Are you getting the best rate from your broker?
Compare your broker's rates now to find out if you can save money
Choose your broker below
Welcome to ETFdb.com. Please help us personalize your experience.
Select the one that best describes you

LQD
iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF

Price: $134.62
Change: $0.34 (0.0%)
Category: Corporate Bonds
Last Updated:

Vitals

Investment Themes

Trading Data

Open - Volume -
Day Lo - Day Hi -
  • Open
  • Volume
  • Day Lo
  • Day Hi
  • 52 Week Lo $103.26
  • 52 Week Hi $138.78
  • AUM $56,486.1 M
  • Shares 420.6 M

Analyst Report

This ETF is the most popular option for investors looking to gain exposure to investment grade corporate bonds, making it a useful tool for those looking to access a corner of the bond market that should be a core component of any long-term, buy-and-hold portfolio. LQD is probably of limited use for short term traders, who will prefer to utilize more extreme ends of the risk spectrum to capitalize off of short term movements in asset prices and risk tolerance. This ETF should, however, be very useful to those building a long-term portfolio; exposure to corporate bonds can deliver attractive yields without excessive risks. LQD can specifically be helpful for those with holdings in AGG or BND, beefing up the relatively minor allocations those aggregate products make to corporate debt (those ETFs are dominated by government bonds). While LQD is spread out across the maturity spectrum, investors do have options for more granular exposure to long term (VCLT) or short term (SCPB, VCSH) corporate debt.

LQD is extremely cost efficient, and offers an impressively deep underlying portfolio of fixed income securities. But there are some interesting alternatives out there that may make more sense for certain investors. CBND, for example, offers similar exposure but uses a unique weighting methodology that may be more appealing. Whereas LQD gives the largest weightings to the biggest issues of debt, CBND uses fundamental factors such as return on assets and interest coverage ratio to determine the weightings assigned.

Historical Trading Data

  • 1 Month Avg. Volume 11,818,957
  • 3 Month Avg. Volume 11,302,687

Alternative ETFs in the Corporate Bonds Category

Type Symbol Expense Ratio Assets Avg. Daily Vol YTD Return
Cheapest VCIT 0.05% $39.8 B 2 M 7.11%
Largest (AUM) VCIT 0.05% $39.8 B 2 M 7.11%
Most Liquid (Volume) VCIT 0.05% $39.8 B 2 M 7.11%
Top YTD Performer LKOR 0.22% $46.5 M 3,511 10.00%

Top 15 Holdings

Concentration Analysis

This section compares how balanced and deep this ETF is relative to the peer group ETFdb.com Category.

2323
Number of Holdings
3.94%
% Assets in Top 10
4.85%
% Assets in Top 15
9.68%
% Assets in Top 50
 
View Detailed Analysis
 
Number of Holdings
2323
Rank
7 of 81
Low
IGBH (2)
High
USIG (7527)
% Assets in Top 10
3.94%
Rank
6 of 81
Low
USIG (2.31%)
High
LQDH (100.00%)
% Assets in Top 15
4.85%
Rank
76 of 81
Low
USIG (2.71%)
High
LDSF (100.00%)
% Assets in Top 50
9.68%
Rank
77 of 81
Low
USIG (4.87%)
High
FLUD (100.00%)

 
View Summary Analysis
 

Sector Breakdown

Asset Percentage
Corporate debt 98.58%
ETF Cash Component 1.42%
Bond Sector Percentage
Corporate 98.58%
ETF Cash Component 1.42%
Maturity Percentage
Less Than 1 Year 0.0%
1-3 Years 0.03%
3-5 Years 16.41%
5-7 Years 17.71%
7-10 Years 19.41%
10-15 Years 5.65%
15-20 Years 9.6%
20-30 Years 25.42%
30+ Years 4.35%
ETF Cash Component 1.42%
 
View Less Charts
 
Asset Percentage
Corporate debt 98.58%
ETF Cash Component 1.42%
 
View More Charts
 

LQD Valuation

This section shows how the P/E multiple of this ETF compares to the peer group ETFdb.com Category.

P/E Ratio
No Ranking Available
Rank
N/A
Low
N/A
High
N/A

LQD Dividend

This section shows how the dividend yield of this ETF compares to the peer group ETFdb.com Category.

