Are you getting the best rate from your broker?
Compare your broker's rates now to find out if you can save money

Choose your broker below
Welcome to ETFdb.com. Please help us personalize your experience.

Select the one that best describes you
  • ETF
  • QQEW
    Pricing Data
    $68.16
    Change: $0.02 (-0.0%)
    Time: 09/13/19
    Previous Close: $68.18
  • Category
  • Large Cap Growth Equities
  • ESG Score
Last Updated:

Profile

Vitals

Trading Data

Open: - Volume -
Day Lo - Day Hi -
  • 52 Week Lo: $51.09
  • 52 Week Hi: $69.64
  • AUM: $688.3 M
  • Shares: 10.1 M

Investment Themes

Historical Trading Data

  • 1 Month Avg. Volume: 44,574
  • 3 Month Avg. Volume: 63,268

Alternative ETFs in the Large Cap Growth Equities Category

Type Ticker Expense Ratio Assets Avg. Daily Vol YTD Return
Cheapest SFY $55.3 M 31,923
Largest (AUM) SPY 0.09% $276,205.6 M 69,618,000 21.59%
Most Liquid (Volume) SPY 0.09% $276,205.6 M 69,618,000 21.59%
Top YTD Performer PRN 0.60% $107.2 M 11,392 31.52%

Analyst Report

This ETF offers exposure to one of the world's most widely-followed equity benchmarks, but with a twist; weighting each of the component securities equally. While QQQ is well known among investors, this ETF has some appeal to those constructing a long-term, balanced portfolio as its equal-weighting methodology mitigates some of the impact from the heavy tech weighting. However, the sheer number of tech companies in the Nasdaq ensures that even with this equal-weighting, the fund is heavily dependent on technology names. QQEW should be used by more long-term investors while traders should seek out the more liquid QQQ instead. QQQ has penny-wide spreads and can be a nice tool for those looking to quickly establish a position in U.S. equity markets. But investors building a retirement portfolio or maintaining a longer-term objective would be better served by looking at this often forgotten fund from First Trust instead if they are dead-set on obtaining broad exposure to the Nasdaq-100.

Realtime Rating

Sign Up for Pro to Unlock Data Sign Up

Realtime Rating Summary

The adjacent table gives investors an individual Realtime Rating for QQEW on several different metrics, including liquidity, expenses, performance, volatility, dividend, concentration of holdings in addition to an overall rating. The "A+ Metric Rated ETF" field, available to ETFdb Pro members, shows the ETF in the Large Cap Growth Equities with the highest Metric Realtime Rating for each individual field. To view all of this data, sign up for a free 14-day trial for ETFdb Pro. To view information on how the ETFdb Realtime Ratings work, click here.

Compare to another ETF

View the Category Report

QQEW Overall Realtime Rating:

A+ Overall Rated ETF:

Metric Metric Realtime Rating A+ Metric Rated ETF
Liquidity B+ n/a
Expenses C+ n/a
Performance
Volatility
Dividend
Concentration

QQEW In-Depth Analysis

The following tables and charts contain in-depth metrics for this ETF and compare it to similar peer ETFs within its ETFdb.com Category.

QQEW Holdings

Filings Data as of: Sep 13, 2019

Concentration Analysis

This section compares how balanced and deep this ETF is relative to the peer group ETFdb.com Category.

Number of Holdings
Rank: 135 of 230
104
Category Low RWUI (2)
Category High ITOT (3195)
% Assets in Top 10
Rank: 32 of 230
12.73%
Category Low EUSA (2.06%)
Category High FV (100.00%)
% Assets in Top 15
Rank: 196 of 230
18.29%
Category Low EUSA (2.99%)
Category High EQL (100.00%)
% Assets in Top 50
Rank: 154 of 230
54.53%
Category Low EUSA (9.29%)
Category High DIA (100.00%)

Asset Allocation

Asset Percentage
Common equity 99.82%
ETF Cash Component 0.18%

Sector Breakdown

Sector Percentage
Technology 37.43%
Consumer, Cyclical 15.56%
Healthcare 14.57%
Communications 13.27%
Industrials 8.1%
Consumer, Non-Cyclical 5.86%
Other 3.03%
Utilities 1.0%
Financials 0.99%
ETF Cash Component 0.18%

