Are you getting the best rate from your broker?
Compare your broker's rates now to find out if you can save money

Choose your broker below
Welcome to ETFdb.com. Please help us personalize your experience.

Select the one that best describes you

IWP
iShares Russell Midcap Growth ETF

Price: $194.68
Change: $2.83 (0.01%)
Category: All Cap Equities
Last Updated:

Vitals

Investment Themes

Trading Data

Open - Volume -
Day Lo - Day Hi -
  • Open
  • Volume
  • Day Lo
  • Day Hi
  • 52 Week Lo $101.49
  • 52 Week Hi $194.68
  • AUM $14,159.2 M
  • Shares 74.4 M

Analyst Report

This ETF offers exposure to mid cap stocks that exhibit growth characteristics, making IWP a potentially useful tool for investors looking to fine tune their domestic equity exposure or implement a tilt towards a specific investment style. Investors constructing a long-term portfolio would be better off with a fund such as MDY or IJH that includes greater depth of holdings and a mix of various styles. Growth strategies often come with biases towards specific sectors, and may outperform more broadly-based indexes in certain economic environments. It should be noted that there is often considerable overlap between IWP and its value counterpart IWS, the result of a methodology that uses a generous definition of growth stocks. Rydex offers a pure style alternative, RFG, that is slightly more expensive but will offer a considerably more targeted focus on growth equities. Those seeking to make a meaningful tilt in their portfolio would be better served by using that fund. It should also be noted that IJK and IVOG seek to replicate the same index at comparable expense ratios. VOT is slightly cheaper, and may be available commission free in certain accounts, while IWP will generally feature narrow spreads. IWP is a fine ETF, but there are a number of alternatives out there that offer more compelling methodologies, lower fees, or potentially better execution.

Historical Trading Data

  • 1 Month Avg. Volume 397,961
  • 3 Month Avg. Volume 377,391

Alternative ETFs in the All Cap Equities Category

Type Symbol Expense Ratio Assets Avg. Daily Vol YTD Return
Cheapest SPTM 0.03% $4.0 B 423,432 14.86%
Largest (AUM) IWR 0.19% $23.8 B 1 M 12.55%
Most Liquid (Volume) ARKK 0.75% $12.3 B 2 M 123.34%
Top YTD Performer QCLN 0.60% $1.5 B 466,518 162.72%

Top 15 Holdings

Concentration Analysis

This section compares how balanced and deep this ETF is relative to the peer group ETFdb.com Category.

342
Number of Holdings
11.80%
% Assets in Top 10
17.04%
% Assets in Top 15
43.85%
% Assets in Top 50
Number of Holdings
342

% Assets in Top 10
11.80%

% Assets in Top 15
17.04%

% Assets in Top 50
43.85%

Sector Breakdown

Asset Percentage
Common equity 99.86%
ETF Cash Component 0.14%
Sector Percentage
Technology 29.43%
Healthcare 20.34%
Other 13.46%
Industrials 11.84%
Consumer, Cyclical 11.8%
Consumer, Non-Cyclical 3.88%
Financials 3.1%
Communications 2.14%
Basic Materials 2.07%
Real Estate 1.31%
Energy 0.4%
ETF Cash Component 0.14%
Utilities 0.09%
Market Cap Percentage
Mid cap 48.18%
Large cap 45.14%
Small cap 6.44%
ETF Cash Component 0.14%
Micro cap 0.1%
Region Percentage
North America 97.93%
Europe 1.45%
Middle East 0.4%
ETF Cash Component 0.14%
Asia 0.05%
Asia-Pacific 0.01%
Latin America 0.01%
Region Percentage
United States 97.92%
Developed Markets (ex-US) 1.88%
ETF Cash Component 0.14%
Emerging Markets 0.06%
Country Percentage
United States 97.92%
Luxembourg 1.12%
Israel 0.4%
United Kingdom 0.32%
ETF Cash Component 0.14%
China 0.05%
Canada 0.02%
New Zealand 0.01%
Brazil 0.01%
Asset Percentage
Common equity 99.86%
ETF Cash Component 0.14%

IWP Valuation

This section shows how the P/E multiple of this ETF compares to the peer group ETFdb.com Category.

P/E Ratio
34.27

IWP Dividend

This section shows how the dividend yield of this ETF compares to the peer group ETFdb.com Category.