Dividend
$0.29
Dividend Date
2020-10-01
Annual Dividend Rate
$3.86

$0.29
Dividend
2020-10-01
Dividend Date
$3.86
Annual Dividend Rate
Annual Dividend Yield
2.88%
Rank
21 of 80
Low
VCEB (0.04%)
High
IG (5.67%)

LQD Fund Flows

View charts featuring ETF fund flow data.

5 Day Net Flows: 295.81 M 1 Month Net Flows: 326.21 M 3 Month Net Flows: 270.86 M 6 Month Net Flows: 8.13 B 1 Year Net Flows: 17.32 B 3 Year Net Flows: 12.19 B 5 Year Net Flows: 25.87 B 10 Year Net Flows: 34.74 B

Realtime Rating

The adjacent table shows a Realtime Rating for several different metrics, including liquidity, expenses, performance, volatility, dividend, concentration of holdings in addition to an overall rating. The "A+ Metric Rated ETF" field, available to ETFdb Pro members, highlights the best rated ETF in the Corporate Bonds category for each metric. To view information on how the ETFdb Realtime Ratings work, click here.

Metric Metric Realtime Rating A+ Metric Rated ETF
Liquidity A+ n/a
Expenses B+ n/a
Performance B- n/a
Volatility B- n/a
Dividend A- n/a
Concentration A n/a

A+ Overall Rated ETF: IBDR

LQD Expenses & Fees

This section compares the cost efficiency of this ETF to peers in the same ETFdb.com Category.