Market Cap Breakdown

Market Cap Percentage
Large cap 86.72%
Mid cap 13.1%
ETF Cash Component 0.18%

Region Breakdown

Region Percentage
North America 87.76%
Europe 6.49%
Asia 3.93%
Middle East 0.95%
Latin America 0.87%

Market Tier Breakdown

Region Percentage
United States 87.76%
Developed Markets (ex-US) 7.44%
Emerging Markets 4.8%

Country Breakdown

Country Percentage
United States 87.76%
China 3.93%
United Kingdom 3.17%
Netherlands 2.31%
Germany 1.01%
Israel 0.95%
Argentina 0.87%

QQEW Expenses & Fees

This section compares the cost efficiency of this ETF to peers in the same ETFdb.com Category.

Expenses Ratio Analysis

ETF Average
0.543%
ETF Wtd. Average
0.20%
Category Average
0.38%
Expense Ratio
Rank: 183 of 228
0.60%
Category Low BBUS (0.02%)
Category High GARD (1.29%)

Commission Free Trading

This ETF is not currently available for commission free trading on any platforms.

Category Commission Free Trading

There are 22 other ETFs in the Large Cap Growth Equities ETFdb.com Category that are also eligible for commission free trading:

QQEW ESG Themes and Scores
  • 4.53/10
    ESG Score
  • 29.34%
    ESG Score Global Percentile (%)
  • 15.51%
    ESG Score Peer Percentile (%)
    • Revenue Exposure to Environmental Impact (%)

      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Severe Environment Controversies (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Sustainable Impact Solutions (%)
      8.88%

      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Weighted Average Carbon Intensity (Tons of CO2e / $M Sales)
      101.75

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Fossil Fuel Reserves (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • High Impact Fossil Fuel Reserves (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Water Stress High Risk Business Segment (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Water Stress High Risk Geography (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Water Stress Exposure Moderate (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Water Stress Exposure High (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Water Stress Exposure Low (%)

      Higher improves ESG score
    • Revenue Exposure to Energy Efficiency (%)

      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Revenue Exposure to Alternative Energy (%)

      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Revenue Exposure to Green Building (%)

      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Revenue Exposure to Pollution Prevention (%)

      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Revenue Exposure to Water Sustainability (%)

      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Revenue Exposure to Social Impact (%)

      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Sustainable Impact Solutions (%)
      8.88%

      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • SRI Exclusion Criteria (%)
      2.97%

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Revenue Exposure to Affordable Real Estate (%)

      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Revenue Exposure to Education (%)

      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Revenue Exposure to Major Disease Treatment (%)

      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Revenue Exposure to Nutrition (%)

      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Revenue Exposure to Sanitation (%)

      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Revenue Exposure to SME Finance (%)

      Higher is better, no ESG score impact
    • Human Rights Norms Violation (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Human Rights Norms Violation OR Watch List (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Severe Human Rights Controversies (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Labor Norms Violation (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Labor Norms Violation OR Watch List (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Severe Labor Controversies (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Severe Customer Controversies (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Global Compact Compliance Violation (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Global Compact Compliance Violation OR Watch List (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Catholic Values Fail (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Islamic Non-Compliant (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Adult Entertainment Involvement (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Alcohol Involvement (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Gambling Involvement (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Nuclear Power Involvement (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Tobacco Involvement (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Weapons Involvement (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Controversies Weapons Involvement (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Civilian Firearms Involvement (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Civilian Firearms Retailer (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Civilian Firearms Producer (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Direct Predatory Lending Involvement (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Genetic Engineering Involvement (%)

      Higher is worse, no ESG score impact
    • Severe Governance Controversies (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Board Flag (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Lack of Independent Board Majority (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Board Independence (0-25%) (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Board Independence (25-50%) (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Board Independence (50-75%) (%)

      Higher improves ESG score
    • Board Independence (75-100%) (%)

      Higher improves ESG score
    • No Female Directors (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Three OR More Female Directors (%)

      Higher improves ESG score
    • Females Represent 30% of Directors (%)

