Fact sheets are issued by the ETF provider and framed by ETFdb.com. Information contained within the fact sheet is not guaranteed to be timely or accurate.

Brought to You by ETF Flows


Source: LSEG Information Services (US), Inc. (“LSEG”) © LSEG 2016. All rights in the XTF data, ratings and / or underlying data contained in this communication (“the XTF information”) vest in LSEG and/or its licensors. Neither LSEG nor its licensors accept any liability arising out of the use of, reliance on or any errors or omissions in the XTF information. No further distribution of the XTF information is permitted without LSEG’s express written consent. LSEG does not promote, sponsor or endorse the content of this communication.

Copyright MSCI ESG Research LLC [2018]. All Rights Reserved. MSCI ESG Research LLC’s (“MSCI ESG”) Fund Metrics products (the “Information”) provide environmental, social and governance data with respect to underlying securities within more than 23,000 multi-asset class Mutual Funds and ETFs globally. MSCI ESG is a Registered Investment Adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. MSCI ESG materials have not been submitted, to nor received approval from, the US SEC or any other regulatory body. None of the information constitutes an offer to buy or sell, or a promotion or recommendation of, any security, financial instrument or product or trading strategy, nor should it be taken as an indication or guarantee of any future performance, analysis, forecast or prediction. None of the Information can be used to determine which securities to buy or sell or when to buy or sell them. The Information is provided “as is” and the user of the Information assumes the entire risk of any use it may make or permit to be made of the Information. All Information is provided solely for your internal use, and may not be reproduced or redisseminated in any form without express prior written permission from MSCI. Neither MSCI ESG nor any of its affiliates or any third party involved in or related to creating any Information makes any express or implied warranties, representations or guarantees, and in no event will MSCI ESG or any such affiliate or third party have any liability for any direct, indirect, special, punitive, consequential or any other damages (including lost profits) relating to any Information. More information on MSCI ESG Fund Metrics, provided by MSCI ESG Research LLC, can be found at https://www.msci.com/esg-fund-metrics.
© 2020 Market data provided is at least 15-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions.

Information is provided 'as is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use, please see disclaimer.