Dividend
$0.21
Dividend Date
2020-09-23
Annual Dividend Rate
$0.88

$0.21
Dividend
2020-09-23
Dividend Date
$0.88
Annual Dividend Rate
Annual Dividend Yield
0.46%

IWP Fund Flows

View charts featuring ETF fund flow data.

5 Day Net Flows: -47.61 M 1 Month Net Flows: -235.8 M 3 Month Net Flows: -439.21 M 6 Month Net Flows: -538.15 M 1 Year Net Flows: -243.02 M 3 Year Net Flows: 337.37 M 5 Year Net Flows: 804.41 M 10 Year Net Flows: 1.85 B

Realtime Rating

The adjacent table gives investors an individual Realtime Rating for IWP on several different metrics, including liquidity, expenses, performance, volatility, dividend, concentration of holdings in addition to an overall rating. The "A+ Metric Rated ETF" field, available to ETFdb Pro members, shows the ETF in the All Cap Equities with the highest Metric Realtime Rating for each individual field. To view all of this data, sign up for a free 14-day trial for ETFdb Pro. To view information on how the ETFdb Realtime Ratings work, click here.

Metric Metric Realtime Rating A+ Metric Rated ETF
Liquidity A+ n/a
Expenses A- n/a
Performance
Volatility
Dividend
Concentration

A+ Overall Rated ETF:

IWP Expenses & Fees

This section compares the cost efficiency of this ETF to peers in the same ETFdb.com Category.

Expenses Ratio Analysis

ETF Average
0.534%
ETF Wtd. Average
-0.13%
Category Average
0.53%
Expense Ratio
0.24%
ESG Themes and Scores
4.89/10
ESG Score
29.8%
Global Percentile
70.15%
Peer Percentile
    • Revenue Exposure to Environmental Impact (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Severe Environment Controversies (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Sustainable Impact Solutions (%)
      7.43%
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Weighted Average Carbon Intensity (Tons of CO2e / $M Sales)
      36.3
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Fossil Fuel Reserves (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • High Impact Fossil Fuel Reserves (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Water Stress High Risk Business Segment (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Water Stress High Risk Geography (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Water Stress Exposure Moderate (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Water Stress Exposure High (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Water Stress Exposure Low (%)
      Higher improves ESG score
    • Revenue Exposure to Energy Efficiency (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Revenue Exposure to Alternative Energy (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Revenue Exposure to Green Building (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Revenue Exposure to Pollution Prevention (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Revenue Exposure to Water Sustainability (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Revenue Exposure to Social Impact (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Sustainable Impact Solutions (%)
      7.43%
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • SRI Exclusion Criteria (%)
      2.03%
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Revenue Exposure to Affordable Real Estate (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Revenue Exposure to Education (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Revenue Exposure to Major Disease Treatment (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Revenue Exposure to Nutrition (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Revenue Exposure to Sanitation (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Revenue Exposure to SME Finance (%)
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Human Rights Norms Violation (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Human Rights Norms Violation OR Watch List (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Severe Human Rights Controversies (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Labor Norms Violation (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Labor Norms Violation OR Watch List (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Severe Labor Controversies (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Severe Customer Controversies (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Global Compact Compliance Violation (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Global Compact Compliance Violation OR Watch List (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Catholic Values Fail (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Islamic Non-Compliant (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Adult Entertainment Involvement (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Alcohol Involvement (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Gambling Involvement (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Nuclear Power Involvement (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Tobacco Involvement (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Weapons Involvement (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Controversies Weapons Involvement (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Civilian Firearms Involvement (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Civilian Firearms Retailer (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Civilian Firearms Producer (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Direct Predatory Lending Involvement (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Genetic Engineering Involvement (%)
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Severe Governance Controversies (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Board Flag (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Lack of Independent Board Majority (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Board Independence (0-25%) (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Board Independence (25-50%) (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Board Independence (50-75%) (%)
      Higher improves ESG score
    • Board Independence (75-100%) (%)
      Higher improves ESG score
    • No Female Directors (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Three OR More Female Directors (%)
      Higher improves ESG score
    • Females Represent 30% of Directors (%)
      Higher improves ESG score
    • Entrenched Board (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Overboarding (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Negative Director Votes (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Ownership AND Control Flag (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • One Share One Vote (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • No Annual Director Elections (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Does Not Use Majority Voting (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Significant Votes Against Pay Practices (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Controlling Shareholder (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Controlling Shareholder Concerns (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Cross Shareholdings (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Poison Pill (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Pay Flag (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • No Pay Performance Link (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Lack of Internal Pay Equity (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Executive Pay Non-Disclosure (%)
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Accounting Flag (%)
      Lower improves ESG score

IWP Performance

This section shows how this ETF has performed relative to its peer group ETFdb.com Category.