      Higher improves ESG score
    • Entrenched Board (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Overboarding (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Negative Director Votes (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Ownership AND Control Flag (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • One Share One Vote (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • No Annual Director Elections (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Does Not Use Majority Voting (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Significant Votes Against Pay Practices (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Controlling Shareholder (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Controlling Shareholder Concerns (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Cross Shareholdings (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Poison Pill (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Pay Flag (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • No Pay Performance Link (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Lack of Internal Pay Equity (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Executive Pay Non-Disclosure (%)

      Lower improves ESG score
    • Accounting Flag (%)

      Lower improves ESG score

QQEW Performance

This section shows how this ETF has performed relative to its peer group ETFdb.com Category.

1 Week Return
Rank: 122 of 227
0.72%
Category Low FFTY (-4.91%)
Category High GMAN (3.64%)
4 Week Return
Rank: 64 of 229
4.57%
Category Low FFTY (-4.01%)
Category High GMAN (9.58%)
13 Week Return
Rank: 25 of 224
5.56%
Category Low FFTY (-3.47%)
Category High ESPO (8.78%)
26 Week Return
Rank: 123 of 212
6.78%
Category Low WBIF (-3.43%)
Category High ESPO (14.78%)
Year to Date Return
Rank: 21 of 201
25.08%
Category Low EVSTC (-0.04%)
Category High PRN (31.52%)
1 Year Return
Rank: 20 of 191
8.28%
Category Low FFTY (-14.55%)
Category High USMV (13.59%)
3 Year Return
Rank: 27 of 136
53.58%
Category Low VOX (2.43%)
Category High SPGP (76.09%)
5 Year Return
Rank: 25 of 103
73.56%
Category Low HUSE (9.87%)
Category High FDN (122.60%)

QQEW Fund Flows

This section compares the fund flows of this ETF to peers in the same ETFdb.com Category.

1 Week Fund Flow
Rank: N/A
No Ranking Available
Category Low ACWI (‑$88.4 M)
Category High SPY ($5,949.4 M)
4 Week Fund Flow
Rank: 147 of 158
‑$16.5 M
Category Low SCHB (‑$344.9 M)
Category High SPY ($7,839.8 M)
13 Week Fund Flow
Rank: 196 of 205
‑$84.4 M
Category Low FDN (‑$350.1 M)
Category High VOO ($5,669.2 M)
26 Week Fund Flow
Rank: 201 of 216
‑$81.8 M
Category Low SPY (‑$1,738.6 M)
Category High VOO ($8,316.2 M)
Year to Date Fund Flow
Rank: 52 of 222
$100.1 M
Category High VOO ($13,310.9 M)
1 Year Fund Flow
Rank: 72 of 223
$65.2 M
Category Low IWF (‑$1,613.3 M)
Category High IVV ($16,354.3 M)
3 Year Fund Flow
Rank: 96 of 225
$97.4 M
Category Low IWF (‑$1,965.0 M)
Category High IVV ($65,392.5 M)
5 Year Fund Flow
Rank: 206 of 225
‑$27.8 M
Category Low PKW (‑$1,971.8 M)
Category High IVV ($79,035.9 M)

Brought to You by ETF Flows


Charts

The following charts can be customized to display historical performance in a number of different formats, including line charts, bar charts, and candlesticks. Time periods can be adjusted to increase or decrease the period shown, ranging from five minutes to several months.

The following chart also includes the option to compare the performance of QQEW relative to other ETFs and benchmarks or to include indicators such as Bollinger Bands, relative strength, and moving averages.

QQEW Valuation

This section shows how the P/E multiple of this ETF compares to the peer group ETFdb.com Category.

P/E Ratio
Rank: 155 of 227
22.01
Category Low WBIL (-9899.0)
Category High JHML (71.1)

QQEW Dividend

This section shows how the dividend yield of this ETF compares to the peer group ETFdb.com Category.

Dividend
$0.08
Dividend Date
2019-06-14
Annual Dividend Rate
$0.30
Annual Dividend Yield
Rank: 192 of 210
0.44%
Category Low ESPO (0.03%)
Category High QYLD (10.69%)

QQEW Technicals

Volatility Analysis

This section shows how the volatility of this ETF compares to the peer group ETFdb.com Category.