Expenses Ratio Analysis

ETF Average
0.535%
ETF Wtd. Average
0.18%
Category Average
0.19%
Expense Ratio
0.15%
Rank
44 of 79
Low
VCSH (0.05%)
High
LDSF (0.82%)
ESG Themes and Scores
5.24/10
ESG Score
34.26%
Global Percentile
45.63%
Peer Percentile
Environmental
Social
Governance
  • Environmental Scores
    • Revenue Exposure to Environmental Impact (%)
      1.22%
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Severe Environment Controversies (%)
      4.54%
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Sustainable Impact Solutions (%)
      2.97%
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    Carbon Intensity
    • Weighted Average Carbon Intensity (Tons of CO2e / $M Sales)
      145.24
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    Fossil Fuel Reserves
    • Fossil Fuel Reserves (%)
      6.77%
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • High Impact Fossil Fuel Reserves (%)
      6.74%
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    Water Stress
    • Water Stress High Risk Business Segment (%)
      8.57%
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Water Stress High Risk Geography (%)
      67.51%
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Water Stress Exposure Moderate (%)
      29.7%
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Water Stress Exposure High (%)
      10.86%
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Water Stress Exposure Low (%)
      56.95%
      Higher improves ESG score
    Energy Efficiency
    • Revenue Exposure to Energy Efficiency (%)
      0.79%
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    Alternative Energy
    • Revenue Exposure to Alternative Energy (%)
      0.18%
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    Green Building
    • Revenue Exposure to Green Building (%)
      0.17%
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    Pollution Prevention
    • Revenue Exposure to Pollution Prevention (%)
      0.04%
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    Water Sustainability
    • Revenue Exposure to Water Sustainability (%)
      0.02%
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
  • Social Scores
    • Revenue Exposure to Social Impact (%)
      1.75%
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Sustainable Impact Solutions (%)
      2.97%
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • SRI Exclusion Criteria (%)
      10.81%
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    Affordable Real Estate
    • Revenue Exposure to Affordable Real Estate (%)
      0.05%
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    Education
    • Revenue Exposure to Education (%)
      0.0%
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    Major Disease Treatment
    • Revenue Exposure to Major Disease Treatment (%)
      1.19%
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    Healthy Nutrition
    • Revenue Exposure to Nutrition (%)
      0.25%
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    Global Sanitation
    • Revenue Exposure to Sanitation (%)
      0.17%
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    SME Finance
    • Revenue Exposure to SME Finance (%)
      0.09%
      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    Human Rights Violations
    • Human Rights Norms Violation (%)
      1.98%
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Human Rights Norms Violation OR Watch List (%)
      23.47%
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Severe Human Rights Controversies (%)
      6.24%
      Lower improves ESG score
    Labor Rights Violations
    • Labor Norms Violation (%)
      0.8%
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Labor Norms Violation OR Watch List (%)
      19.23%
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Severe Labor Controversies (%)
      29.56%
      Lower improves ESG score
    Customer Controversies
    • Severe Customer Controversies (%)
      31.15%
      Lower improves ESG score
    UN Principles Violations
    • Global Compact Compliance Violation (%)
      2.9%
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Global Compact Compliance Violation OR Watch List (%)
      18.11%
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    Catholic Values
    • Catholic Values Fail (%)
      21.88%
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    Sharia Compliant Investing
    • Islamic Non-Compliant (%)
      81.18%
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    Adult Entertainment
    • Adult Entertainment Involvement (%)
      10.99%
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    Alcohol
    • Alcohol Involvement (%)
      15.56%
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    Gambling
    • Gambling Involvement (%)
      8.54%
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    Nuclear Power
    • Nuclear Power Involvement (%)
      4.6%
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    Tobacco
    • Tobacco Involvement (%)
      10.93%
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    Weapons Involvement
    • Weapons Involvement (%)
      6.09%
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Controversies Weapons Involvement (%)
      1.62%
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    Firearms
    • Civilian Firearms Involvement (%)
      1.14%
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Civilian Firearms Retailer (%)
      0.8%
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Civilian Firearms Producer (%)
      0.34%
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    Predatory Lending
    • Direct Predatory Lending Involvement (%)
      1.11%
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    GMO Involvement
    • Genetic Engineering Involvement (%)
      1.53%
      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
  • Responsible Governance Score
    • Severe Governance Controversies (%)
      28.78%
      Lower improves ESG score
    Board Flag
    • Board Flag (%)
      11.03%
      Lower improves ESG score
    Board Independence
    • Lack of Independent Board Majority (%)
      5.31%
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Board Independence (0-25%) (%)
      0.0%
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Board Independence (25-50%) (%)
      4.65%
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Board Independence (50-75%) (%)
      13.34%
      Higher improves ESG score
    • Board Independence (75-100%) (%)
      61.11%
      Higher improves ESG score
    Board Diversity
    • No Female Directors (%)
      0.6%
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Three OR More Female Directors (%)
      80.91%
      Higher improves ESG score
    • Females Represent 30% of Directors (%)
      52.2%
      Higher improves ESG score
    Entrenched Board
    • Entrenched Board (%)
      16.47%
      Lower improves ESG score
    Overboarding
    • Overboarding (%)
      61.99%
      Lower improves ESG score
    Shareholder Rights
    • Negative Director Votes (%)
      35.76%
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Ownership AND Control Flag (%)
      18.83%
      Lower improves ESG score
    • One Share One Vote (%)
      11.54%
      Lower improves ESG score
    • No Annual Director Elections (%)
      5.9%
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Does Not Use Majority Voting (%)
      67.76%
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Significant Votes Against Pay Practices (%)
      32.15%
      Lower improves ESG score
    Fund Ownership
    • Controlling Shareholder (%)
      9.23%
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Controlling Shareholder Concerns (%)
      5.63%
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Cross Shareholdings (%)
      0.82%
      Lower improves ESG score
    Poison Pill
    • Poison Pill (%)
      0.83%
      Lower improves ESG score
    Executive Compensation
    • Pay Flag (%)
      0.44%
      Lower improves ESG score
    • No Pay Performance Link (%)
      4.55%
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Lack of Internal Pay Equity (%)
      19.92%
      Lower improves ESG score
    • Executive Pay Non-Disclosure (%)
      0.39%
      Lower improves ESG score
    Accounting Flags
    • Accounting Flag (%)
      41.21%
      Lower improves ESG score

LQD Performance

This section shows how this ETF has performed relative to its peer group ETFdb.com Category.

-0.53%
1 Week Return
0.52%
4 Week Return
-1.90%
13 Week Return
5.06%
26 Week Return
7.48%
Year to Date Return
8.81%
1 Year Return
22.79%
3 Year Return
32.74%
5 Year Return
 
View Detailed Analysis
 
1 Week Return
-0.53%
Rank
70 of 78
Low
VCLT (-1.00%)
High
IBND (1.14%)
4 Week Return
0.52%
Rank
19 of 81
Low
FLDR (-0.07%)
High
IGBH (3.15%)
13 Week Return
-1.90%
Rank
72 of 79
Low
VCLT (-4.35%)
High
IBND (3.23%)
26 Week Return
5.06%
Rank
36 of 76
Low
ICSH (1.08%)
High
IBND (14.62%)
Year to Date Return
7.48%
Rank
10 of 75
Low
IGBH (-4.57%)
High
LKOR (10.00%)
1 Year Return
8.81%
Rank
8 of 74
Low
ESCR (-1.27%)
High
LKOR (11.91%)
3 Year Return
22.79%
Rank
5 of 57
Low
IGBH (1.53%)
High
LKOR (29.63%)
5 Year Return
32.74%
Rank
7 of 43
Low
FLOT (9.31%)
High
VCLT (48.84%)

 
View Summary Analysis
 

LQD Price and Volume Chart

LQD Technicals

Volatility Analysis

This section shows how the volatility of this ETF compares to the peer group ETFdb.com Category.