2.54%
1 Week Return
12.48%
4 Week Return
11.39%
13 Week Return
26.23%
26 Week Return
28.15%
Year to Date Return
28.87%
1 Year Return
67.42%
3 Year Return
114.61%
5 Year Return
1 Week Return
2.54%

4 Week Return
12.48%

13 Week Return
11.39%

26 Week Return
26.23%

Year to Date Return
28.15%

1 Year Return
28.87%

3 Year Return
67.42%

5 Year Return
114.61%

IWP Price and Volume Chart

IWP Technicals

Volatility Analysis

This section shows how the volatility of this ETF compares to the peer group ETFdb.com Category.

5 Day Volatility
194.40%
Rank
28 of 96

20 Day Volatility
22.56%
Rank
58 of 95

50 Day Volatility
20.41%
Rank
69 of 95

200 Day Volatility
20.90%
Rank
53 of 92

Beta
1.09
Rank
54 of 95

Standard Deviation
18.59%
Rank
4 of 85

Technicals

  • 20 Day MA $186.36
  • 60 Day MA $178.62
  • MACD 15 Period 6.13
  • MACD 100 Period 19.61
  • Williams % Range 10 Day n/a
  • Williams % Range 20 Day n/a
  • RSI 10 Day 72
  • RSI 20 Day 65
  • RSI 30 Day 63
  • Ultimate Oscillator 55

Bollinger Brands

  • Lower Bollinger (10 Day) $185.34
  • Upper Bollinger (10 Day) $193.86
  • Lower Bollinger (20 Day) $175.58
  • Upper Bollinger (20 Day) $197.03
  • Lower Bollinger (30 Day) $174.19
  • Upper Bollinger (30 Day) $195.10

Support & Resistance

  • Support Level 1 $193.47
  • Support Level 2 $192.25
  • Resistance Level 1 $195.29
  • Resistance Level 2 $195.89

Stochastic

  • Stochastic Oscillator %D (1 Day) 70.34
  • Stochastic Oscillator %D (5 Day) 87.22
  • Stochastic Oscillator %K (1 Day) 58.14
  • Stochastic Oscillator %K (5 Day) 79.25

Fact Sheet

Fact sheets are issued by the ETF provider and framed by ETFdb.com. Information contained within the fact sheet is not guaranteed to be timely or accurate.

Disclosures

Copyright © 2020 FactSet Research Systems Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright MSCI ESG Research LLC [2018]. All Rights Reserved. MSCI ESG Research LLC’s (“MSCI ESG”) Fund Metrics products (the “Information”) provide environmental, social and governance data with respect to underlying securities within more than 23,000 multi-asset class Mutual Funds and ETFs globally. MSCI ESG is a Registered Investment Adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. MSCI ESG materials have not been submitted, to nor received approval from, the US SEC or any other regulatory body. None of the information constitutes an offer to buy or sell, or a promotion or recommendation of, any security, financial instrument or product or trading strategy, nor should it be taken as an indication or guarantee of any future performance, analysis, forecast or prediction. None of the Information can be used to determine which securities to buy or sell or when to buy or sell them. The Information is provided “as is” and the user of the Information assumes the entire risk of any use it may make or permit to be made of the Information. All Information is provided solely for your internal use, and may not be reproduced or redisseminated in any form without express prior written permission from MSCI. Neither MSCI ESG nor any of its affiliates or any third party involved in or related to creating any Information makes any express or implied warranties, representations or guarantees, and in no event will MSCI ESG or any such affiliate or third party have any liability for any direct, indirect, special, punitive, consequential or any other damages (including lost profits) relating to any Information. More information on MSCI ESG Fund Metrics, provided by MSCI ESG Research LLC, can be found at https://www.msci.com/esg-fund-metrics.
© 2020 Market data provided is at least 15-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions.

Information is provided 'as is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use, please see disclaimer.