5 Day Volatility
Rank: 6 of 229
158.74%
Category Low EVSTC (0.40%)
Category High SOCL (221.65%)
20 Day Volatility
Rank: 28 of 227
17.70%
Category Low CCOR (6.73%)
Category High FDNI (32.59%)
50 Day Volatility
Rank: 24 of 226
19.52%
Category Low CCOR (6.73%)
Category High FDNI (31.10%)
200 Day Volatility
Rank: 23 of 215
18.40%
Category Low CCOR (6.07%)
Category High FDNI (27.24%)
Beta
Rank: 16 of 226
1.18
Category Low FDNI (-1.88)
Category High WBIF (28.14)
Standard Deviation
Rank: 54 of 187
4.00%
Category Low FTLB (0.69%)
Category High ONEQ (18.27%)

Technicals

  • 20 Day MA: $66.34
  • 60 Day MA: $66.84
  • MACD 15 Period: 1.68
  • MACD 100 Period: 2.18
  • Williams % Range 10 Day: 17.20
  • Williams % Range 20 Day: 13.43
  • RSI 10 Day: 65
  • RSI 20 Day: 57
  • RSI 30 Day: 55
  • Ultimate Oscillator: 63

Bollinger Brands

  • Lower Bollinger (10 Day): $65.26
  • Upper Bollinger (10 Day): $69.16
  • Lower Bollinger (20 Day): $63.97
  • Upper Bollinger (20 Day): $68.73
  • Lower Bollinger (30 Day): $63.39
  • Upper Bollinger (30 Day): $68.40

Support & Resistance

  • Support Level 1: $68.01
  • Support Level 2: $67.85
  • Resistance Level 1: $68.43
  • Resistance Level 2: $68.69

Stochastic

  • Stochastic Oscillator %D (1 Day): 37.49
  • Stochastic Oscillator %D (5 Day): 76.71
  • Stochastic Oscillator %K (1 Day): 52.05
  • Stochastic Oscillator %K (5 Day): 80.46

Fact Sheet

Fact sheets are issued by the ETF provider and framed by ETFdb.com. Information contained within the fact sheet is not guaranteed to be timely or accurate.

Source: LSEG Information Services (US), Inc. (“LSEG”) © LSEG 2016. All rights in the XTF data, ratings and / or underlying data contained in this communication (“the XTF information”) vest in LSEG and/or its licensors. Neither LSEG nor its licensors accept any liability arising out of the use of, reliance on or any errors or omissions in the XTF information. No further distribution of the XTF information is permitted without LSEG’s express written consent. LSEG does not promote, sponsor or endorse the content of this communication.

Copyright MSCI ESG Research LLC [2018]. All Rights Reserved. MSCI ESG Research LLC’s (“MSCI ESG”) Fund Metrics products (the “Information”) provide environmental, social and governance data with respect to underlying securities within more than 23,000 multi-asset class Mutual Funds and ETFs globally. MSCI ESG is a Registered Investment Adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. MSCI ESG materials have not been submitted, to nor received approval from, the US SEC or any other regulatory body. None of the information constitutes an offer to buy or sell, or a promotion or recommendation of, any security, financial instrument or product or trading strategy, nor should it be taken as an indication or guarantee of any future performance, analysis, forecast or prediction. None of the Information can be used to determine which securities to buy or sell or when to buy or sell them. The Information is provided “as is” and the user of the Information assumes the entire risk of any use it may make or permit to be made of the Information. All Information is provided solely for your internal use, and may not be reproduced or redisseminated in any form without express prior written permission from MSCI. Neither MSCI ESG nor any of its affiliates or any third party involved in or related to creating any Information makes any express or implied warranties, representations or guarantees, and in no event will MSCI ESG or any such affiliate or third party have any liability for any direct, indirect, special, punitive, consequential or any other damages (including lost profits) relating to any Information. More information on MSCI ESG Fund Metrics, provided by MSCI ESG Research LLC, can be found at https://www.msci.com/esg-fund-metrics.
© 2019 Market data provided is at least 15-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions.

Information is provided 'as is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use, please see disclaimer.