 
View Detailed Analysis
 
5 Day Volatility
80.54%
Rank
24 of 81
Low
FLUD (0.24%)
High
LKOR (166.28%)
20 Day Volatility
3.85%
Rank
15 of 81
Low
RAVI (0.33%)
High
EMCB (16.58%)
50 Day Volatility
5.21%
Rank
10 of 79
Low
ICSH (0.33%)
High
EMCB (15.21%)
200 Day Volatility
5.99%
Rank
10 of 76
Low
ICSH (0.35%)
High
EMCB (12.90%)
Beta
0.2
Rank
29 of 77
Low
ICSH (0.02)
High
IGBH (0.5)
Standard Deviation
5.86%
Rank
1 of 74
Low
LDSF (0.30%)
High
LQD (5.86%)

 
View Summary Analysis
 

Technicals

  • 20 Day MA $134.84
  • 60 Day MA $135.44
  • MACD 15 Period -0.29
  • MACD 100 Period -0.29
  • Williams % Range 10 Day 73.56
  • Williams % Range 20 Day 65.64
  • RSI 10 Day 44
  • RSI 20 Day 47
  • RSI 30 Day 49
  • Ultimate Oscillator 34

Bollinger Brands

  • Lower Bollinger (10 Day) $134.18
  • Upper Bollinger (10 Day) $136.11
  • Lower Bollinger (20 Day) $133.91
  • Upper Bollinger (20 Day) $135.78
  • Lower Bollinger (30 Day) $133.87
  • Upper Bollinger (30 Day) $136.03

Support & Resistance

  • Support Level 1 $134.37
  • Support Level 2 $134.12
  • Resistance Level 1 $134.80
  • Resistance Level 2 $134.98

Stochastic

  • Stochastic Oscillator %D (1 Day) 41.24
  • Stochastic Oscillator %D (5 Day) 24.45
  • Stochastic Oscillator %K (1 Day) 32.67
  • Stochastic Oscillator %K (5 Day) 30.50

Fact Sheet

Fact sheets are issued by the ETF provider and framed by ETFdb.com. Information contained within the fact sheet is not guaranteed to be timely or accurate.

Download the fact sheet PDF

Disclosures

Copyright © 2020 FactSet Research Systems Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright MSCI ESG Research LLC [2018]. All Rights Reserved. MSCI ESG Research LLC’s (“MSCI ESG”) Fund Metrics products (the “Information”) provide environmental, social and governance data with respect to underlying securities within more than 23,000 multi-asset class Mutual Funds and ETFs globally. MSCI ESG is a Registered Investment Adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. MSCI ESG materials have not been submitted, to nor received approval from, the US SEC or any other regulatory body. None of the information constitutes an offer to buy or sell, or a promotion or recommendation of, any security, financial instrument or product or trading strategy, nor should it be taken as an indication or guarantee of any future performance, analysis, forecast or prediction. None of the Information can be used to determine which securities to buy or sell or when to buy or sell them. The Information is provided “as is” and the user of the Information assumes the entire risk of any use it may make or permit to be made of the Information. All Information is provided solely for your internal use, and may not be reproduced or redisseminated in any form without express prior written permission from MSCI. Neither MSCI ESG nor any of its affiliates or any third party involved in or related to creating any Information makes any express or implied warranties, representations or guarantees, and in no event will MSCI ESG or any such affiliate or third party have any liability for any direct, indirect, special, punitive, consequential or any other damages (including lost profits) relating to any Information. More information on MSCI ESG Fund Metrics, provided by MSCI ESG Research LLC, can be found at https://www.msci.com/esg-fund-metrics.
© 2020 Market data provided is at least 15-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions.

Information is provided 'as is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use, please see disclaimer.
Help & Info
Tools
More Tools
Explore ETFs
Legal